lol, I guess there's some room for debate between "Targeting a liberal shithead" and the bombing of Sweden, ain't it Yell?

The good news is that, in between, Fox finally revamped their comments system and we can now sort by popularity and ratings (and avoid the annoying double or triple posting), making it easier to find the good stuff!

If Sweden harbors an enemy combatant actively getting Afghans who want to fight the corrupt thugs in their country killed (Thus getting US soldiers killed ultimately by harming their war effort), I have no problem with the United States killing them. In fact, my only problem is with the United States NOT killing the people who actively seek dead United States citizens.

It's a shame the US' leaders are all gutless pansies. It's getting US citizens killed. What would Sweden do about it? They'd stop harboring those killing US Citizens and hand them over to US custody to avoid getting bombed more, is what they would do. They wouldn't have any other options.

Good jab at the Tea Party people, Golk. Now we know you're not a troll. I thought they were protesting ridiculous spending, huge deficits, and cutting police and firefighters while funding things like opera houses and renovations to buildings that haven't been used in years and aren't going to be reopened. I must have missed who was using fear and anger at the Tea Parties. Can you fill me in? I just remember Nancy Pelosi ignorantly warning that Tea Parties were violent while ignoring socialist violence which has been going on for decades.