Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 4691 Declared War against 4701
GONNA SPANK U HOMES (4691) [48,7] 1405 14811735 82405
VS
Street Dancers dancing TIeSTO (4701) [76,36] 1437 11633939 78783
They started attack this tic... hahahaha 
Good Luck both families!
Aleph
I knew this on was coming good luck fams.
haha lol this is crazy lol
and 72 hours cancelation, where did that go?
weeeee nap break
nap was void well over a week ago when 89 started fighting both us and 04, we knew 89 had asked you guys to drop the nap and we were just trying to anticipate when you were going to hit
weee poorly written void clause then? 
Hahaha possibly poor clauses, so funny round.
Uhmmm but possibly very interesting..... Ya first I need to win in PW... so later I will go back and to be as going MW.
Oh! and gays 90 attacking also us... wow
My God! one MODERATOR IC say it.... What funny... now They read forum of families.... 
.... please WC send me one copy where I say: "Ya I Aleph I am going raid against 4691"... please you send me one example.
My family innocent accepted game of our allies.
My friend you failed... you think what I Aleph will accept one stupid war of raids for to win one round?... What fun is it? it is nothing for me.
Walking Corpse
Moderator
Re: 4691 Declared War against 4701
nap was void well over a week ago when 89 started fighting both us and 04, we knew 89 had asked you guys to drop the nap and we were just trying to anticipate when you were going to hit
LOL Aleph
we assumed u would attack, and u had every right to with a voided nap u just didnt and we drew 1st blood
i was surprised u guys didnt start attacks on us days ago since nap was void too bad for u guys
are you guys kidding? trying to justify napbreak by saying it was legal for us to void it so therefor its ok that you brake the nap?
wasnt your fam involved when the terms where made?
We wasnt prepaird for war since we just came out of on war and then you guys brake nap just in case. Stop this silly explanation and just admit you broke the nap and nothing else. it has never been a more clear napbreak than this, period.
wtf Walking_Corpse justifying a blatant nap break? lol!
HAHA i cant believe u had the balls to say that WC lol.... saying it was legal for us to void it so therefore its ok that you brake the nap, It was our decision to weather we void the nap or not..... Not for you guys to decide..... you should have know better..... covering ur asses with attacking prematurely WC you have no honour in the game any more... you an your fam..... scared of the consistencies of the 2v1 with our allies... so take us out of the equation you hit us while our allies are busy with ur allies....
A very low blow.....this is a blatant nap break..... no other way to look at it..... and Tensai.... who are you tryin to convince that his nap break was Justified, cuz u not fooling anyone...
i would tend to disagree ... nap stated that, in case of 2vs1 with your allies, nap would be voided. It did not state that it then gave you the !option! to void it, nor that you could cancel in a lower timeframe, just that it would be void. According to the other thread (91 vs 89) your allies confirmed a 2vs1. Thus, the nap is void. A voided nap does not exist anymore. How can you break a nap that doesnt exist? Insofar the legal mumbojumbo.
I wont say it was a nice thing to do, but it WAS, according to nap conditions, correct. We have been expecting you guys to hit us with all you have for days now, and wouldnt have complained if you did. Ah well, no matter the circumstances ... have a good one.
say what you guys want about our attacks on 01. Our nap was void days ago and no longer existed as TCO has stated.
for the record, 01 came up with that clause in our nap and as 91 and 04 both attacked 89 the nap was void.
Yes it wasn't a nice way to wage war but really is there a nice way? Somebody is eventually going to complain about something.
Nandro, you should go and find out who came up with that nap clause and bitch them out for their stupidity. I've already called WC an old fart for his attempts at making some other clauses. Just ask TCO its funny watching old men work
Poor guy. He think what is funny to do these actions.
and more still they napped 89. Who was motive of this "false war".
They know what Tobias, Colorado, Banzai, Lazynees and Bista of 4704 NEVER attack me by treason.
In resumen: Okis you have fun.... Ya! round very funny!
Good Luck!
Aleph the Eternity - AtE
> Walking Corpse wrote:
> nap was void well over a week ago when 89 started fighting both us and 04, we knew 89 had asked you guys to drop the nap and we were just trying to anticipate when you were going to hit
we actually in all honesty, didnt expect them to help at all, we were gonna do 2v1... if they were gonna help then they shoulda canceled on you guys... but still doesnt make it "void" if you made the first move... if they woulda made the first move and attacked without cancelation and calling it "voiding the nap" then its a diff story
no idea what ur sayin aleph but u can take it and shove it up ur donkey
whats the poor donkey ever done to you eh?
LOL Britlock u silly guy. How can it be a different story. We had the same nap, signed and agreed upon. If you still think we're breaking the nap then ur just being dillusional. If you dont have void clauses in ur naps and u wont see it being void.
we both attacked u, nap became void
You don't bring a void check into the bank and ask if u can still use it. You just know it's no longer useable.
with the new in game nap systems by not signing it you are risking nap break such as this one unfortunately.
and i quote from the nap that was sent
"
in 2vs1 situation or Xvs1 situation, where X is greater than 2, nap can be voided under the following conditions:
Meaning of Attack in the following 2vs1 CLAUSE: fig runs, ground run, taking more than 2% of the planets of the attacked family within 40 ticks.
START OF 2vs1 CLAUSE
when family 4701 is attacked by one or more families and the ally of 4704 already attacks or starts to attack 4701 the nap can be voided immediately.
when family 4704 is attacked by one or more families and the ally of 4701 already attacks or starts to attack 4704 the nap can be voided immediately.
END OF 2vs1 CLAUSE"
key word is "CAN"... it doesnt say... "the nap IS voided immediately".. by putting the word "CAN" still gives the option to the other fam wishing to join the attacks...
in this case, my fam ( 89 ) is in a 2 v 1 situation with 04 and 91... so 01 CAN void the nap against both fams... it doesnt mean that its automatically voided... it simply means 01 HAD THE OPTION to void the nap or keep the nap depending if they want or can help allies or not ...
If it means "nap is voided immediately" then why have a nap in the first place? knowin that you are just purposely just gonna break it anyway??.. im just sayin
im simply stating the facts of what your alliance wrote to our allies... if you have good comprehension of the english language, then you would understand what you actually wrote... if your purpose was to really sneak in that so called "ally clause" then I suggest you need to re-word your nap conditions... all this sneaky clauses dont really work for me... im an old school IC player, thats why when i do naps i just do the standard TNT nap, plain and simple... but i see your intentions as well when you send these said naps...
thats it
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 4691 Declared War against 4701
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.