> KickAssDuke-DoD wrote:
> This is sick.
You people don't even pay attention to what's said.
Yes they were active and and helped the family and allies. The problem was that our family had some SS and new players, and our allies couldn't even handle a family half their size. So they got it in their head to absorb family members and to take over a large amount of planets from them - feeling they were being wasted with their current owners.
This is so bogus. Is it really so easy to get away with this stuff?
"feeling they were being wasted with their current owners", thats the key, you are acusing them of taking planets off inactive players in the fam, that's perfect, you can keep not very active players in a fam making sure they build 6 explos a day, so they are cheap explos for the fam, this ways the inactives can still help the fam that way, its all a matter of talking about it and realise, when a player cannot be very active still he can help the fam instead of killing him.
We had 1 inactive playing that way in the last Koth round, he was coming sometimes to chat and spend some time there with us and agreed he'd try to do cheap explos for the fam, as he had no real time to play the round following the fam pace.
Taking planets from other players in the fam is not a bad thing when you are more active and can use those planets better, in benefit of the whole fam. This is not a reason to fire active people, its crazy, you had probably personal reasons to do it.