Re: I am not a spammer!

A whole lot of witing which could have gone to the politics forum.

My accussation wins.

Henceforth, until you reply in that thread you started, you are ignored.

Not as someone seeking to attack me, though your elitist attacks are noted, not as someone who made me almost jump of a bridge.


No this one is simple.


Your beneath my notice. Your a nothing, and I do not need to speak to a nothing.

Goodbye and good riddance.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: I am not a spammer!

I think you mean "you're"

I also think it is a bit retarded to publicly declare that you ignore everyone who disagrees with you and then complain about a lack of debate.

The thread in politics died not because WFS didn't post again but because nobody discussed the topic with any regard for logic or any serious critical analysis of the article up for discussion. It was all just spouting unsubstantiated nonsense which had little or no relation to the article. Some people (or groups of people) in politics seem to believe that if you shout loud enough, post often enough and incessantly repeat the same meaningless posts long enough they will win the argument (which they define as their "opponents" leaving the thread).

-What actually happens is that free thinking rational people stop posting because they are at best bored and at worst infuriated by the apparently unavoidable barrage of nonsensical tripe posted in answer to logical posts pointing out inaccuracies or inconsistencies.

tweehonderd graden, dat is waarom ze me mr. fahrenheit noemen, ik reis aan de snelheid van het licht, ik ga een supersonische man van u maken

Re: I am not a spammer!

"A whole lot of witing which could have gone to the politics forum."

I did not start the discussion. I was provoked. I felt the need to defend myself here, unlike the post I made in politics.

"Not as someone seeking to attack me, though your elitist attacks are noted, not as someone who made me almost jump of a bridge."

What you're saying is that I don't attack you, but I do? Surely this is only possible on a sub-atomic level tongue
There's a difference in feeling offended in what I say and me insulting you.
Also, I think I don't have to defend myself for being arrogant and agressive. These last posts clearly show that you hold a grudge against me, rather than me against you. You're the one whe felt the need to insult, dismiss my arguments a priori and probably soon asks for my removal from the fmod team. I could have asked for a forum ban for openly insulting me and trolling, however I haven't. Call me elitist, but I do think I hold the moral higher ground here.

"Your beneath my notice. Your a nothing, and I do not need to speak to a nothing."

Add me to the list in your signature then. For me it merely means, like SD pointed out, that you just can't deal with different ideas.

And thanks SD!

God: Behold ye angels, I have created the ass.. Throughout the ages to come men and women shall grab hold of these and shout my name...

29 (edited by Justinian I 30-May-2010 19:11:19)

Re: I am not a spammer!

Use your intelligence to gain power for yourself. Stop thinking about your problems. Doing that is only going to depress your mental faculties, and you will glance over opportunities to benefit yourself. Seriously, live for yourself and think about the solution.

And WFS is not an elitist. He does not want to deal with closed-minded people who are unwilling to listen to reason. I disagree with him, of course, but it's mostly a difference of values. I am evil, I only care about myself. You should try it some day.

Re: I am not a spammer!

i am "close-minded" about definitions and that isolates me from a lot of the New Left and the New Right because they play games with definitions.

Like "recession"  which used to be "consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth" but now means who know what? The Bush Recession started in a quarter of positive growth and ended in a quarter with negative growth, if it did end.

so when "wealth distribution" is "proved" by indexing "trust in government" and "social mobility" then it is like telling me down is up.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: I am not a spammer!

Sitting duck that entire argument was destroyed.

Justinian I know not why you defend him, honestly. Did he pay you $$?

His entire post was essentially about a social scientist saying 'equalization makes everything better' and left so many holes as to make swiss cheese look like it's mapped down to the atom with no holes.

It was a horrid example of plain idiocy.

As for the your/you're example, meh. I care not. It's one of five words I am working on, have had issues with, and I am slowly beating. Since I have no speeeeel check on the phone it means errors get through.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: I am not a spammer!

commander christ?

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: I am not a spammer!

I think it must be some slur against Christians or such. Meh, his soul is lost as clearly as can be.

Imagine if I were to make a topic, declare victory, and never return to the topic, but make references to it. He thinks he is so superior, lol.

He's the kind of guy I would take in a back alley to show him the world ain't how he thinks it is, and that the police really won't save him if I had worse intent for him.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: I am not a spammer!

why get so pissed?

and I think you have dropped bombs in threads and then walked away

Its American socialists I get mad at, because they are in my pocket

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: I am not a spammer!

