101 (edited by Flash[light]ning 14-Oct-2010 08:10:26)

Re: 4182 vs 4180

render does it look like i have that opp? guess again tongue

edit: infact, go check, no one in my fam has that opp smile

Re: 4182 vs 4180

Flashy, assuming it's a plant/generate false info op that you're talking about, go check Squeaky's op list tongue

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

Re: 4182 vs 4180

could have should have whatever!

we could have went to war with 75 and owned the crap out of them:D

Re: 4182 vs 4180

no you couldnt of.... and render reason you end up top 5 all the time is cause you farm.

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: 4182 vs 4180

that's rubbish and you know it, render uses excellent diplo and picks fights he knows he can win... had we been farming we would have went for fams much lower than we did... we attacked the fams that were ranked highest and we didn't have any relations with... if that is farming nowadays, i guess everybody has been farming except bottom 5..

Re: 4182 vs 4180

> Render wrote:

> lol crazyone you understood wrong, I aint deleting, I said we ALL of us "should" have deleted when the top4 fams napped at midround to war at eor, that's what i said. I mean a round is wasted when you aren't allowed to win, no matter waht you try

and yes I could destroy my fleet and rape you, but there's no point in losing NW and gain planets when you aint fighting to win size anymore, cause its ALL SETTLED


No render round was over when you agree'd to NAP us and let us war... by doing that you basically conceded you couldn't beat either of our alliances and would allow us to fight FTW.  Do you not understand IC at all?

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: 4182 vs 4180

> Tryme wrote:

> WS we were gonna fight you in a cancellation war but i guess YOU wimped out, rather than us.. wasn't it you that demanded a pnap? rather than going for the 48hr nap we offered?

Just check the ranks we owned you!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


It's so easy to talk shit when you're PNAP'd to both of our alliances and say you are top shit and weren't beaten but the only reason you're talking is because you have that PNAP to save you.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: 4182 vs 4180

> General Mizzle wrote:

> Just for the record we could have ended up in war with render and we could have owned them but it was just before war with ws so would be dumb to spend savings



This is the true reason you aren't dead from both sides.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: 4182 vs 4180

I really wish we'd decided that killing render > EoR war... what were we thinking?

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

110

Re: 4182 vs 4180

lol silv i d so pwn u

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 4182 vs 4180

no uh cus i'd pwn u first n00b

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: 4182 vs 4180

we didn't want pnaps with the top fams, they insisted on having those with us because they wanted to have their gay 12 ticks of eor 'fun' .... what an epic war it was!

Re: 4182 vs 4180

13*

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: 4182 vs 4180

Rin ur so pwned n00b refer to sig ez pz son.

"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"

<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock

Re: 4182 vs 4180

loooool

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

116 (edited by HoaD 14-Oct-2010 14:35:44)

Re: 4182 vs 4180

We are still 7th in size!!

PWNZOR!


And even now its a CF banker VS #80 tongue

[HoaD][Toadies] luv zeh mushr|o_0|ms! big_smile
Statistics/IC Monitor: IC Monitor By HoaD/Toadies
Tools: Toadies Tools
IC-wiki: Toadies IC-wiki

117

Re: 4182 vs 4180

> General Mizzle wrote:

> Just for the record we could have ended up in war with render and we could have owned them but it was just before war with ws so would be dumb to spend savings

You will never know, yes you COULD but you will never know, you just chose to save for your gay war that lasted 6 tics

118

Re: 4182 vs 4180

come on, just to clarify things

1. We started attacking 72 and cleared Lohan spots near our core and even further, it was when I started to clear Mizzle when they came asking for nap and acepted to surrender 4 planets in the surrounds, for the sake of gay eor wars WE LET YOU BE, now you say you could have spent your saves and rape us, MAYBE you COULD, but the real fact is your spots to attack us in core systems where all CLEARED.  The most probable is that in a war 75/72 vs 73/80 by that time you should beat us in the end (considering 75 did nothing during all the round but infrawhore and save, and maybe farm some noobish fam out there). But a war 72 vs 80 your chances were really poor.

2. More or less happened the same with 74/66, the difference is 74 came here whining when they noticed we were clearing there from our land. I went to negotiate with WS directly because the guys in 74 were acting like morons sending blackmail and threatening my ally and stuff like that. I proposed WS a 48h nap so we could fight before eor, always considering his alliance were the winners of the stargays, but yeah he was not so confident of that victory and changed to pNAP.

That's the story, now you can say what you want but it wont change my mind I feel the same about you, now you can tell me your reasons but it wont change my .....oh shit yikes this is a gay song!

119

Re: 4182 vs 4180

And gay is all this topis is about.

[HoaD][Toadies] luv zeh mushr|o_0|ms! big_smile
Statistics/IC Monitor: IC Monitor By HoaD/Toadies
Tools: Toadies Tools
IC-wiki: Toadies IC-wiki

Re: 4182 vs 4180

yay big_smile

I survived the Test? of 12-4-03, anyone remember that?

121

Re: 4182 vs 4180

> HoaD wrote:

> And gay is all this topis is about.


yes the 'topis' is so gay, so is your avatar tho tongue

Re: 4182 vs 4180

if we can continue posting like this, we will surpass the war thread of 75/72 vs 66/74 smile

I survived the Test? of 12-4-03, anyone remember that?

123

Re: 4182 vs 4180

> CrazyOne wrote:

> if we can continue posting like this, we will surpass the war thread of 75/72 vs 66/74 smile

because this war is way more interesting wink

124

Re: 4182 vs 4180

templare -> "we had the balls to fight the top alliance even when odds are stacked against us. not to mention 75 had to recover from a BoR war with them. Also Lohan + Mizzle > Tryme and Render icon39

also allow me to reiterate that this is the first time in 4 rounds I didn't get to kill your fam Render big_smile"


I have to repeat Lohan and Mizzle lost their spots to fight my fam, their chances alone were just jump high and send ranged fleets (to our DSs).

75 had to recover from a bor what?? guys you fled like rats when WS raped your ally, and same did 72 with their ally 77, runaway from trouble when you see your allies fall wink cheers coward

also alow me to reiterate I never play 2 consecutive rounds, so you're talking about waht, 6 rounds ago??? not to mention the low moves you used to "win" those war to my fam, it'd take some pages to re-write all what happened on those days, plus your glory means only dishonour to me. I keep myself and the fams I lead out of the trash you bring to this game wink