Re: 66/74 verses 72/75
82 w@s top 3 when we be@t them ur f@m be@t top 6to10 f@ms only ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 66/74 verses 72/75
82 w@s top 3 when we be@t them ur f@m be@t top 6to10 f@ms only ![]()
> WS IC Legend wrote:
> lol th@ts the only re@son i pl@y r@inin ![]()
@yomamama - your f@m be@t who this round lol
I realize that's the only reason you play, and what you said thus far hasn't bothered me until today, when you acted like you beat me in that war. We barely fought and that's a fact. Argue that and you're really stupid man.. sorry to say. Your alliance was better, you won the war, nobody is arguing that, but what you stated as more of a statement of facts was very biased and clearly meant to make you look better then me when your skills have not been truely tested against mine. Just let the next war decide WS, if you win i will let you trash talk freely as much as you want for you will clearly have beaten me.
I think we are much the same in that if we are truely beaten we will be humble and not make excuses, or am i wrong in my assumption WS?
> yomamama wrote:
> 82 = joke, no offense to them ![]()
Pretty much.. i mean flashy is good when hes active and ice is okay, but their whole fam was inactive... and tr was so inactive he might as well not of even been in the family...
> Rainin wrote:
Okay first you act all bad and now you're sucking WS penis? Legend of IC... The real legends of IC dont need to talk shit. I can name some of you really feel it necessary.
Like i said dude you started the Name calling and chest beating, I just said you got beat by WS, but ok I'll restate what happened so you can understand it, Our Alliance Beat yours, WS, Hydro_P and nightwish out played your Fam because we had Superior Infra, Activity and Skill. We destroyed your Allies quickly then were going to totally destroy your Fam, we NAPed and then you dumped your old allies for Mizzle because they were stronger. (poor Flash).
lol, Rainin Attackers hardly ever go head to head, so Leader vs Leader is actually a better way to explain what I'm saying, and in this instance (the First war we had) WS beat you.
> Forever wrote:
> > Rainin wrote:
Okay first you act all bad and now you're sucking WS penis? Legend of IC... The real legends of IC dont need to talk shit. I can name some of you really feel it necessary.
Like i said dude you started the Name calling and chest beating, I just said you got beat by WS, but ok I'll restate what happened so you can understand it, Our Alliance Beat yours, WS, Hydro_P and nightwish out played your Fam because we had Superior Infra, Activity and Skill. We destroyed your Allies quickly then were going to totally destroy your Fam, we NAPed and then you dumped your old allies for Mizzle because they were stronger. (poor Flash).
Yes, of course in a 2v1 fight, 2 families against mine with a small attacker to sneak in my core i would of eventually lost. But can you name ANYONE that wouldn't lose? There are some things you cant prevent, and just because i was in an unpreventable situation doesn't mean i lost to WS, that's all im saying.
> Forever wrote:
> lol, Rainin Attackers hardly ever go head to head, so Leader vs Leader is actually a better way to explain what I'm saying, and in this instance (the First war we had) WS beat you.
Actually attackers go head to head all the time in share wars, and sometimes even without share wars though its much more boring and less skill-based.
You can't really say he's a better leader then me either considering we started with 3 people and you had 5 and then 6 shortly after that. You can ask anyone i'm one of the best leaders around, even if they wouldn't call me one of the best attackers nobody can say im a bad leader. ![]()
lol if i lose there will be no excuse, in f@ct i usu@lly help in the tr@sh t@lking @bout myelf ![]()
but me losing dont h@ppen enuf for me to get much pr@ctice doing th@t ![]()
> WS IC Legend wrote:
> lol if i lose there will be no excuse, in f@ct i usu@lly help in the tr@sh t@lking @bout myelf ![]()
but me losing dont h@ppen enuf for me to get muh pr@ctice doing th@t ![]()
Same here WS, i hope you're as good as you think you are because i like a good challenge, and if you are then i will give you props. I just give credit where i feel its due. And i think so far you've proved to me that you are a good leader, but your attacking skills i have yet to see firsthand. And by that i really mean a large scale share war ![]()
Your @s are getting kinda annoying though tbh ![]()
my A key is broke so i would hAve to copy n pAste the A too much work ![]()
> yomamama wrote:
> "Rainin Attackers hardly ever go head to head, so Leader vs Leader is actually a better way to explain what I'm saying"
re-read what you wrote? it's always attacker vs attacker in a war lolz.
lol, first few ticks maybe, then its Banker Rape ftw! ![]()
> WS IC Legend wrote:
> my A key is broke so i would hAve to copy n pAste the A too much work ![]()
Oh alright, i thought it was intentional trolling lol.
Yawn...
> Forever wrote:
> > yomamama wrote:
> "Rainin Attackers hardly ever go head to head, so Leader vs Leader is actually a better way to explain what I'm saying"
re-read what you wrote? it's always attacker vs attacker in a war lolz.
lol, first few ticks maybe, then its Banker Rape ftw! ![]()
Yeah but the first few ticks usually decide the war.
In a War like this, it probably will.
> WS IC Legend wrote:
> my A key is broke so i would hAve to copy n pAste the A too much work ![]()
lol
write "ei" instead
my ei key is broke so i would reither heive to copy ein peiste the ei too much workei
Where is the trashtalk to me?
Kinda deserved some trash talk!
Cant Trash a guy that loves Female Breasts as much as I do.
Nope,still wanking on youre fam pictures mizzle, cant trash talk to you ![]()
So the new attack strat is to post cleavage on your family pic ftw?
ofcorse.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 66/74 verses 72/75
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.