You shouldn't need a spell check to get it done, not when you call someone else an idiot. It makes you look silly when you claim your opponent is stupid while that opponent succeeds where you fail: comprehending the basic knowledge and structures of your native language.
You're a practicing christian right? Reread the part of the splinter/sawdust in the eye. It should be somewhere in Matthew according to the net. wink

Flint. Your post is irrelevant to the very essence of my point. As I said numberous times before: it was someone subscribing the idea of wealth distribution and he did it with a scientific study. The completeness of the study doesn't matter, at least it didn't for what I wanted to accomplish with posting it. And that was showing there was a scientific study about it.
And stop the bullshit about debating. You don't debate flint, you just ignore people and shout loud enough. That's exactly what you just did with the piece you typed for SD.

I must ask you to stop insulting me and my intelligence. It's getting on my nerves and I've been far too polite by tolerating it this long. It's also uncalled for and untrue (as other people in this thread said).

God: Behold ye angels, I have created the ass.. Throughout the ages to come men and women shall grab hold of these and shout my name...

Re: I am not a spammer!

Quit it with the personal insults guys. If you want to debate an issue go to politics, if you're just going to keep flaming each other we'll just close the thread

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Re: I am not a spammer!

i'd return to the topic but I dont think we have one anymore

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: I am not a spammer!

too bad you quit on politics WFS, we're debating whether circumcision is politically cheating the state of a duty to hygiene

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: I am not a spammer!

So let me see.


QUOTE
...I said numberous times before: it was someone subscribing the idea of wealth distribution and he did it with a scientific study. The completeness of the study doesn't matter...
/QUOTE

Oh so completeness does not matter?

You slay yourself with your own words.


Completeness does not matter.



Here's a study. Sugar and salt are tasty when added to food.



Here's a study, you post a topic that got laughed at.


Here's a study, liberalism fails.



Since I do not need, under your new rules, to prove this, then we have a situation when science is destroyed for a he said she said of a situation.

Oh the study was incomplete, left holes out, and I was not there to defend it? Not a problem since it is now an absolute.


I call thee lying liberal. Hypocrite, and a man of poor taste. This I have substantiated. If you doubt it, too bad, I made a written study here and now it's a fact forever.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: I am not a spammer!

Flint and humour, the relationship that never worked..
As I said before, the point was that a professor made a scientific study about it. The term scientific implies it has some sort of intristic value to it. My statement about its completeness was just to (jokingly) appease you and Chris, cause you already judged it to be false..

The rest of your post is your usual sensless selfrighteous newspeak. I won't go into detail to counter it, apart for the poor taste. I think there's hardly anyone here on this forum who knows more about the arts than me. You can not call me a man of poor taste..
Oh, and liberal. I'm everything but a liberal. Your anglo-american definitions don't apply to a political system with more democratic factions. I hope America will one day have more than two large parties. It'd clear some of its citizens (like yourself) of its senseless and directless Manichaeistic duality.

God: Behold ye angels, I have created the ass.. Throughout the ages to come men and women shall grab hold of these and shout my name...

Re: I am not a spammer!

> East wrote:

> thread jackers! thread jackers!


Your thread is gone, you're a wreck....

☑ Saddam Hussein ☑ Osama Bin Laden ☐ Justin Bieber

Re: I am not a spammer!

hahahaha

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: I am not a spammer!

tears on my pillow, won't bring it back sad

qsudifhkqsdhfmsklfhjqmlsdfhjqkmsldfhjmqklsfhmqlsfhjqmsklfhqmskjdfhqsfq
sdffdgjfhjdfhgjhsfsdfqgsbsthzgflqkcgjhkgfjnbkmzghkmqrghqmskdghqkmsghnvhdf
qmkjghqmksdjqlskhqkmsdhqmskfhjqmskjdfhqkmsdfjhqmskfhjqkmsjdfhqkm
sjfhqkmsjfhqkmsjfhkqmjsfhqksdjmfhqksjfhqskjdfhnbwfjgqreutyhaerithgfqsd
kjnqsdfqsdfqsdfmkjqhgmkjnqsgkjmhzdflmghjsmdlghjsmdkghmqksdjghq

Re: I am not a spammer!

There was hardly any topic in the first place.
It wasn't spam though..

God: Behold ye angels, I have created the ass.. Throughout the ages to come men and women shall grab hold of these and shout my name...

