![]PW[ Forever](https://imperialconflict.com/forum/img/avatars/42357.jpg)
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
Yay Render! 
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
The forums have moved!
Click here to use the new forums. Enjoy!
66/74 verses 72/75 (Page 12 of 16)
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 66/74 verses 72/75
Posts: 276 to 300 of 395
- HoaD
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
So who's winning?
[HoaD][Toadies] luv zeh mushr|o_0|ms! 
Statistics/IC Monitor: IC Monitor By HoaD/Toadies
Tools: Toadies Tools
IC-wiki: Toadies IC-wiki
Statistics/IC Monitor: IC Monitor By HoaD/Toadies
Tools: Toadies Tools
IC-wiki: Toadies IC-wiki
- WS IC Legend
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
well if ur asking who is going to win that was decided when I decided to come to PW 
its just waiting for the fulfillment of the prophecy at this point.
I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.
![Flash[light]ning](https://imperialconflict.com/forum/img/avatars/29283.gif)
- Flash[light]ning
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
WS i love your confidence, its unmatched 
let's see if you can back it up
- Satanic Spawn
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
you wanna know who the real underdog in this war is? the one who is going to rape everyone?!?!
Fromund! he is gonna jump so big with his -30% attack and still hammer 72/75. a non attacker beating up on attackers! its gonna be epic!
Solis - #7872
- Pharaoh Metrex
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
*gets popcorn*
"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"
Metrex
Metrex
- Flash[light]ning
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
*has already eaten around a tonne of popcorn since the thread was opened X( now am a fat bastard!
- Duck
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
this is taking forever. I hate decay, seems like such a waste.
Quack.
- Pharaoh Metrex
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
Agreed lol
only a few more days now
"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"
Metrex
Metrex
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
haha I am sure with only your decay I could raise an invincible fleet
289 06-Oct-2010 01:05:35 (edited by Rainin 06-Oct-2010 01:06:33)
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
> WS IC Legend wrote:
> wait a minute
where is the "skill" u talked about?
or is it really "only" who has the most fleet?
and its not a matter of no life its a matter that my life allows me to live life and also sit with laptop on next to me 24/7 while i do my job/life.
but im sure you said it takes more than fleet it takes "skill" so I assumed u guys were so much more "skilled" according to the message u sent me about how you out skilled render with much less fleet.
was that not true or are u saying WS has not only much more skill so u would have to be equal in fleet or more to compete with me?
and surely you know this is one of the tactics of war.
you see my plan all along was to out do you in gc and keep even in ressies then use my gc to kill ur chance of getting ressies thus my plan prevails and ur plan or lack of one fails.
And i didnt say i outskilled render i said we outjumped them by alot.. expecting them to plan a jump better and they didnt really plan one well at all.
Never once have i sat around and bought off market constantly for a war, not that it matters. And i never said just because you had more fleet i would lose, just that the chances of winning with a much smaller fleet are very low, ASSUMING our skill levels are similiar.
"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"
<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock
<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
> Render wrote:
> "but im sure you said it takes more than fleet it takes "skill" so I assumed u guys were so much more "skilled" according to the message u sent me about how you out skilled render with much less fleet."
lol thats crap rainin, you outjumped me 2 tics before cancelation date, you killed me because I hadnt still jumped, then lost my shares and couldnt protect my bankers, or it was templare?? i cant remember right, but you started the war 2 tics before it was settled, just that, and yes you coulda win anyway without doing low moves because our fam had a shit of saves. That round history is long and complicated, but it-s history, ok? ;y???:??????
Actually what happened was your allies family delayed their jump of one of their attackers, and you jumped ontime to fight me. You weren't expecting however templare to be attacking you the same tick as me, so you werent prepared for that at all.
