Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

and ur the only one who really doesnt know me static, so stfu

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

An, gee guys, it aint vulturing if the planet/system was in contention BEFORE war was declared. Ya cant defend yourself from retakes by just declarin war, or bein declared on. You still have to deal with the results of your past acts.

75% of all players in IC have hemorroids,

the other 25% are perfect assholes.

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

"663 wouldn't ever win against 638 if they fought 1vs1"

haha i absolutely love when people talk out of their ass. We warred their family last round and were winning til they had their top 5 rank ally who had countless shares with us join up so i wouldnt be talking whoever the hell you are..no-name idiot go crawl under a rock

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

i agree with hummy if your at war and pinging systems before the war it does not grant you the option to cf those systems and portal them when if u were in the war u wouldnt get them portaled.. low move to use to get portals up by alot of fams. dont think fams involved in this thread are doing so. but 659 tried that with my fam. pinging about 5 systems for a week and we were at war with their allies turned into us vulture'n systems off them lol. 4 ticks from our hs 20+ from theirs....

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

> BIG GARY wrote:

> "663 wouldn't ever win against 638 if they fought 1vs1"

> haha i absolutely love when people talk out of their ass. We warred their family last round and were winning til they had their top 5 rank ally who had countless shares with us join up so i wouldnt be talking whoever the hell you are..no-name idiot go crawl under a rock


ok and you had your ally jump ops and up us and 2v1 us for a solid 3 days before our allies even canceled the nap, which had loopholes in it and any other alliance would have voided it and jumped your ass, but since we arnt nap breakers they cancel, so you had us a solid 4 days in a 2v1 and couldnt kill us? Not to mention the fact that we didnt break the nap... like your allies did just now...

keep trying to make us look like the bad guys, it always gives me a good laugh...

X(

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

"which had loopholes in it and any other alliance would have voided it and jumped your ass, "

hahahaha re-read what you just wrote, and re-read what your complaining about in this thread!!

"so you had us a solid 4 days in a 2v1 and couldnt kill us?"

hahahahahaha even more! we easily had the upper hand and your family was falling hard. We were up what was it, 10 systems at one point, which your family was fully portalled in previously, and we had no shares and did that:)

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

you were what, 50 planets up ?   tongue

anyway, that was last round lets move on!

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

it was more than 50 planets:-p

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

why don't u guys stop talking and do something about it???

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

we are and 38 is crying about it, or did u fail to read the initial post dumbass?

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

lol.. you tell em gary wink

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

i still love everybody, especially since its 4-20 =x, especially you nai!

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

so...

even though 642 broke a nap...and saved for a week...

they are losing this war???


HOW?!? They leave their fleets out and go to sleep and then go to work before logging back into IC?

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

were not loosing jack shit O_o?

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

@Tmk

they managed to lose 2,7 mil nw fleet in 1 tick tongue

maybe someone should tell them how to statione fighters and that you clean attackers first bevor hitting bankers...

Tobi

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

ya ya ya, my internet shitted out after you saw an attack in ur news, 30 seconds, 6 attacks, good game -_-

will never ever ever ever happen again

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

92 (edited by =( sKoE )= 22-Apr-2008 05:22:15)

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

tongue yeah its always the internet.. or the phone... or in your caese both...

Week 9, 16

ahhh =p u caught me getting my [] phone, congrats

Signed, Emi of Eminence (642)

tongue

probatly your leader called you since he had his 500k out too... big_smile

anyway i shouldn't have shared with you anymore... you had 10 ticks to clean me...

Tobi

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

wink not enough moral to completely clean all those portals, people in my family didnt do as i asked, it was great stuff actually, im very very pleased -_-

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

Well, clearing me first was your first big mistake.  Not only am I NOT an HC attacker, but I really didnt have figs or much of a fleet, so you were better off to hit other people.  But hey, who am I to tell you how to play? smile

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

hehe....go 638!!

642...i kinda saw sol's infiltrate...it was hilarious=P

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

once again emi proved a lieng and deceiving player that cares about... only himself...

X(

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

right static, again ur comments are stupid

im fine with taking the blame for this FINE WITH IT wink

and as much you want me to feel dishonorable so you can have that satisfaction of me actually being fustrated over this game, well its not gonna happen wink some people dont base their lives and character off a wargame called ImperialConflict

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

What? says who? *snickers*

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

Who said that I wanted to make you feel dishonorable, no need to... you already are dishonorable and everyone knows it youve admitted it a few times, your a jackass that steps on everyone else in the world to get what you want... if thats how you like to live then so be it... karmas a bitch...

X(

100 (edited by =( sKoE )= 22-Apr-2008 05:23:31)

Re: 642 breakes nap on 638..

yes, karma is a [paddlepop lion]

lmfao

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!