Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

Tryme wrote:

Parrot you are mistaking... rainin is silvarian not rain...

for all i know rainin is 100 times better and i'm not so sure WS is gonna be able to beat him wink

thanks for the insight tryme, i was confused by their similar name.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

52

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

for me Rainin and Rain are the same, both are in my blacklist

*this said with all my love*

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

tryme ure an idiot if you can actually make the comment that ANYONE is 100x better than WS. retards like you should just stfu seriously.

if you wanna make a comment about someone being better than another person atleast make it more believable. however, you will be hard pressed to find better attackers in this war than myself, nightwish, and WS. taking nothing away from the enemy alliance as i know they have quality skill in attacking. i couldnt sit here and say they are better than us as i just dont think its true.

Solis - #7872

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

maybe you should read tryme's sentence again, he said raining is 100 times better than rain. I sense insecurity.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

> Metrex wrote:

> Anubis you owe me a round.... lol

And arganon it was a pnap until a certain date... go be dumb in your mw thread please.



I agree with Arganon. Its not a pnap. It was just a nap with a set cancellation date.

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

> Tryme wrote:

> Parrot you are mistaking... rainin is silvarian not rain...

for all i know rainin is 100 times better and i'm not so sure WS is gonna be able to beat him wink




lol, already beat him once this round, actually destroyed his first alliance.

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

Genghis seems to have a hard on trying to compete with WS's bullshit he posts on these forums.
" Anyone who says they are 100times better then my bf can seriously stfu " 

lmao

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

coming from someone with no war in their name.... means a lot.

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

59

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

let the trashtalk start big_smile  we need some spice in pw!

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

lol its funny how i @m @ble to y@nk peoples ch@ins like simply not mentioning silv@ri@n's n@me smile

but @ll I c@n s@y is h@ve your best g@me on @nd be re@dy for 24hr round the clock @ction from me @nd hydrop bec@use we @re used to it smile

@nd like w@s @lre@dy s@id we be@t them this round @nd could h@ve ruined their round like we did every other f@m we w@rred but they were sm@rt enuf to see the writing on the w@ll @nd submit @nd live to fight @nother d@y.

but in seriousness silv@ri@n w@s me best comp@tition this round by f@r.

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

@_@

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

Its a cardgame metrex, However i wouldnt expect you to understand such things.

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

yes metrex dont t@lk @bout his c@rd g@me he loves pl@ying old m@id smile

@nd he wishes he h@d @ bf to comp@re with someone else's but d@ddy grounded him for going @fter little boys.

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

Isn't that you WS the IC pedo sat behind his computer screen at 50+ years old?

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

i wasnt aware kt was 12 years old

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

Coudnt be bothered reading the last few posts of WS, ot cuz they might be full of trash, but teh @ instead of a is very annoying to read :s

I survived the Test? of 12-4-03, anyone remember that?

67 (edited by WS IC Legend 28-Sep-2010 13:36:20)

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

NO "no w@r" not behind it but beside it @nd you must know something @bout pedo @ctivities so is th@t the w@y you do it you sit "behind" your l@ptop so you c@n do the d@nce c@lled the "pedo with your libido" while looking @t your young bf's?

@nd for Cr@zyOne   @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


just for @ side note

75/72 combined NW for b@nkers @nd Resourcers

b@nkers = 7,555,206
Resourcers = 3,266,340

66/74 combined NW for b@nkers @nd Resourcers

b@nkers = 7,679,754
Resourcers = 3,647,553

so for now 74/66 le@d in both but with the visions 66 m@kes much more gc then they do @nd much more iron smile

but this is @ re@lly good m@tchup on p@per @nyw@y tongue

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

Too m@ny w@nkers!

69

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

0M6 I w@5n7 r

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

omg i wasnt referring to that when talking about trashtalk

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

71

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

X(

that was too easy

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

7#@7 w#

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

this war should be good

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

> Forever wrote:

> > Tryme wrote:

> Parrot you are mistaking... rainin is silvarian not rain...

for all i know rainin is 100 times better and i'm not so sure WS is gonna be able to beat him wink




lol, already beat him once this round, actually destroyed his first alliance.



inactivity did that for you guys tongue

gl to all, FIGHT!

75 (edited by CrazyOne 28-Sep-2010 18:28:55)

Re: 66/74 verses 72/75

WS, did you just admit to doing visisons on 75/72, whilst you have nap, coz in normal nap terms those count as succesfull opps, and compo can be asked wink

I survived the Test? of 12-4-03, anyone remember that?