Re: I am not a spammer!

wooohooo +1+1+1!!!

qsudifhkqsdhfmsklfhjqmlsdfhjqkmsldfhjmqklsfhmqlsfhjqmsklfhqmskjdfhqsfq
sdffdgjfhjdfhgjhsfsdfqgsbsthzgflqkcgjhkgfjnbkmzghkmqrghqmskdghqkmsghnvhdf
qmkjghqmksdjqlskhqkmsdhqmskfhjqmskjdfhqkmsdfjhqmskfhjqkmsjdfhqkm
sjfhqkmsjfhqkmsjfhkqmjsfhqksdjmfhqksjfhqskjdfhnbwfjgqreutyhaerithgfqsd
kjnqsdfqsdfqsdfmkjqhgmkjnqsgkjmhzdflmghjsmdlghjsmdkghmqksdjghq

Re: I am not a spammer!

but THIS is

http://www.hulu.com/watch/4303/saturday-night-live-grumpy-old-man

also not funneh.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: I am not a spammer!

we can't watch dat sad

qsudifhkqsdhfmsklfhjqmlsdfhjqkmsldfhjmqklsfhmqlsfhjqmsklfhqmskjdfhqsfq
sdffdgjfhjdfhgjhsfsdfqgsbsthzgflqkcgjhkgfjnbkmzghkmqrghqmskdghqkmsghnvhdf
qmkjghqmksdjqlskhqkmsdhqmskfhjqmskjdfhqkmsdfjhqmskfhjqkmsjdfhqkm
sjfhqkmsjfhqkmsjfhkqmjsfhqksdjmfhqksjfhqskjdfhnbwfjgqreutyhaerithgfqsd
kjnqsdfqsdfqsdfmkjqhgmkjnqsgkjmhzdflmghjsmdlghjsmdkghmqksdjghq

Re: I am not a spammer!

oh wondered about copy right

it's Dana Carvey's grumpy old  man

"I'm OLD! And I like things the way they were, compared to the way they are now! Bah!  Everything's improved and I HATE it!"

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

49 (edited by East 19-Aug-2010 17:14:26)

Re: I am not a spammer!

"You have been banned for the following reason:
Point Accumulation"

hmm I can't even see what finally tipped them over the edge, this is not due process I should get the right to find out what part of my obnoxiousness is too obnoxiouss sad

qsudifhkqsdhfmsklfhjqmlsdfhjqkmsldfhjmqklsfhmqlsfhjqmsklfhqmskjdfhqsfq
sdffdgjfhjdfhgjhsfsdfqgsbsthzgflqkcgjhkgfjnbkmzghkmqrghqmskdghqkmsghnvhdf
qmkjghqmksdjqlskhqkmsdhqmskfhjqmskjdfhqkmsdfjhqmskfhjqkmsjdfhqkm
sjfhqkmsjfhqkmsjfhkqmjsfhqksdjmfhqksjfhqskjdfhnbwfjgqreutyhaerithgfqsd
kjnqsdfqsdfqsdfmkjqhgmkjnqsgkjmhzdflmghjsmdlghjsmdkghmqksdjghq

50 (edited by avogadro 19-Aug-2010 20:30:06)

Re: I am not a spammer!

its fun messing with mods: only other forum i've had trouble with their moderation other then IC

Sappho: Dear Atavax,

You have received a warning at The Secret World Official Forums.

Reason:
-------
Continued open disussion of moderation

Discussion on moderation in open forums is not acceptable. This has been pointed out many times in many threads.
-------



Atavax: what moderation have i discussed? i havent discussed any moderation at all... in the What is ek1ESnhjREo1UWpNa1lqTg ?; you have not done any moderation, so my posts have not been about moderation but about the content of the thread.


Sappho: I made a request in the thread. That is moderation. You questioned that request, I responded. You questioned that response. I suggested that if you had a problem, to report it. You responded in the thread again, despite my request otherwise.

You seem to take great offence to any decision/request, made by me, that goes against your opinion/world-view. That's fine, just don't air it in the forums; keep it yourself.



Atavax: everyone constantly makes requests on the forum, and people always comment on theirs, so its safe to assume talking about someone's request isnt banned.

if whatever comments you made is considered moderation because you are a moderator, then there are threads and posts constantly breaking that you have appeared to have supported, by making silly posts in those threads...

from my months on the boards i have only seen encouragment from you in people responding to your posts as long as they werent responses to your actions as moderator... i followed this format...



Sappho: The infraction is solely in response to my last request for you to report a post if you had a problem with it. Your decision was to ignore that request, and openly reply in the thread.



Atavax: i didnt have a problem with any posts... providing a differing opinion is not having a problem with it. Adults can have differing opinions and be ok with it. i would think a moderator of all people would know that.


Sappho: One more comment like that will find you on an extended posting holiday.... very extended.

This entire conversation is at an end and will be posted on internal forums, and to FC, for peer review.


