Topic: Nap signature

Nap signature


I think a leader signature is no longer enough, as there are to many leaders signing naps as the see fit with out consulting the family..... which runes a lot of rounds... has happened 3 rounds in a row for me and have also herd other people complain too.


I think it would be good to get at least 1 VL to co-sign it, for it to be official. if they could implement it some how in the relations page some how would be great, (like the leader can post it in relations, but wont be official till a VL accepts it.... would stop all these useless naps.....


and people can get back to playing the game how it was meant to be.....

.>   )\;`a__
(  _ _)/ /-." /~~ 
(rawr)
`( )_ )/
  <_  <_

Re: Nap signature

like*

sup bitches

3

Re: Nap signature

dont like*

you dont need signatures in nap, you only need it signed at relations and you need the rogue tag to be used as it should to avoid nap violations.  And this is the 100th time I mention it X( tho mods dont care a shit about my great idea.

Re: Nap signature

yes i know it needs to be signed in relations, but im saying for it to be accepted in relations, a VL needs to sign off on it, so that way the leader cant make stupid naps with out the family knowing.

.>   )\;`a__
(  _ _)/ /-." /~~ 
(rawr)
`( )_ )/
  <_  <_

Re: Nap signature

Shouldn't follow a leader if you don't trust the naps he'll make for you.

Re: Nap signature

Well even a good leader can make a bad call......

.>   )\;`a__
(  _ _)/ /-." /~~ 
(rawr)
`( )_ )/
  <_  <_

Re: Nap signature

Well even a good mod can make a bad call......

snapity snap snap

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: Nap signature

Die.