Sounds to me like 25 and 43 were talking way too much about things they shouldn't be discussing, not my call to call it an IA or not.

But yes, it's a 4v1, as 41 dropped their NW, so they can't really get hit, but then again noone in 40 is playing anymore, as we've lost 300 planets in the last 24 hours, and noone is going to retale them.

Noone said what 43 is doing is against the official rules, but as a community, and long time IC vet, i can't remember a time i seen a fam pull such a low move.

It's fine, it really is -- I don't care, there are other games, this move by those involved has forced out 6 people (Long time IC vets as well) to stop playing IC after this round that i know of, maybe more than that.

I'm only here reply as my ship is taking too long to mine asteroids in Eve Online, need something to do ---

Once SC2 is live i'll be happy again, with IC all but forgotten.

163 to #3935
63 to #3931
50 to #3943
20 to #3925
-------------------
We have been beaten 296 times. 4 families and 292 planets involved.
We actually lost 280 planet(s) in total. At least we were able to retake 12.

I'd call that a 4v1

Looks like 43 is just getting started.

"Tobi, are you honestly going to tell me it wasn't going to be a farm?  Anubis was inactive and cookie was their only attacker left.  You think Cookie was gonna fight off all your attackers?  I think not.  Would have been a tough battle for a couple days and then a farm."

so your point is that we could have had farmed 31?
or your point is that noone should hit inactiv top 5 fams?
is that an attempt to justify 25 nap breake?  because there allies lacked attackers they had the right to breake nap?

i fail to see your point

we also could have had farmed other fam in the galaxy... so we are farmers because we could have had done something?
we also could have broke naps..  are we napbreakers now?

and for the record we weren't gona farm 31...
why should we farm a fam that didn't had done anything dishonorable back then?

"But hey, we haven't been given credit for anything we've done this round. Forget that we've fought every fam in the galaxy at some point or another, keep our skirmishes quick and kept infra going because of our efficiency with fleets. "

and thats why you first in nw and size.   dooh
and since people cannot see your fam news... nor do most care.. they give you only credit for how you behaved towards them...  so having a nice clean war with a fam ussally gives you credit from that fam...  setting up an 4 vs 2  wont give you any credit from anyone in those involved fams.   

"I had Lee and Glue tell me the other wasn't giving naps to the other fam, so consensus says this war will last until EOR.  The fact you wanted to nap my ally is moot because of this.  It would have meant you would have had more shares to lose in the war.  Either way, you were screwed."

do you have to nap a fam to stop a fight?
or can you disengage a other way?
hell look at my dam planet list and think about the fact why i have so many planets in one area... and why 25 has no portal in the whole area... and why i not did raid all over 25 systems creating more and more shared.

if we were either way screwed i don't get why you could not wait?
(oh thnx for finnally admiting that this isn't a fair fight atm)

seriosly as more you post as less i get that fact

hehe, supertroll strikes again

> lmperial wrote:

> Oxygen, you havn't seen our fam forum or our IRC chat.

So shut the fk up you ignorant retard.

They have -all- bitched about it, i'm just one of the few willing or stupid enough to say something in Uni.

Stop trying to elevate yourself, your trash, and always will be trash, your win is empty, as is your skull.

-Your- -Opinion- -Means- -Nothing-

-Enjoy- -pmode-

Don't worry guys there is always next round guys

40/41 we can always win next round

question, at end of round do you get 3 drafts again?

Imperial...just stop posting in uni...then at least uni will be peaceful.

stick to ur retirement plans

> dona88 wrote:

> Imperial...just stop posting in uni...then at least uni will be peaceful.

stick to ur retirement plans

Done --deleted---

Good bye IC, this will be my last post ever.

Take care those who will continue to play.

Still trying to get all of this figured out.   40 & 41 were both gangbanging 31 (25's ally), so 25 breaks their nap and goes after 40/41 to try to keep their ally 31 from getting raped, right?  Why was it 2 vs 1 to begin with on 31?  Could either 40 or 41 not been able to handle it themselves?   

Then..  31/25 no longer have any fight left with infra gone, fleet gone, and 40/41 now is just taking easy defenseless planets.  35 is all over in those systems so 40/41 start clearing 35 out "while still at war" with 25/31.   43 then decides "hey, they aren't really at war or they wouldn't BOTH be hitting our allies 35 ?   So 43 says "You know... this nap is over, we will war in 48 ticks" and 40/41, the 2 fams that started all this by doubleteaming 31 say it's not fair for 43 to cancel nap?   

/me still can't get this all straight!

Can I just add that as of week 8 last year, except for 2 attacks in week 15 my family (31) haven't attacked 40.

Can I also add that the only attacks going on between 31 and 41 are for 2 or 3 systems in s1 and even then it's only 1 player out of my fam who is ping ponging those planets.

Just saying
Last edited by [Inactive] Sir C00kie

> Azora wrote:

> Can I just add that as of week 8 last year, except for 2 attacks in week 15 my family (31) haven't attacked 40.

Can I also add that the only attacks going on between 31 and 41 are for 2 or 3 systems in s1 and even then it's only 1 player out of my fam who is ping ponging those planets.

Just saying
Last edited by [Inactive] Sir C00kie

Siri! How long till Cookies ready?