Tl Dr

Yes, Flint. What a horrible smash that was!

Theobviouspoliticaltrollcommentsonothers?

Nobody likes you east

I don't feel morally obliged to defend what I said in that thread Chris. I can't bring up the effort to try to close another gap that some people create by dismissing any other angle to look at things a priori.
I thought it was a nice thing a sociology professor proved my social and economic ideas. And that was what I wanted to say.
It was more than Flint ever accomplished; his closest case was his compression algorithm that's supposedly backed by "two math scientists". Yet that man uses every obligation to call me ignorant and stupid (oh sweet irony!).

Undeath = sexy

So he says proved, his theories, but he cannot be arsed to defend them against real world criticism?

We so ripped those pathetic theories apart though, disproving them utterly and showing that he is []... oh that's why he won't return to that thread!

if you're impressed by moral arguments proved by the evaluation of inquantifiables, I have some medieval tracts on the necessity of Catholicism for you

catholics stopped the barbarians!

Because you are brain damaged and cannot defend your arguments wfs?

"Because you are brain damaged and cannot defend your arguments wfs?"

Rather the opposite, Flint. Sometimes I feel like I'm explaining quantumphysics to toddlers (How does one explain modern leftism when other people can not leave their old assumptions about it behind?). Unlike you Flint, I never had to make claims about my intelligence to get a point across. You take your republicanism as a religion and consider everything that doesn't fit it as unintelligent and even an abomination. It's not much different from "Extra Ecclesiam nullas salus".

It's remarkable how you made different claims to support different ideas. We had "I'm a security expert", "I'm a math scientist" (oh the play on words we could do here!), "I'm a politician", and now we have "I'm a truck driver".
We have a saying for that and that's: twelve jobs and thirteen accidents. We don't know the exact circumstances of those jobchanges, but it does not make you look as the intelligent bloke you claim you are, but as a failure who can't keep a job. The social appreciation of these jobs is not really improving either (wich, I'd like to stress, doesn't say anything at all). Make your claims and call me dumb all you want, Flint. If you don't take yourself serious anymore, who will?

And thanks Justinian!

Btw if you do not understand, the depressed, manic, paranoid, pessimist, loser you knew in 2000 to 2005 is gone. Even the coming out of depression from 2005 to 2008 guy is gone.

I know I am better, I have my confidence, and I can defend what I write, and with skill, eloquence and wit.

You on the other hand post how you got validated by some mad social scientist with half a brain and .0001% of a clue between the two of you.

My son is gone, I will never see him. Accepted. Moving on with my life means I start again, choose a career I can get $$ from, and push ahead hard.

I made $40k last year. During that time I paid off child support owed until she fled to Canada (had been in arrears), State Taxes, State fees and fines, two credit collection agencies, and bought up a lot of things as I thought I could. My first year in trucking, with me taking it easy so I could still enjoy life, and I made a decent penny.

That's a recovery. Mock it, go ahead. Show how intellectual you are by avoiding debate and by attacking a man who recovered from suicidal level depressions.

Go away from politics, you're an embarrassment.