• Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol
is rickybobby hardcore4eva?

names hardcore has used to confuse me

1) hardcore4eva
2) H
3) rickybobby
4) alien
5) jormunga
6) IamSS

... there was a 7th but by this point my head is too blagged to keep up tongue

well i cant see why 90 chose to cancel NAP when they were "short on iron" and only had 1 active attacker (arctic) to jump?

its like why set yourself up for fail? you could have waited a few more days and saved

meh

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

202 Reply by Kai

  • Kai
  • Kai
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 782

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

We aint dead yet wink

But we cant do much more then just retakes I guess.
And indeed a little respect for Artic would be nice. He stood up and did his best. Couldnt ask for more.

''Everything is easy, Unless you make it difficult''
The Legend always returns

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,827
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Sneaking Luster into our core is a legit move. We have all seen it numerous times and there is nothing illegal or cheap about it...however.... its done way too often. Its like the only trick Lee and Luster seem to know anymore these days. The strategy itself isnt pathetic. Lee and Luster are pathetic for being 'one trick ponys' all the time.

I will say this: at least 90/91 tried to do something proactively. They didnt wait around for us to cancel. I have to give them credit for having the guts to do what they did. I thought the market aid thing yall did was smart, not cheap. Thats what alliances are for.

Overall the 99/97 alliance is more active, organized and cooperative than the 90/91 alliance. In my opinion that was the difference maker. Our alliance also has 2 very active Partaxians both of which have had an impact on the war. Just goes to show that every family needs an active Partaxian. CPFF is a great tactical spell that is not utilized often enough.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,512

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Both 91 and 99 did mistakes.

91 jumped ONE guy to 15mill nw.
That stuff could have been inuf to get 1 guy to 6mill one to 4 one to 2 and cover most of our members allowing a attack all over the board against our members.
Thus putting a hard pressuve on us allowing you a victory.

We jumped h4e to 11mill wich also was a mistake.
We should have gotten him to 6mill me to 4 next to 3 next to 1.5 thus getting in range to most of your and using these guys first to clear share and then enter your core to nick it after we would nap for nothing.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

205 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

zomg me pops these big heads with a needle, grow up and get a pair ffs AA, Arganon th lot  of ya, so what u beat 90 down shit loads of planets, and u mass cleared my fams spread, fair play you won now please just get over ursleves everyone gets the point. AA with ur worthless post pleae get ur head out of ur arse, cus nobody really cares.

i tried to give you all fun, as all u wanted is to nap everyone and farm all round, i put a stop to that and made u guys fight.
like i said grow a pair

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: -2

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol Lee, you guys napped everyone by day 10 of the round almost....we had 3 naps and a core agreement up until like 10 days ago.  Those 3 being with 90,85, and your fam so stop sitting there and lying.  And made us fight?  We were cancelling on 90 anyways lol so it hardly made us fight

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

207 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

erm no we never napped everyone, we fought people then napped, just fyi there wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 0

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

yea good artic;)

And i'm Retaking My Ass Off big_smile for real

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,827
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

@Lee: once again your understanding of the english language is WAY off. I was giving your alliance a compliment!! I dont see that my post was worthless. Everything i said was true.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,512

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
113 planet(s) captured by Thor (75 %) (44 retakes).
91 planet(s) captured by Jormungand (57 %) (3 retakes).
64 planet(s) captured by Bor (85 %) (34 retakes).
18 planet(s) captured by Vidar (62 %) (2 retakes).
13 planet(s) captured by Razor8282 (43 %) (12 retakes).
10 planet(s) captured by Tyr (83 %) (10 retakes).
4 planet(s) captured by Forsete (15 %) (3 retakes).
3 planet(s) captured by Frigg (43 %) (3 retakes).
2 planet(s) captured by Asgard (50 %).
1 planet(s) captured by Yggdrasil (100 %) (1 retakes).
1 planet(s) captured by Valhalla (100 %) (1 retakes).
-------------------
257 from #4190
63 from #4191
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 320 times. 2 families and 230 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 137 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 93.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,216
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

u wish arganon, ur fam isnt going to hold any of the planets


we will stunt your infra for long enough to make us happy

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

> Artic wrote:

> u wish arganon, ur fam isnt going to hold any of the planets


we will stunt your infra for long enough to make us happy



Round is over. Nobody cares about infra anymore lol

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,216
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

214 Reply by Rin

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

this war proves pw skills > mw skills.

inb4 implying mw have skills

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol I told you repeatedly to close down MW. This is a disgrace =p

When an eor features Luster, Arganon and Artic as key attackers something is horribly wrong.

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

haha good one..

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

damn me an nolio agree 2x in 3 days whats up with that :\

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,512

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Lee:
I happend to make a infil on you ! tongue
It made me lauf a lot.
******* man you have been hit hard !

Thoes of u with inuf agents plz infil him and check it out plz.
You beeing like you are while taking such a heavy beating is odd man !:S
frankly you got to copy it twice to get it posted in forum smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

219 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

bin it hard? tongue all of my fleet i disbanded myseld except some fig that got ran this morning when my net was cut off.
rest of planets i lost r retakes or cpff'd portals, so what u beat me omg it was so hard when u had triple our eco you should be proud

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,216
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

wow, it is funny, tobi and h4e trying to hit our ports to get shares with 85 and 86.. hmmm.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

221 Reply by Arganon (edited by Arganon 13-Oct-2010 17:14:10)

  • Posts: 2,512

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Life is like a box of chocklad you never know what you gonne get ! tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 723

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

1st of all, the only thing shares are for is the first round of war... but we had one tickers with many of your bankers, and the planets you retook were raised... we lost very few of those types of planets..... and the attacks that you guys (90-91) are getting high, on are just retakes of dead planets... and i know of 2 systems that you got ran out of perfectly, one came in and ran the fleets, then another, came in and took and cleared, then the bankers are moving in with defense fleets... and you lost the system.
and i don't know of one system that we dominated that you took from us like that???????

don't touch me i am contagious........;p

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 960
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

because we got raped at first tick, and were pushed into defense.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,512

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
31 planet(s) captured by Bor (97 %) (16 retakes).
19 planet(s) captured by Razor8282 (76 %).
18 planet(s) captured by Thor (78 %) (7 retakes).
6 planet(s) captured by Jormungand (43 %) (2 retakes).
6 planet(s) captured by Frigg (40 %).
5 planet(s) captured by Yggdrasil (50 %).
-------------------
58 from #4190
27 from #4191
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 85 times. 2 families and 72 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 56 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 16.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 960
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
149 planet(s) captured by Beast (61 %) (121 retakes).
121 planet(s) captured by Borg Beast (71 %) (90 retakes).
107 planet(s) captured by Looner the Beast (68 %) (60 retakes).
70 planet(s) captured by Artic is teh Beast (50 %) (27 retakes).
52 planet(s) captured by Nightstalking Beast (63 %) (52 retakes).
36 planet(s) captured by Power Beast (55 %) (33 retakes).
10 planet(s) captured by The Old Man (91 %) (10 retakes).
8 planet(s) captured by Gay Beast (73 %) (7 retakes).
-------------------
292 from #4199
261 from #4197

of the 2 yrs tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points