Re: 4751/4743 VS 4746/4752 WARRRR!!!!!
I call it a 3v1 since arby has such a Fathead ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 4751/4743 VS 4746/4752 WARRRR!!!!!
I call it a 3v1 since arby has such a Fathead ![]()
Im not that big! EarthMover is fatteh! Im just 2nd fatteh! ![]()
> Aleph wrote:
(...)
Week 40, 14Reply Save
I wanted to try to agree to peace right now because I don't like farming a fam more than like 10-15% of their planets. But Artic just came in my chat showing us messages from 62 asking for shares which is an Illegal Alliance and threatening us with it....That really annoys me =p
Signed, Arby3p0 of Lil Fudgeh (#4751)
hardcore4eva The Rock suggests you stop making shit up before The Rock is forced to take his hand and slap that taste out of your mouth
If you smell what The Rock is cooking
couldnt say it better my self the rock
52/43 have no (not much) shares, the ones who do are not porrtalled or out of range (size and travel time)
so atm it's 51/43 vs 46 till we can join in against 51
can i vulture?
Depends on which fam you want to vulture! ![]()
> Killas wrote:
> can i vulture?
No, please ![]()
like i said killas, 51 and 43 are open targets for chosing a loopsided 2v1 war
so yes u can vulture them
na killas don't vulture or i won't spam the pinwheel uni thread with you again >:(
250 planet(s) missing in action
this is 2v1 battle
lot of honor, hoecakes
> Artic wrote:
> like i said killas, 51 and 43 are open targets for chosing a loopsided 2v1 war
so yes u can vulture them
You're one to talk about honor Artic considering you are telling people to vulture... not much honor in that statement. Stand up and fight like a man. Heaven forbid you fight a 2v1 in an online war game.
After getting 2vs1 before this round and again now..
With other words.......Artic is just stating he wouldn't mind dishonorable things to happen too fams/players without honor.
and some people wonder why IC is slowly dieing....
of those 250 planets lost....43 took like 15 of them. So 2v1? Only their pax was efficient.
As for IC dying...that's a myriad of reasons. Bad play has always been part of the game, and is punished in the same way every round. This war would have ended yesterday...but nap terms weren't acceptable to some.
to be fair though, that's what makes alliances and diplomacy so important in this game. i don't know the details of how this 2v1 came about but if there was no foul play involved, i don't disapprove of what 43/51 are doing. it's strategically sound and not really dishonorable.
theoretically, if 47/56 had killed 65 earlier in the round and managed to get a 2v1 against 50, that's just playing smart.
It wasn't about NAP terms Arby, if you'd given all planets back with infra and compensation planets 46 still wouldn't have NAPped, you know that it about loyalty and trust.
Important thing is with alliance is loyalty, alliance is like marriage.. for better and worse....
We will have to see which it will be ![]()
> Sol Invictus wrote:
> It wasn't about NAP terms Arby, if you'd given all planets back with infra and compensation planets 46 still wouldn't have NAPped, you know that it about loyalty and trust.
So that's why Artic was asking for a nap like what, 10 ticks into war?
/Me is confused...
I could post the convo in here, it's all logged. And funny that you mention handing back all planets with infra
Although i don't know if i'm supposed to show everyone that convo, might be a bit too revealing...
plus i don't understand the complains about this going on... surely we had almost reached a nap agreement till artic decided to show some msg that made h4e a bit angry, not to mention Aleph wanting to have some fun as well.
Too bad i'm not playing with Aleph this round, always fun to see him attack with almost nothing... but we'll just have to continue till he has nothing left to attack with. I am surprised they are able to keep his fleet running with what income they're supposed to have after the work Wendy and I did ![]()
> Nox wrote:
> to be fair though, that's what makes alliances and diplomacy so important in this game. i don't know the details of how this 2v1 came about but if there was no foul play involved, i don't disapprove of what 43/51 are doing. it's strategically sound and not really dishonorable.
thank you, finally someone who acknowledges the strategic advantage this 2vs1 surprise attack gives you and how it isn't dishonorable.... you have perm allies, why not use them, right?
Loyalty and trust? The way I understood it, everybody was agreed to a nap between all 4 families except for 1 player in 4746. That threw everything out the window.
I gave Fygaro a nap before the SOR. Just the same as he did for me last round. You're new leader of his family, or have been, I'm not sure, didn't pay attention. You had nap. We wanted to war your ally. Suprise is key in good wars. Why would we even fight, if we were to give you 2 days to prepare? This isn't a #1 vs #2 battle...it's lower ranking fams and we are all trying to climb the ladder. We want best possible chance at winning. We only dropped the 48hr nap with 4752 so it wouldn't be a pure 2v1.
This isn't a #1 vs #2 battle...it's lower ranking fams and we are all trying to climb the ladder. We want best possible chance at winning. We only dropped the 48hr nap with 4752 so it wouldn't be a pure 2v1
your so full of shit
your fam and your allies have been 2v1ing us for more than 48 hours, our allies still arent involved dont be an idiot, doushbage
not more than 48 hours dude, 48 hours haven't passed yet otherwise that nap would've expired by now ![]()
Exactly! I canceled nap and declared at same tick. I think I would remember the time frame. Duh. Just because we were kids when we learned how to play this game...doesnt me we stopped growing up over the past years. Maybe you should try that. ![]()
feels like the partaxies reigning supreme this round
Arby, you're still a kid >:(
I may be a fathead...but im not a kid! X(
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 4751/4743 VS 4746/4752 WARRRR!!!!!
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.