Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

lol

Sex without the e is still SX!

127

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Though we would have loved to continue this most interesting scuffle, i fear we will have to move for a postponing of the festivities untill such time we have made at least 6 people in 66 delete. I hope 80 and 71 find it in their hearts to give us the needed reprieve, after which we will gladly rejoin this most enjoyable dance. Your consideration in this less than savory situation is allready much appreciated.

Yes Artic, 6, no less. You just made a little booboo i fear.

When speaking your mind, it is of utmost importance to keep using it !

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

> Duke Nukem wrote:

> Week 40, 15Reply Save
well pretty obvious you have been saving and 65's been opped. i'm all about fair play, although i've been having fun attacking you guys and losing some too, i'll stop if you fighting.
Signed, Mike of Sexsomnia (#5066)




That message is now considered hypocritical. Trust goes a long way they say, until u encounter someone who doesn't give a shit, eh?


Bwahaha this was when you were fighting 65 and we agreed to stop attacks until you were done....and the "nap" was never signed in game

If your gonna show a quoted message, make sure it's relative to the present situation...just like a politician...always trying to misquote people

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

I never intended to misquote something or someone. I put that up as an indication that I thought Spam was a nice guy. Back then u were fine napping us when we were about to hit 65. Now you turn around by canceling as soon as our war starts with 80/71. Two opposites. Goes to show how trustworthy some people in this game are; to do the right thing.



If you find your strategy to be clever and well thought-through, if you believe you'll win the round by playing this way and only caring about wininng... well, you might find yourself heavily mistaken at some point.

I'm on fire!

130 (edited by EmoHotPocket 29-Jul-2011 21:14:33)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

> Ambrosius wrote:

> Cowards? Lol you morons can whine...its called strategy dur...the name of the game, in fact why don't you wonderful mods remove our PNAP with 80/71 and let us declare on you as well! Then we'll truly have an EoR war to end all wars.

Btw we had intended to cancel on 62/67 way before news of war was posted in Uni

Its not advantage we're looking for...we simply understand that to win requires intelligence and strategy, fortunately we have both. GG

------------------------


I accept your offer to war 80/71 alliance.


can we mod cancel the NAP between our alliance and 66/76?   i will now ask our leader to NAP 67/62 because even tho they seemed like they were gonna lose the war, they scored several 100% Nekos. also Ambrosius is clearly bffs with Tobias.  anyone who allies Tobias is probably a loser douche bag and needs a second lesson on why 80/71 is better than they are. just saying...


but either way it's ok. 80 has won round based on skill of fighting, and honor. ur bogus p count wont mean crap 66.  (assuming 62 doesnt rape u guys regardless of this BS)

EmuHatPacket!
Parrot> he isn't a pickle
Parrot> or in the army
Lexuzis> wtf?
Parrot> fing liar

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Iwill gladly show 66/76 why ppl don't fight me when I'm motivated

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

You might have the advantage, but this war was hardly over or won EMO tongue

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

133 (edited by Ambrosius 29-Jul-2011 21:27:36)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

wasn't my idea to cancel...lol...just saying that its within the parameters of the game.

Tho I may be a douche, this is my first actual round in almost 5years...but I'm remembering why I quit. Too much whining...and too many politics.

Talk to Spam, I'm simply stating facts, not instigating a 4v2 against 66/76...

In addition, this is a GAME...as good as you all may be at it, you gain no status in RL, you will never be recognized by your community or gain a better social status for winning, or whining for that matter. If you don't like the parameters of the game then change it.

I have no desire to wrin or lose the wars between 80/71vs 66/76 or 62/67vs66/76, whichever may actually occur, I simply wish to play the game and enjoy...but unfortunately it seems we are ever pressed to insure no one who is decent at this game (and actually brings new people to it) stays, it seems the ever present goal to run people off from it...Emo you are the reason people don't continue playing this game along with WS and several others...

So loser douche bag of IC...i accept this title, at least I don't fail at life and resort to a game to stave off my eventual suicide...go YOU! At least you still have IC!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Lol just a 4v2 against 62/67

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

i dont know whats going on

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

wtf? we have nothing to do with this bullshit.

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

although.. you could put us out of our misery aswell tongue

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

This isnt about winning or planet size Ambrosius. Its about having fun. 66 is depriving us of a fun, fair cancel war. Its total crap. You just want to win no matter how its achieved. Its cheesy and cowardly. There is ABSOLUTELY NO strategy involved here. NONE!

Theres no need to have a MOD cancel the pnap between 80/71 and 66/76. There is nothing in our relations page. Its not official. I warned both leaders of 66/76 that going ahead with this war on 62/67 will result in consequences.

As far as im concerned.....if its not signed in the relations page, it doesnt exist.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

lol guys lets just play and dont worry about the other fams doing w/e

in the end even tho I trash talk for a purpose its still just a game and I will have fun no matter who does what.

Hell, I will be back next round talkign same shit and telling eveyone Im gonna kick their ass tongue

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Im having fun too big_smile

Im gonna have alot more fun if 66 actually goes through with this war. Personally id like to see one big massive war between all 3 alliances to finish the round. Sounds like a blast. Im not gonna sit on my hands and watch 66/76 vulture a cheesy win though.