Also, i said i would have beat your whole family not bragging about just skill, just that i had so much more fleet and your families jump was so poorly planned and so weak that it would be easy for me to run all of your fleets. Btw render, i copy pasted to my family and alliance an attack made by you where you clearly crashed ALL of your fleet on my 2 mil figs. It was proven when the tick after you lost ALMOST ALL OF YOUR NW. Now render why don't you just stay out of the conversation, thanks.
"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"
<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock
<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock
i guess
- Rin
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
ws with double fleet vs silvarian should be a fair fight due to skill disparity.
<parrot> there is also the odd possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?
- Pharaoh Metrex
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
Rawr Brett is mine!!!!! rawrrr!!!
"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"
Metrex
Metrex
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
WS, dont get me wrong, we will fight you and we will try to beat you no matter how much fleet you have, one of the things that makes attackers and IC players in general good is the ability to adapt well under any situation. I was just saying i figured it would be more equal since our incomes were similiar. Wasn't expecting a gung ho market battle, wasn't saying it was a bad tactic or anything of course its a good one if it gets you the advantage, but buying off the market doesn't take skill WS who are you kidding.. it just takes being active.
"YOU DARE QUESTION THE WISDOM OF THE WARCHIEF?"
<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock
<Parrot> cause i am a massive faggot
<Parrot> and i love the cock
- Satanic Spawn
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
actually it took 5 minutes for me and him to buy it out. and it will take another 5 minutes if it looks as if it might start dropping to ensure it doesnt. so no it doesnt take being active.
yes it was a good tactic and there are plenty more tactics that can be used to sway this war towards either side. simply put every family will try to get an advantage in some way that is just how it is going to be.
and for the record i just wanna ask one question. could we please get someone who is NOT n00b (aka parrot) to make comments about WS if they are going to be negative (or me for that matter...) as it is soooooo tiring listening to a n00b talk as if he is someone or knows what the hell he is talking about
Solis - #7872
- Rin
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
my ic attacker tier rating
god tier
----------
Parrot/Rin/Lyvidian
high tier
----------
mid tier
-----------
low tier
-----------
shit tier
----------
everyone else
<parrot> there is also the odd possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?
297 06-Oct-2010 01:39:40 (edited by WS IC Legend 06-Oct-2010 01:41:51)
- WS IC Legend
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
only twice as much parrot is all i need to equal silvarian who has "never" lost a 1vs1 attacker?
i was thinking i needed 4x as much
but at least if i win i will have accomplished a few things.
1. beat an attacker never beaten b4 1vs1
2. beat an attacker with so much skill it takes me 2x as much fleet to beat.
3. get to lmao for a few days at n00blio and others that think i am unskilled thus a win will not look good on the "record" books for silvarian.
my ic attacker tier rating
IC Legend
----------
WhiteShadow
god tier
----------
Parrot/Rin/Lyvidian
high tier
----------
mid tier
-----------
low tier
-----------
shit tier
----------
everyone else
I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.
- Satanic Spawn
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
key note there parrot...you said "my" in that sentence. and we all know that n00bs opinions dont actually mean anything. when you do something worth speaking of mention it to one of my subordinates and they will mention it to me. as you obviously are subordinate to them.
Solis - #7872
- Rin
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
WS IC Legend wrote:
only twice as much parrot is all i need to equal silvarian who has "never" lost a 1vs1 attacker?
i was thinking i needed 4x as much
but at least if i win i will have accomplished a few things.
1. beat an attacker never beaten b4 1vs1
2. beat an attacker with so much skill it takes me 2x as much fleet to beat.
3. get to lmao for a few days at n00blio and others that think i am unskilled thus a win will not look good on the "record" books for silvarian.my ic forum trolling rating
IC Legend
----------WhiteShadow
god tier
----------
Parrot/Rin/Lyvidianhigh tier
----------mid tier
-----------low tier
-----------shit tier
----------
everyone else
fixt for you ws
<parrot> there is also the odd possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?
- WS IC Legend
- Player
- Offline
Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.
Posts: 276 to 300 of 395
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 66/74 verses 72/75
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.