Re: Europeans and Languages
german (native)
english pretty well
a bit french
i learned latin at school for 6 years
basic japanses (hiragana/katagana/some kanji/basic conversation)
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → Europeans and Languages
german (native)
english pretty well
a bit french
i learned latin at school for 6 years
basic japanses (hiragana/katagana/some kanji/basic conversation)
I speak:
dutch (native)
French
Chinese (mandarin)
and a little
english
German
and a very little:
Spanish
I understand:
a little of the scandinavian languages except for finish
This makes it possible for me to communicate with a lot of people in there native language and most people in there second.
my opinion about it:
For me its ok if the world gradually started to speak English. I consider that a good thing. I would remove some inconsistencies and exceptions though.
@avo:
So you start of with saying "some europeans" you heared consider Americans ignorant for some reason. Why would it even bother us? It is not representative for all europeans who consider of many individuals with different meanings you can't know even with polls.
I personally do not consider Americans ignorant as whole or anything like that and surely won't put languages as an argument.
edit: I put german in the "little" group altough I understand it rather well
In addition to proximity and the lack of these ocean massive body of water things I keep hearing about, the numbers themselves have an effect. European nations by themselves don't have the populations or economic incentives to produce as many and varied media productions as English-speaking America does. An English-only speaking American can enjoy many more films than someone who only speaks Suomi, for instance. The same applies for all print/audio/televised media. English-speakers have more available to them in English than is available in most other languages by themselves, incentivizing English speakers less to learn additional languages than those who speak languages common to less people.
I do see additional value in learning more than one language, in addition to the media garbage (and absolutely beautiful art) one can consume. For instance, learning another language even moderately well helps one understand his/her own language considerably better and is supposedly great for intellectual capacity and growth.
Native:
English
Dutch
Turkish(though my vocabulary is lacking for complex conversations)
Conversational:
French
German(though it's improving)
little to nothing:
spanish
> V.Kemp wrote:
> In addition to proximity and the lack of these ocean massive body of water things I keep hearing about, the numbers themselves have an effect. European nations by themselves don't have the populations or economic incentives to produce as many and varied media productions as English-speaking America does. An English-only speaking American can enjoy many more films than someone who only speaks Suomi, for instance. The same applies for all print/audio/televised media. English-speakers have more available to them in English than is available in most other languages by themselves, incentivizing English speakers less to learn additional languages than those who speak languages common to less people.
I do see additional value in learning more than one language, in addition to the media garbage (and absolutely beautiful art) one can consume. For instance, learning another language even moderately well helps one understand his/her own language considerably better and is supposedly great for intellectual capacity and growth.
i will say that 90% of my desire to learn another language (which hasn't been enough to get me to learn another language yet) is the arts. I much rather read a famous poet or author's works without translations.
the point was to see how many europeans spoke non-european languages.
Define european languages, english, french, spanish, russian and even dutch is used outside of europe as well. The point is that you learn the language you are likely to need sooner than languages you won't.
I see the point you are trying to make, and it makes sense. However, you should not try to compare situations you can't compare (nor should Europeans really). You learn languages because it's benefitial to do so for you. Only few people learn languages they won't ever need.
all languages are used outside their native area... defining european languages is unnecessary, its obvious the meaning. English, Spanish, French, Estonian, Russian, Finish, Italian, ect are european languages. Mandarin, Japanese, Korean, Zulu, Navajo, ect are non-european languages. I am not going to bother trying to create a definition for european language that is bullshit proof; everyone should know what is meant.
i was not trying to make a point with the original post, i was genuinely interested in how common it is for europeans to know non-european languages.
this being the politics forum, a simple poll wouldn't have been appropriate, so i had to use a european/american rivalry in the thread to make it political and to motivate people to post in it.
You could however made a thread in general without the "european/american rivalry".
my point exactly wfs
@avo:
the point was to see how many europeans spoke non-European languages.
how can forum posters of politics in IC be representative? Most -I am an exception- know very good English to start with. The group is narrow and there are only a few people inside it.
"I am not going to bother trying to create a definition for European language that is bullshit proof; everyone should know what is meant."
But his argument still stands, some European languages are widespread. So maybe clarify what it is you want to prove or investigate?
*tries not to watch Paul beat a dead horse*
Asking what European languages are and pointing out that some are widespread completely misses the point. ![]()
The initial post inquired about Europeans here and the languages they speak. That Dutch is also spoken in X, Y, and Z former colonies has nothing to do with it. And asking for clarification of what is a European language, off-topic as it is, is additionally ridiculous. If you can't figure out that English, Spanish, French, German, Dutch, Italian, etc are European and Mandarin or the 50,000 Indian dialects etc are not... Yeah.
So now you know what I meant, as well as that it was figurative. Imagine what someone who didn't have a good working knowledge of English and common expressions would think. Now that would be a lively forum.
If we are not counting European languages (since they are in close proximity) then Americans cannot count Spanish and French since they are in close proximity to Mexico and Quebec.
Outside of Spanish, French and English the only useful languages to learn would be Chinese Mandarin and Japanese and I doubt many Europeans speak this, same as I doubt many Americans do.
That's a weird comparison. Mexico isn't half as close to me as a dozen other nations are to every European. But an irrelevant comparison, as well, so nevermind. ![]()
Seems like Mexico extends beyond its borders these days... I probably could get far knowing Spanish but it pisses me off that it is so. I took a couple semesters of Korean and that would really help me at church as well as spanish.
Don't knock the American-European rivalry! It powers this site!
http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/TheYell/A-ERivalry.jpg
"Asking what European languages are and pointing out that some are widespread completely misses the point."
No it does not. It partly explains why europeans don't know much languages that does not also occur in EU borders. This is relevant for his statement -also in the initial post- that europeans don't know languages not from the EU.
"The initial post inquired about Europeans here and the languages they speak."
We know.
"That Dutch is also spoken in X, Y, and Z former colonies has nothing to do with it."
I have the same reaction as above.
"And asking for clarification of what is a European language, off-topic as it is, is additionally ridiculous."
No it is not. It is a question for clarifying his initial statement, and a way to point something out.
"So now you know what I meant, as well as that it was figurative"
I got the picture. My English is maybe the worse of all forum posters here, but not that bad.
WAIT! HOLD THE THREAD!
@Avogadro:
Does "Klingon" count?
Or Elvish?
Might I point out that a lot of spanish is spoken in the US, pockets of french/creole languages exist in Louisiana, there's french spoken in maine, native american languages, hawaiian etc.
Because the US is such a melting pot, most immigrants just gradually adopted english as their language. (they were uprooted anyhow)
Seriously, does Klingon count?
Imperial Forum → Politics → Europeans and Languages
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.