• Posts: 2,512

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

I bacame confused so many targets and so little morale and time.

FACTS:
Artic in pmode
Luster without fleet and in pmode.
Lee got no share a reduced fleet and trying to do damage do hes more often failing then succseding.
most of their minor attackers jumps fleet and before the next tic they are back to doing retakes as their fleet are already gone.
All in all this is pritty much over already.
You guys put up a good fight but you where outwitted out playing and we are far more active then you guys are.

Bow gracefully admit defeat and make peace for planets so we can move on to other fams.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

177 Reply by Lee (edited by Lee 12-Oct-2010 17:01:24)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Lee got no share a reduced fleet and trying to do damage do hes more often failing then succseding.

ermi got no shares?  thats cus i allready cleared u all 1st ticks u mofo big_smile
a reduced fleet? ye i disbanded 2mil fighters, to get in range of some other people, i.e core defending and retaking for my allies, it wasnt hard to pmpode luster aswell, when he had only 17 planets lol!

all in all u have done shit to my fam except clear my my portals, which i did to you also. so dont boast otherwise smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

"id like to see you raid from range, with skill"

Yeah funny that, how did your long range raid go? Did Luster manage to kill all of Asgard's fleet leaving the rest of you guys being able to take the rest of the planets with little ease? smile

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

179 Reply by Lee (edited by Lee 12-Oct-2010 17:06:02)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

nah u guys razed ur shares which was clever smile

also "id like to see you raid from range, with skill"

by this i meant running a bankers ground from tickers and raiding from range, im not saying i have done this, this round. but im striclty pointing out arganon has done nothing except boast hes some ic god, when infact hes done pretty much nothing.
like artic, but arganon.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

180 Reply by Joor

  • Joor
  • Joor
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2,010
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Didn't 90 start with 2k planets? Look where they are now.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

181 Reply by Joor

  • Joor
  • Joor
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2,010
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
-------------------
227 from #4190
56 from #4191


---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
145 to #4190
103 to #4191
2 to #4189
1 to #4197
-------------------

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 147
  • Tag points: 104

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

I do recall that few days ago 91 had less than 1,5k planets.
Yeah, so the most boring war of all from from perspective went like this: 91 jumped, 99 jumped, attackers cleared each other. 99 ff'ed lee's ports, took 1by1, lee did similar, ping-pong battle royale + some banker planets involved by both parties, war became boring. 90 jumped, 97 jumped more - 2 intensive ticks, 97 & 99 lost fleet, 91 & 90 lost more fleet, clear of shares began, luster jumped, took deportalled banker's planets, lost fleet, sent to pmode, ping-pong battle royale, boring war is boring again.

None of the families did sustain any significant eco damage.

Arganon: "You guys put up a good fight but you where outwitted out playing and we are far more active then you guys are."

Agreed with the last part 100%, can agree about outplaying to some degree as well. Outwitted? Please read the sentence above the quote, thank you, have a nice day smile

Rhinos have poor eyesight, but with what they weigh, it`s not their problem.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: -2

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

I guess you didn't notice that JefF lost 70 planets then, Mitico.

And its pretty sad when the only move you can do is send a small attacker into a core, all it says is that you guys are pathetic and can't do anything the right away

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

184 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

erm u tried it on us also wink and mitco is in my fam josh, jeff isnt  yikes

what else is there to do josh anyway

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

185 Reply by WS IC Legend (edited by WS IC Legend 12-Oct-2010 19:57:04)

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

wrong ^^^ the sad thing is you dont prepare and defend against a LEGAL and smart strategy.

in war their are many strats, diplo, over powering strength, small enemy elite units sneaking in and doing major damage, so it is ur bad leadership for not being ready for all aspects of war in a war game.

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: -2

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol WS, go lose another pw war.

And Lee, we did not try it wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 0

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Rmao

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 299

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol...charlie...stop trying to be funny=P

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,532

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

shit i got fighterruned X(

In the fight we lost 3333 fighters
In the fight we lost 2333 fighters


luckly i managed to hide my fighters after those 2 attacks.... i wonder how much more lee would have runned my poor fighters...

Tobi

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

190 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

hehe smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 147
  • Tag points: 104

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

RickyBobby, yeah, forgot to mention that, as i hadn't noticed that when wrote the comment.
It's a perfectly legitimate tactic to infiltrate a small guy and raid bankers, half was done well, the other half was done well by you. It was well used in the old days and was only congratulated by the loser fam to the victor fam, no matter was it a full success by the raiders or a perfect defence by the bankers, so i don't get it why are you talking trash about it.
It seems that any action made by opposing fam is called dirty, cheap, shitty, pathetic or [insert any WS quote here], whether it would be this situation, or opping, or any other scenario that may come in mind.
Get over yourself, you won, stop trying to diminish your opponent, it doesn't add you any honour.

Rhinos have poor eyesight, but with what they weigh, it`s not their problem.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol i didnt think 90/91 would get owned so badly yikes

i have serious questions about this war

1) why was arctic jumped and no other attacker?
2) why do some IC players think luster is any good?
3) why did anubis not jump either?
4) how could 90 allow arctic to use all there savings? i mean they didnt even jump a 2nd attacker?

this is truely a white wash.

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

193 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol i didnt think 90/91 would get owned so badly yikes

explain to me for a second where my fam got pwned? get real man post facts not fiction.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

194 Reply by Kai

  • Kai
  • Kai
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 782

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

We had to jump one attacker because of the lack of resources.
Artic was jumped because he thought he was the best, gave him a chance, and now we could say we regret that but I dont. He did his best but the difference of fleet was just to big plus the luck 97/99 had is a factor aswell.

You guys just played it well, thats all wink

''Everything is easy, Unless you make it difficult''
The Legend always returns

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

195 Reply by Joor

  • Joor
  • Joor
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2,010
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

'Artic was jumped because he thought he was the best'

Putting the fate into one man's hands.


Admit defeat will only gain respect right now.
Cheers Kai.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,040
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

At least Artic gave it a go, Hats off to Artic for his heart and soul smile

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: -2

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

I told DragonSoup and Tobi this before jumps.

<Alien|LoL> The only reason I could see them actually jumping Artic as a main guy is that Moul has a history of when he knows he can't win a war to jump an idiot with the fleet
<Alien|LoL> So that then when they die he has a scapegoat
<Alien|LoL> He's done it twice before

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

198 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

do i get a nap now or what X( i wanna go inactive, meh

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: -2

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Talk to Portgas

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,532

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

even if 90 would have jumped somoene else with the same fleet as artic they would have lost...

jumping just fighters and some soldiers....
he might have been able to get my fighters.. but then?
he couldn't breake any ground

Tobi

0 Dislike 0 Post Points