What does their moving at the same time have to do with C?

I'm not following what you think you've established, because you mentioned a bullet or other projectile, and their energy is never distributed faster than C, whether you tie a string to it or get hit by or anything.

The only thing you've proven is that you can jump to conclusions.  If you had anything of substance you'd be able to explain clearly how it disproves relativity theory. "The energy will reach both ends at the same time if you start it at the middle! OMG!" isn't much of a show stopper for relativity theory. It's more like duh.

Are you saying that such a tube transmits the kinetic energy faster than C? Citation?

why i this in politics ?
*physics noob <- that was aimed at meself
*runs away <- hence i ran away

For Kemp the ignorant:

Imagine a pipe 1.001 light years in length.

Normally if you push or pull on the pipe (asuming a device existed that could manipulate that much mass) there would be flexing along the distance nullifying the effort.

This is proof supporting Relativity.

My example is different.

Carbon nano-tubes however have a structure strong enough to take pull on each ends pulling it taunt (not at that length ofc but as an example for shorter lengths we will act as if it wont break).

So a laser beam is sent over a year to the target.

Meanwhile I order the weight on my end pulled. The other end gets moved enough to send a signal over the distance instantly.

Now reduce the distance/length involved wad the same still applies.... If light @ C cannot travel farther than the tube can transmit to then in the same time then Relativity is defeated.

Discounting my abilities is lame btw CC.

He made his argument then i posted a link supporting my claim with all known properties of the material on question.

>>Meanwhile I order the weight on my end pulled. The other end gets moved enough to send a signal over the distance instantly.<<

Where's your citation that such a tube transfers the kinetic energy faster than C? Instantly? Really? That's some special tube.

I don't think relativity is really supported by the fact that a long pipe can bend a bit. Doesn't really have anything to do with it.

You said it hadnt been demonstrated. Meaning nobody has actually made a length of nanotube, and sent a signal down the length, faster than a parallel laser. 

I don't see how you can prove the untested physical properties of a material. If and when somebody can beat fiberoptic cable with nanotubes it would be the biggest shitstorm since focault proved the earth wobbles.  Maybe it could happen.   maybe fusion can occur without a fission reaction.  until it happens it ain't happened.

Go out to a few dozen websites where relativity is discussed and people try to debunk it before you schools me Kemp.

Long distance communication and things preventing ftl communication are considered enmass.

The very idea of a pole between solar systems has been used and debated extensively.

not at all, althought you could not choose your target system because it would have to be free of the orbital plane of the system.  Can't have jupiter smash your interstellar bypass...

but the thing is, that even if the nanotube was just 1 atom thick, the stars are so far apart, a string of atoms between both suns would probably have more mass than the two stars.  even if it was just close to the mass of either star it would start pulling them in towards each other.  ordinary planets wouldn't have a chance to survive.  it's just a ultimate...doomsday...machine... O.O /drools

Chris_Balsz has discovered the ultimate doomsday machine. All you need to doom mankind is.... more matter than a star! Good luck acquiring that. And once you do, it's a bitch to move!

If it wouldn't move, it would have to be built to some precise timing and be useful for mere moments!

I want my doomsday machine to be useful over a period of time. In a few billion years some asshole like man might evolve again and have to be killed to prevent him from destroying the world by breathing out.

Had something similar to this in school

teacher was talking about quantumphysics and showed us a vid of how 2 paired electrons, even if they are at each other's opposite sides of the universe, would still both react at the exact same time when one of the electrons was stimulated. Was something about space not being the way we perceive it through our eyes/brains.

Didn't really understand it though so my explanation probably is really vague .

oh zarquon, that sounds just like A E Van Vogt's Distorter, with its instantaneous galactic teleportation of "synchronized" energies X(