Atavax: could you please post a link to a single place in the forums that points out that discussing moderation in open forums is not acceptable?



Sappho: Forum rules:
Moderation is not ever a topic for open forum. If you have any questions or feedback on moderation it should be addressed to the community manager or the specific moderator via private message.
Anything else you need help finding?


Atavax:
how is me clarifying that i was not trying to moderate moderators creating the topic of moderation? the topic was me and my actions, not the actions of a moderator... if anyone started a topic about moderation in the open forums, i think it would be the one accusing someone of assuming the role of moderator of moderators? i did not have any questions or feedback on moderation to be addressed by a community manager or specific moderator, i was defending myself from a public attack on the forums...

further more, the topic of moderation and any discussion of moderation are completely different. underneath the part you quoted, theres an elaboration, just like every other part of the forum rules, which clearly leaves out anything that i could of been interpretted as doing
" * Do not post threads questioning moderation. Such threads will be removed
* If a topic is closed or removed do not, under any circumstances, re-post the same topic or material. If you have any questions as to wh



Sappho: Stepping back to the original event that sparked this whole debate, you had no involvement (other than probably reading) in the thread until after I had posted my request.

Your questioning of my moderation request, in public, in the thread is what leads us here now. That you see it as an attack is nothing more than grandstanding.

You obviously have an issue with moderators making simple requests on these forums, that you don't necessarily agree with, and that's fine. Just don't bring it up in public. PM someone or report it for consideration. The other alternative, should you find those options too much of a chore, is to find somewhere else that is more in line with the way you like to operate.




Atavax:me calling it an attack is stating the obvious. you did not say i was trying to be moderator of the moderators as a compliment, it was an attempt to discredit me, saying it was overstepping my bounds. please don't try to deny it, you're only insulting my intelligence by doing so.

I have no problem with moderators making simple requests. i even have no problem with moderators banning any comments about moderation. the only issue i have is being punished while following the rules and the practice of the rules to the letter.

there countless examples of others talking about your moderation with apparently no ill effect, it appears you took my opinion personally and that i am a victim of the unprofessional nature in which you carry out your moderation of the boards. there are no rules that you can compliment moderation but cant insult it, but when was the last time someone got a warning for complimenting your moderation? complimenting moderation is just as against the rules as insulting it is.

i didnt even insult you, i stated a system of values contrary to your own, and thats how this situation happened; you intolerance to another person's system of values contrary to your own. i didnt voice disapproval, i only stated a different point of view and i got accused of trying to moderate moderators and an official warning for denying that i was trying to moderate you by pointing out another view.

you also never responded to the elaboration of the moderation on the rules. the forum rules had a summary of each rule and then they explained it in detail underneath for every rule.
for example:
Signature

Your signature is a good place for including some info about yourself, a quote you like, or links to your characters. The signature should not take the attention away from the posts though, and thus we have these rules for signatures:

* Limit it to a maximum of 10 lines, including any empty lines.
* Use normal text size or smaller. I.e. no [size=x] tags with x > 2.
* Don't overdo the colors and smileys.
* Avoid the

tag, as it takes up a lot of space.


and for the moderation rule the explanation in detail was * Do not post threads questioning moderation. Such threads will be removed
* If a topic is closed or removed do not, under any circumstances, re-post the same topic or material. If you have any questions as to why a thread was closed or removed please contact the moderator via private message.



Sappho: Dear Atavax,

You have received a warning at The Secret World Official Forums.

Reason:
-------
Flaming

The following text is the reason...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atavax
there countless examples of others talking about your moderation with apparently no ill effect, it appears you took my opinion personally and that i am a victim of the unprofessional nature in which you carry out your moderation of the boards. there are no rules that you can compliment moderation but cant insult it, but when was the last time someone got a warning for complimenting your moderation? complimenting moderation is just as against the rules as insulting it is.



Atavax: ok, you warned me again, now can you please address the points?


Sappho: Any further issues you have, please feel free to PM Tarib.

I have finished trying to explain things to you, maybe Tarib will be able to find some time to assist you further.


Atavax: you havent made a single attempt, you havent answered a single question i've asked since the beginning....


Sappho: Let me make my statement clearer. Do NOT continue to PM me any further on this subject. Direct all further PM's to Tarib if you wish. If you continue to PM me on this subject, I will issue a further infraction which includes an account lockout.


My discussion with Tarib will have to wait until another time tongue

Posts: 26 to 50 of 51

Pages Previous 1 2 3 Next

You must login or register to post a reply

Imperial Forum → General → I am not a spammer!