151

Re: 4700 vs 4690

lol srsly there is no illegal warblocks now days, more to do with fams too lazy to take war off.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 4700 vs 4690

> Ocho wrote:

> > SGTSmoker wrote:

> > Joor wrote:

> 4690 was always bigger in NW.


lol and you were 100+ planets bigger... You wonder why you guys became a target when you couldn't capitalize on the farming you guys were doing...


How do you figure we farmed anyone?

We never farmed 1 family ask anyone, if you took a look at our position relative to other families, we grew so large because we had so much room to expand with out much conflict. Clearly you are a noob and do not know what you are talking about, good job buddy! tongue


Then why are we fighting, if not over space to expand?

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

153

Re: 4700 vs 4690

We were not "farming" anyone. That's the key word there bullet tongue. We were just merely ping ponging planets back and forth lol

Re: 4700 vs 4690

Nah, 03 made a lot of profit, 90 did preparations, nailed their pop banker, well, put them checkmate and now 90 wants some profit i guess.

155

Re: 4700 vs 4690

You must admit its a very low move, and when another alliance attacks just your family, you would whine as well.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

i do agree taking more then 20-25% of a fams planets (inc nap payments) is harsh

A man is but the product of his thoughts what he thinks, he becomes.

Weedkillers

Re: 4700 vs 4690

finally its 1v1 again,

03 offered pnap after taking 200-300 planets

Re: 4700 vs 4690

There have been negotiations since tick 1 of the war. Unfortunately Artic decided he would rather join our fam chat to abuse us instead of listening on what we had planned for a NAP deal wink

His loss i guess in the end tongue

"I lie down next to an angel, fall asleep and fly with the demons"
I once prayed to god for some planets, but quickly found out he didnt work that way

159 (edited by Artic 12-Mar-2011 23:33:05)

Re: 4700 vs 4690

lol if thats what u want to say, demanding 100 + planets for a nap

160

Re: 4700 vs 4690

well we are down 500 planets total since this conflict started

Prior to war we were about 1525 planets,
now we are at just above 1k

nothing like a 33% planet loss in a matter of a week by the hands of two fams tongue

All BS aside, good luck to both 03/90, they caught us with our pants down, so to say and profited nicely from it.

161

Re: 4700 vs 4690

The deal worked out before all this started was 70 planets and a morale - shame you were too stubborn to take it Artic ... oh well ... to each his own!

162

Re: 4700 vs 4690

well sucks now bc 89 canceled nap a couple days ago, and is now demanding 50 planets and 2 morales or they will rape us.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

89 is soo unhonourable

164

Re: 4700 vs 4690

They're just moving in when it is most beneficial to their family. Just sucks because of the war with 03/90 and now 89 wants some when the war with 90 is not quite done.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

war isn't over, that's just vulturing.

166

Re: 4700 vs 4690

Oh I know its not over, but talks are being made, or will be in a few ticks I am told.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

well there feeding of us and 06  and your prime target now makes sence

A man is but the product of his thoughts what he thinks, he becomes.

Weedkillers

Re: 4700 vs 4690

planets shouldn't be asked for in nap negotiations, the whole point of war is to take planets, so the amount you take should be enough... demanding FREE planets is just wimpy and poor. a stupid excuse to take more than you are worthy of taking.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

not if you can take a lot more planets and then say: just give us that amount and you can grow again. It just delays growth of both fams smile

Re: 4700 vs 4690

but if you can't actually take them, your don't deserve them. paying compensation to a family who have already destroyed a certain % of your stuff is ridiculous. take a certain amount, nap them and leave them be.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

If you nap for planets, make it a very reasonable amount. If a fam has 1200 pcount before war, you take 300...dont ask for another 100 in a nap. That's just crazy. If you do that, might as well just rape them down to 50% of their original count!

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

172

Re: 4700 vs 4690

I'm told if we pay 50 planets to 90, the war will be over. What do you all think? 33% of planets taken this war (500 planets), so whats another 50 planets?

Re: 4700 vs 4690

No man, you don't get it. It are systems yet to be cleared, and you'll lose infra and fleet on it. And if they have to be taken, you still lose stuff and lose time to rebuild.

While if you give planets, you can even chose which ones, less obed or even non obed, you don't lose stuff, and you don't lose time. Pure psychological.