Well its true, noone sensible uses Vac mode for anything else than abuise really Except for pure attackers maybe, staying without income for a week or two simply costs too much

TCO - Like AA said, contact a mod if you're going away for a few days - this way you can tell from which days you are not able to login, instead of the preset 3 to 7 days.

AA Will you have to show a copy of fly ticket or hotel bill that your VMode is validated by a mod?
And for ppl deleting each 3 weeks what will they have to show to be allowed to join a new fam again?

still 3-4 fams in for the race to #1 now i dont know whos allied to who, but lets see some good wars!

Kollup wrote>
"AA Will you have to show a copy of fly ticket or hotel bill that your VMode is validated by a mod?
And for ppl deleting each 3 weeks what will they have to show to be allowed to join a new fam again?"

There is what, a few hundred of us and we are all pretty tight. For the most part we all know each other and the mods know alot of people as well. Are you seriously gonna bring that nonsense to this arguement kollup? If you cant see that vmode is being abused 99% of the time your an idiot. NOBODY uses vmode for what its intended for. It needs to be changed or modified somehow.

You can keep throwing retarded arguements at me, but the truth remains. Its being abused. You can sit there with your head in the sand or you can face reality.

DDK was making like 70% of 92 cash, having him in Vmode during 7 days should have been an advantage for 90 since 92 couldnt pay upkeeps without him. Before the war 92 was ranked 1 and now is 6th in nw and 10th in size I dont see where 92 took any advantage...So i don't see why there should be any change in rules.
I dont remember having fought any fam using this tactic and if that happened i probably managed to rape the other members that's why i dont remember.
But i remember tons of rounds where deleters like you changed the round for plenty of players, so if there was a rule to change i would vote for one about deleting...

isnt marking an active attacker inactive to pass planets abusing the system too? was it meant for passing planets or was it meant to save morale while you kill an "inactive" off.... lol

i can confirm that, we did some tests years ago with peeps with exactly same number of planets, and took their planets with guys with exactly same number of planets, one was marked inactive, other wasnt ... result was exactly the same.

> AdriusAvangion wrote:

> 4702 isnt at war with anyone. If they are i hope they have a good explanation as to why they are attacking my resourcer.

Im thinking 02 has a war block going on for them. Just my opinion.

Why do  we need to explain why were attacking but i will give you a very short answer Xocotl attacked me a few days ago so i figured he wanted some action is that good enough.

Xochimilco wanted to know if my mom was dead. No room for such question about my mom because she is dead so he will be my personal target for the rest of the round gonna teach him a lesson about running his fuc**g mouth about things he knows nothing about.

@Metrex i dont give a damn how silly it looks to you or anyone else. Somethingsdont need to be said when were playing a game. If he don't like me attacking then he needs to play another game. [HAH! I DIDN'T THINK UNDEATH PAID ATTENTION AND NOW MY POST IS RIDICULOUSLY LONG BECAUSE I'M A FOOL THAT THINKS PLACING AN * IN A WORD MAKES IT OK. and now, some of the works of the great J. R. R. Tolkien.

"When Mr. Bilbo Baggins of Bag End announced that he would shortly be celebrating his eleventy-first birthday with a party of special magnificence, there was much talk and excitement in Hobbiton.

Bilbo was very rich and very peculiar, and had been the wonder of the Shire for sixty years, ever since his remarkable disappearance and unexpected return. The riches he had brought back from his travels had now become a local legend, and it was popularly believed, whatever the old folk might say, that the Hill at Bag End was full of tunnels stuffed with treasure. And if that was not enough for fame, there was also his prolonged vigour to marvel at. Time wore on, but it seemed to have little effect on Mr. Baggins. At ninety he was much the same as at fifty. At ninety-nine they began to call him well-preserved; but unchanged would have been nearer the mark. There were some that shook their heads and thought this was too much of a good thing; it seemed unfair that anyone should possess (apparently) perpetual youth as well as (reputedly) inexhaustible wealth.

On another note, if you kill him then what? will you feel more of a man? lol

just saying its all a bit weird how serious you taking this.

in no way do i mean offense