Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

if 71 said they are attacking you if you attack 62-67 then its an illegal alliance and they should be blocked

So I told the cop, "No YOU'RE driving under the influence... of being a JERK!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFjjO_lhf9c

177 (edited by EmoHotPocket 30-Jul-2011 00:17:08)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

> Ambrosius wrote:

...

Emo you are the reason people don't continue playing this game along with WS and several others...

...I don't fail at life and resort to a game to stave off my eventual suicide...go YOU! At least you still have IC!








Ambro.... first off. it is my right to verbally abuse anyone who associates with Tobias.
second. do you think I will kill myself if I lose a war in IC? ffs. what kind of drugs are you on? i would like some too. lol


it's just a game, but there are certain protocols in this game that 99% of players abide by. If our fam wanted to do shady crap like that, we could cut ntw and farm tiny fams, it's as equally viable as 66 cancelling on 62. but we try and fight fair so everyone can enjoy their round. with that said, i dont care that 66 is fighting 62. i care about the timing, it seems deliberate and stupid. both sides were looking to a rare good cancellation war. and some idiots (66) decided to mess it all up. and THAT is why the game is dying. lol. can't even get a decent cancellation war anymore without idiots being retarded. lol.


and for the record. I am having fun. just want the war to go on because otherwise i'll be bored out of my mind this round.

EmuHatPacket!
Parrot> he isn't a pickle
Parrot> or in the army
Lexuzis> wtf?
Parrot> fing liar

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Lol well that's what it says in the earlier posts. Since there is no signed NAP, they would not allow us to interfere during their attacks (paraphrasing)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

> Captain Planet wrote:

> if 71 said they are attacking you if you attack 62-67 then its an illegal alliance and they should be blocked



lol, IAs dont work if we're currently raiding one another. read a book fool.

EmuHatPacket!
Parrot> he isn't a pickle
Parrot> or in the army
Lexuzis> wtf?
Parrot> fing liar

180 (edited by Ambrosius 30-Jul-2011 00:38:05)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

@Emo... I have never known Tobias prior to this round so you must have me confused, as I don't "associate" with anyone in this game and have only met him through our alliance. The drug I'm on is called cannibis, and I'm more than willing to share cause you need to chill...and if you read Oxys post, we're looking for probable solutions, not your incessant ramblings.

And no I don't figure you'll actually kill yourself, until IC crashes for good or your computer does. tongue

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

hmmm

1) i smoke weed all the time
2) my retorts are well formed, always correct, and reasonably concise... not "incessant ramblings"
3) i quit IC for like 4 years, didn't miss a step lol
4) you sound like an idiot

EmuHatPacket!
Parrot> he isn't a pickle
Parrot> or in the army
Lexuzis> wtf?
Parrot> fing liar

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

@ emo

> Captain Planet wrote:

> if 71 said they are attacking you if you attack 62-67 then its an illegal alliance and they should be blocked



lol, IAs dont work if we're currently raiding one another. read a book fool.


I will!! I'll read Ms. Bridget Spunkweiser's Imperial Conflict's Pop-up Book of Etiquette

So I told the cop, "No YOU'RE driving under the influence... of being a JERK!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFjjO_lhf9c

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

haha smile

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

184 (edited by Ambrosius 30-Jul-2011 00:47:05)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

@Emo - I even got a point by point...how special you can count too. And you sound like a real piece of work yourself.

1) explains a lot in terms of your functioning brain power
2) your ramblings are incessant as you seem to enjoy personal attacks to actual discussions. If you wish to have a battle of wits I implore you to ingame me, we'll exchange contact info and see how smart you really think you are.
3) its too bad you came back
4) seems those who resort to name calling are indeed the most simple minded (you=case and point)

your personal attacks mean a lot coming from someone whose named themselves after a 2min microwavable pastry and a genre of little boys crying all the time.

