Topic: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

Platform 9 and 3/4 (638) has declared war on us.

lol, pathetic really.

Rank 2 against rank 15, what a challenge

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

Well, it's a pale imitation of the true champions of this round - #1 (663) versus #28 (657).
But it's charming to know the families at the top continue to wear it with such class.

Tryp

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

Wow, didn't know that. Then this was nothing, almost a fair fight compared to that one wink

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

Yeah, lol, I'm sure you must feel greatly encouraged by that news, rofl
What are you gonna do?  The rules don't prevent it, they actually encourage this sort of a thing.

Tryp

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

yes, sadly top fams always lack the courage to do a real fight

I do not suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

As I said, we will try to stay out of NW range and just sit this one out...

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

TheAsylum

I pay compo...

however nap stated clearly it is a 48hr nap and it was cancelled at 17,14 - so war start would be 13,15....

if you and gen make some nap contradicting agreements about war start, I am sorry... I just was going strictly after the nap and wasnt aware you and gen agreed on war start 1 tick afterwards... to me it was just a calculation mistake from genesis, I had no idea you guys agreed upon that time...

anyway, your top attacker wasnt even online at war start and until now he is still not online... so the result would have been pretty much the same I guess...

however I pay compo, dont worry...

Cheat Sheet = Grindelwald = Whitebeard = Lunarstar = Natale = Valkiria

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

Indeed, there was a mistake because of Summertime.

Attacks were supposed to have started at 20:00 GMT, but because of the mistake with GMT Lunarstar made some attacks at 19:00 GMT.

Only he attacked and took some planets, which will be returned and compensation will be paid.

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

No, it doesn't change the outcome but that has really nothing to do with it.

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

Ha. Serves you right for trying to farm us smile

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

erm, you knew it was going to happen.  Our HS's are very close.  Back in the day, rank vs rank 15 was all right, but the nw diparity this round is enormous, so this look 1 sided.


In our defense, we have not jumped any fleet, nor did we have much to begin with.  Our leader (although I wont speak for him), probably wants to just gain more core systems.  We didnt jump anything, so idk why everyone is whining neutral you guys had two 1 mil nw people, and our attackers are also 1mil.  This is a fair fight, no aid is being given to this war so please no whining smile

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

I haven't whined, I just said it was pathetic, no challange, no fun...

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

I don't get why fams will ask fams for naps, especially when a fam like ours who is so hyped about our players... why nap us early all it will end up being is a farm of your fam...

bad leadership by 41, sorry to you asylum, but i was ranked 23rd a few rounds ago and destroyed the #6 fam... play smart and dont just nap for the "right now" look in the future...

not pathetic, just a game...

X(

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

And now #667 has started to vulture as well...

@Static, I'm old school, I play with honour. NAP or no NAP, I wouldn

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

667 attacked me as well...hit a portalled planet while my fleets were on the move...

Re: 638 vs 641 (not a joke)

Hi Asylum, glad to see some old school are still arround !

Times have changed alot since we played together huh! ( back then I played as The fighting Ducks, if i'm not mistaken we were in same fam with MILF, Simple, etc )

anyway
good luck.

ps, join andro, who knows we might random in same fam smile

Planet fatness is an ART !