Re: Are you guys really gonna go through with this 4vs1 war? :/

Hookers wrote:

Still trying to get all of this figured out.   40 & 41 were both gangbanging 31 (25's ally), so 25 breaks their nap and goes after 40/41 to try to keep their ally 31 from getting raped, right?  Why was it 2 vs 1 to begin with on 31?  Could either 40 or 41 not been able to handle it themselves?   

Then..  31/25 no longer have any fight left with infra gone, fleet gone, and 40/41 now is just taking easy defenseless planets.  35 is all over in those systems so 40/41 start clearing 35 out "while still at war" with 25/31.   43 then decides "hey, they aren't really at war or they wouldn't BOTH be hitting our allies 35 ?   So 43 says "You know... this nap is over, we will war in 48 ticks" and 40/41, the 2 fams that started all this by doubleteaming 31 say it's not fair for 43 to cancel nap?   

/me still can't get this all straight!

40 was not napped with 31 but we also told them to stay out and keep it 1v1, which they did, and we would let them know when 25 cancelled the nap so they could join in (how naive we were...). they were jumping infra when lee broke nap on us. so there goes your whole post.

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Re: Are you guys really gonna go through with this 4vs1 war? :/

I say amen to that..

''Everything is easy, Unless you make it difficult''
The Legend always returns

53 (edited by [Lemming] HuMaNiTy 08-Jul-2010 15:13:47)

Re: Are you guys really gonna go through with this 4vs1 war? :/

oh another moaner thread. imperial and glue go quit ic if you cant take being owned. thanks.

I Dont Care About Spots on My Apples, Just Leave Me the Birds and the Bees

Re: Are you guys really gonna go through with this 4vs1 war? :/

Humanity, you're posts are again kinda stupid.
i havent been moaning.
Hookers are you in any of those 4 families you just mention? or in 43/35  alliance?
If not, come to find me on mirc and ill explain everything in detail, cus you seem to be a total idiot.

/query glue.. buhahah

Haters gonna hate!

Re: Are you guys really gonna go through with this 4vs1 war? :/

/queer glue*

2011 IC League Fantasy Football Champion
2012 IC League Fantasy Football Runner Up
2013 IC League Fantasy Football Champion

http://www.ic-wiki.com/index.php?title=Gondor

Re: Are you guys really gonna go through with this 4vs1 war? :/

@thirdrock

"40 was not napped with 31 but we also told them to stay out and keep it 1v1, which they did, and we would let them know when 25 cancelled the nap so they could join in (how naive we were...). they were jumping infra when lee broke nap on us. so there goes your whole post."

40 and 31 were naped tongue
until 31 "accedently" killed 40 pop a few days after 25 did broke nap

Tobi

57 (edited by [Inactive] Sir C00kie 08-Jul-2010 16:55:36)

Re: Are you guys really gonna go through with this 4vs1 war? :/

No we didn't.

As far as I was aware:

2 days after 25 broke and when 40 broke on them, they asked my opers to op 40. My opers op'd 40's cf bankers pop........I told everyone to stop. 40 did not seek or ask for any compensation and "voided" the nap hours later after jumping aleph.

Siri! How long till Cookies ready? mad

Re: Are you guys really gonna go through with this 4vs1 war? :/

Matrix wrote:

@thirdrock

"40 was not napped with 31 but we also told them to stay out and keep it 1v1, which they did, and we would let them know when 25 cancelled the nap so they could join in (how naive we were...). they were jumping infra when lee broke nap on us. so there goes your whole post."

40 and 31 were naped tongue
until 31 "accedently" killed 40 pop a few days after 25 did broke nap

Right, i do remember that now. sorry, my bad. so yes, it was a 1v1 then.

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Re: Are you guys really gonna go through with this 4vs1 war? :/

> thirdrock wrote:

>

Hookers wrote:

Still trying to get all of this figured out.   40 & 41 were both gangbanging 31 (25's ally), so 25 breaks their nap and goes after 40/41 to try to keep their ally 31 from getting raped, right?  Why was it 2 vs 1 to begin with on 31?  Could either 40 or 41 not been able to handle it themselves?   

Then..  31/25 no longer have any fight left with infra gone, fleet gone, and 40/41 now is just taking easy defenseless planets.  35 is all over in those systems so 40/41 start clearing 35 out "while still at war" with 25/31.   43 then decides "hey, they aren't really at war or they wouldn't BOTH be hitting our allies 35 ?   So 43 says "You know... this nap is over, we will war in 48 ticks" and 40/41, the 2 fams that started all this by doubleteaming 31 say it's not fair for 43 to cancel nap?   

/me still can't get this all straight!

40 was not napped with 31 but we also told them to stay out and keep it 1v1, which they did, and we would let them know when 25 cancelled the nap so they could join in (how naive we were...). they were jumping infra when lee broke nap on us. so there goes your whole post.

Thanks - I thought it was 2vs1 to begin with (Filled me in on the info!)

Everyone needs Hookers in their Family  !!!