185 (edited by Tobes 30-Jul-2011 01:20:20)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Emo your just whining now coz i beat your ass earlier in the round. put your dummy back in your mouth and move on

your still not walking right after our last episode..... lol

let it go.. get over things.. next round when you dont have parrot n torqez n lex to wipe your arse emo lets see how well you do  :)

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

186

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

EM, we both had our last round end in some ridiculous fashion and yet here we are still loitering about haha. We fail big_smile

@ Ambrosius, I am seeing both sides fairly, or trying to at least. You have some awesome players in your fam I've played with. Anyway, an ally should be treated as an extension of one's fam, and it takes some work/communication to cooperate. Koodos to 62/67 for working so well together (it appears so at least) and having such a strong alliance, that's part of their accomplishments. And shame on many of us for having fail alliances whether it be due to bad luck, planning, communication... whatever. Part of an obstacle your fam has to overcome since you have been outplayed in that aspect. And if the fight is a matter of going FTW, it really doesn't make sense for 62/67 to do a 1on1 with your fam. So I really think you should capitalize on this war by getting eco ready, positions set up, your ally ready (and convinced), and cancel when the time's right.

The right time? debatable tongue Who knows, 5080 is still very much a threat and still in it FTW!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

so what the hell is happening in this war?????

wheres this MIGHTY WHITESHADOW?????

did WS just fail? what happened can someone please post action reports???

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

188 (edited by WS IC Legend 30-Jul-2011 02:13:30)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

well WS is doing a JOB on serial killer smile

Got his fleet to nothing and then we all took about 158 so far smile

Plus I killed one of their DS hitting serial with 100 droids smile

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

i dont understand only 1 person seemed to jump and thats parrot.....

the fam that was cancelled on out jumped there aggressor and doubled there fleet jump????

i am confused as to where 65/62s savings are.

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

NAP between 62/67 and 66 reinstated

I'm on fire!

191 (edited by [PW9]~KT~ 30-Jul-2011 02:16:03)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Tobes, they had more than we did. We knew that. When WhiteShadow makes a post in the forum stating he is coming for you, it is a pre-warning they were going to cancel, you better take heed. We saved for a couple days more and canceled at a better time for us than what they would have done. We beat them by 4 hours on the cancel.

It was perfectly logical that that out jumped us. No surprises here.


[02:38] <WhiteShadow> lol smile
[02:38] <WhiteShadow> you beat us by 4hrs anyway

~~Lemming of leather and lollipops~~

Right, so what are we waiting for?  Can we get this going?  Any other feedback?

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

There's out jumping and there's out jumping. 71/80 had more figs from the start, we had more ground. And it stayed like that.



Mean time, we're killing DSs. Count's at 4 killed right now ;p

I'm on fire!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

<Kleptomania> Our relations with 5062 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 40 weeks.
<Kleptomania> it's still canceled so I'm not sure wtf Nukem is talking about?

sorry duke nukem

we will clear u from our cores and let u continue your war

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

hmm it's aparent this is a discussion that has occurred between leaders...

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Talk to Spam

I'm on fire!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Artic is suffering from paranoid delusions again. According to his last post hes gonna break the NAP anyways. What a hypocrite! LOL

[19:48] <Artic> let it be known
[19:48] <Artic> this war between 62 and 80 was no war
[19:48] <Artic> 30 planets? that is no war
[19:49] <AA> 30 planets?
[19:49] <AA> are you in either of these alliances, Artic?
[19:49] <Artic> yea, we wont allow 62 to save for us while they fight a fake war with 80
[19:49] <AA> are you in either of these alliances, Artic?
[19:49] <Artic> that would of been napped within 48 hours anyways
[19:49] <Artic> no im in 66
[19:49] <AA> then stfu


for the record this IS NOT a fake war. Ops are flying, planets are being lost and gained by both sides. If you could see the news for both alliances you would see that this war isnt a fake.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he&#65279; is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

not fake but bullshit indeed

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Bullshit? What planet are you from artic?

I dont know why im arguing with you anyways. Beleive whatever you want. Its not like anyone takes you seriously.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he&#65279; is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

post gains and losses then please. smile

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

200

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

pretty sure firefox has been raided for 100ish planets just a few ticks ago so no idea what the 30 planets came from.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?