Its one thing to war 62/67 after our war. Whatever, thats their business. But to interfere with ours? OH HELL NO!! You dont cancel a NAP the same tick a war starts! LOL

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

When is there ever a good time to Cancel on someone AA tell me that?

again...I'm not the one who decided this I'm just in the family involved so by default I suppose I decided this?

WS - I appreciate that, I understand you can talk some mad shizzle, but I feel that's the mentality we should all have in regards to the game!

I'm just here for fun, I'm not sure about integirty/honor/trust/friendships extending beyond this game, because in this game I can be whoever I want...(a meek banker who only helps his family, or a raping pillaging attacker who slaughters at will and has complete disregard for families/alliances/friends) that's the whole fun of the game and you guys are trying to make this game way to serious way to political, who the hell want's to play the same round over, and over, and over, and over...at least you now have something new to complain about...be thankful

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

breaking a nap is not so pretty either though J tongue

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Ambrosius, don't worry mate, I realize this is just a game. We all want to have fun, and you're allowed your point of view on what having fun in this game means. That doesn't take away that this is a low move.

It also doesn't imply that you have to resort to calling people no-lives and saying we all will turn suicidal because our lives are shit and we have to resort to playing an online text-based game. That's a total load of bullshit, and you know it. The only reason I'm here is because I wanted to see how well people still play this game on the one hand, and to play a round with friends I made years ago on the other hand. Fact remains that your strategy is still lame and cowardly, regardless of the outcome.

I'm on fire!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Ambrosius wrote: "When is there ever a good time to Cancel on someone AA tell me that?"

thats a cop out excuse if i ever heard one tongue

Your missing the point here. Reduced to it's basic element: your interfering with our FUN!! This has been a fun war the last 4 ticks. Its not gonna be over in 2 days. Why would you guys interfere in that? We have been planning this for almost 2 weeks now. Then you aholes come along and screw it all up.

I almost wonder if this isnt about planets, but more about getting attention. Like the little kid at someone else's birthday party. Acting out like a spoiled attention starved brat cuz he isnt the center of attention. You guys can spin it and sugarcoat it all ya want. We all know whats going on here.

Anyways.....i hope 66 goes along with it now. I can care less if i get rogued, im gonna do something about it.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

LOL Elrohir! What NAP? I dont see anything in the relations page wink

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

146 (edited by Ambrosius 29-Jul-2011 22:11:31)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

@Duke you're making it too personal my friend, I'm talking about the people who are going overboard with the notions of what is happening, I'm not saying it's not a low move, but again wasn't decided by me now was it? I'm simply saying that the people who are harrassing spam ingame and then proceeding to call me a "loser douche bag" and also knock other people on a consistent basis are the ones who use IC as crutch for life...for that I give no apologies...

and my point is cemented by AA's comment as well! please send me personal attacks, I hope they make me cry in self pity later

No, I did not have my own birthday party, and wish to take over yours. YES, I want to be the center of attention, as you can well tell as this is my first time to actually post in forums more than 1-2 words.

AA - Yes it is a cop out 100% but in retrospect if we cancel a 48hr NAP and war ends doesn't end in 2 days (a.k.a. 48hrs) and no attacks were made until war between fams was finished, isn't that simply considered a back to back war?

ALSO our allies have never canceled on 62/67 so once the attacks can begin it's a 2v1, again where is all of this "low tactis" bull shit coming into play exactly? I'm still not sure what all the uproar is about, but whatever, plans proceed forward I suppose, I'm not leader, I'm merely a player looking to get back into the game. How lame this has been...

147 (edited by AdriusAvangion 29-Jul-2011 22:11:36)

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

i never called anyone a loser douchebag, nor am i taking this personally. Im just playing the game. All im saying is: if this is how yall wanna play, then fine. Lets see what happens. Im playing too big_smile

and ambrosius....this isnt exactly directed at just you. Im addressing your entire alliance with my comments.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Wait hold on - I was teaching at a camp all week and just saw the reaction to the cancellation.

What's the issue with a 2v2v1?  76 has no involvement and we want to have some fun with 62/67 as well.  62/67 has a perceived advantage at the start based on how people in this thread were acting, so maybe morale issues balance things out for all families.  I think this is a great way to figure out who should be king of the round...what is the issue?  It was obv after our skirmishes with 60/61, 58/79, etc that we would be out of targets and it was just a matter of who canceled first.  This buildup has been happening for a week and no one realized it?  Is everyone really that dense?  Oi


Look, if the alliances involved and THAT put out by this matter of ONE FAM canceling TWO days after your war has started, then let's do this.  71 signs their AGREED pnap ingame to solidify the pnap (it's been signed in msgs but I guess we forgot to sign it) and we will ask a mod to reinstate our NAPs with 62 and 67.  But since 62/67 is a bigger alliance than 66/76, we are going to want to fight a fam 1v1.  We would prefer to fight 62 I think - no market aid or anything from allies - since we have more shares with that fam.  I'm pretty sure Spam is okay with this and so if 62/67 leaders agree, we can fix this today ya bunch of women X(

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

Boom!

Re: ~MW WAR 80/71 vs 62/67~

I'm 100 percent behind AA. Talic and Impire have been too good to the game and community for this kind of bs.

Sex without the e is still SX!