This might be more persuading if you were to provide more explanation/examples regarding the one argument meant to prove your thesis, i.e. Godel's incompleteness theorem.

I'm going to be very blunt:

You posted a thread with a conclusion, yet without substantiation within this thread (which we can find ourselves).

What kind of discussion did you think would happen here?

Eh... fair enough, I guess...

*sits on the sidelines to watch*

EDIT: Actually, though, this sort of thread may set up a bad precedent for threads.

Picture, if you will, me doing the exact same thing in another thread:

Title: Global warming will kill us all.

Post:
[Me explaining that there's a theory that CO2 is causing global warming, and stating its implications.]

Response:
Proof?

My reply:
You can find the proof yourself.

Note the problem?  Though I'll admit, by citing the theorem itself (albeit without a link or anything), it may be less problematic.  Just highlighting the issue.

I resent any "science" which tells me I can't have my cake and eat it. X( I am however a very big fan of quantum physics.

   You know, even I watched that particular episode of Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman.

Ok, here's an example for you brainiac, which is my own theorom, positively to rock your world view.

Came up with the idea that humanity will never understand the multiverse.  Not just the universe mind you, but the multiverse.  Why is that?  Because there are answers to every single question, unfortunately the answers as we know it are constantly changing, because the relationship of the question continuously changes as well.  How theory's are proven to be fact, and then those facts change when a better theory comes along.  Take a Triangle.  That Triangle = Q.  Now place another triangle inside that Triangle.  That triangle is an answer, but oddly enough, that triangle is surrounded by three other triangles.  The answer has given us more questions to answer, because inside the First Triangle is four triangles.  Now you perceive 4 triangles inside a larger triangle.  Now you have to ansswer the other questions, by placing an answer inside each by placeing another triangle...which creates another set of 3 questions surrounding the answer.

Add infinitum...you will always have more questions, than answers.  Therefor, the multiverse can never be fully explained.  It would be an infinite number of questions surrounding an infinite amount of answers.  So in the end we will never know, or answer all of the universal questions.

So my answer to you is, "What, me worry?"

So know your asking, what does this have to do with incompleteness theorem....well if you look at it really closely it doesn't really answer everything, thefor it's a perfect analogy for incompleteness.  Because you will never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever...get the WHOLE answer to life, and the meaning of the universe.

Sucks to be you don't it?

I call this Key's Theory to Infinite Harmonic Question Regression.  And YES, it is my personal theory on how I perceive the multiverse.

Funny, I thought that was what politicians, board of directors corporate america, and my boss was doing right now.