• Posts: 618

Topic: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

We have DECLARED WAR on family Dont Panic (1759). Dont Panic (1759) has DECLARED WAR on us.

were at war with 59 and 43 are vulturing.

were ranked like 28th or something.. versus 2 fams ranked 15th and 16th.

its reasons like this that IC numbers are dwindling. hardly anyone has the skill nor the balls to actually aim for and take on a family even of the same size let alone more. emohotpocket (killingworth) is one exception i know of. there may be others but theres none from 59 or 43.

grow a pair and fight some family of the same size. you shouldnt have any trouble if you are fighting as an alliance..

but farming us only proves that your scared of the other families. maybe now theyll see that youre actually vulnerable

--------------------------
Real men smoke tyres
--------------------------
Caution: Slippery when dry

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

what?

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 618

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

its there in simple terms .. im not melvin

--------------------------
Real men smoke tyres
--------------------------
Caution: Slippery when dry

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

43/59 have had their share of bashings by the bigger fams, what do u want them to do??

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 618

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

i understand that, but a 2v1 of a family half of the size of just one of them, isnt a good thing is it?

--------------------------
Real men smoke tyres
--------------------------
Caution: Slippery when dry

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

6 Reply by (edited by Trundar 15-Apr-2009 08:50:36)

  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 796
  • Tag points: 13

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

2 things to say, and 1 to ask.

I'm assuming that they declared on you first? Hard to be sure because relations page lists other fams toward you... and then your fam toward them... so the start of your post seems backwards, or a representation on time.

As you probably know 43 is their ally so they would probably join no matter where you sat.

Numbers dwindling has nothing to do with this... Numbers dwindled which CAUSED all of this. The experienced players leaving and new ones coming in (obviously at a slower rate). Back in the old days, even if fams got behind they typically wouldn't be all TOO far behind and there was a lot more competition between spots and a lot more wars. Now there are mostly inexperienced players trying to avoid fighting and falling behind, while the few good ones make the power fams that have no choice but to swarm. This has caused a lot larger gap between the ranks and the overall NW spread of the galaxy making it hard to find targets your own size.

I will agree that it's a bit extensive, but lyv is right... 59 was hit hard earlier and is trying to recoup its losses as they are probably a lot weaker in either fighting power or infra than the fams that are close in NW. I wouldn't be surprised if 59 wasn't 'technically' your same power of a fam... just with a lot more seeming threat from rank after their beating.


This is a bit overkill I will admit, but it's likely 43 is just going to snag a few and not join the main mass of the war. Don't you have allies to call?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

??why is my name inculde into something i dont know.you want me to war block you??

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

smoke you want me to war you.i can declare coz suddenly i have been promoted to be a leader.like ppl say the more the merrier big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

Military Advisor
"Attacking this planet will cost us 3007, and it will take our units approximately 3 weeks to arrive. Remember that for every 100 infantry we need 1 transport."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 618

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

the reason why i said your name melvin was because its a well known fact that you sometimes have difficulty speaking ENGLISH

if you could read properly and understand what i said then you would not care and youd just leave it be.

--------------------------
Real men smoke tyres
--------------------------
Caution: Slippery when dry

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,088
  • Tag points: 187

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

.......smoke this thread wasnt even neccesary  "were at war with 59 and 43 are vulturing."

BULLSHYTE!! vulturing link me anything where 59 has blown up planets or anything and 43 has taken them.....everyone knows 43 is also innactive and its me helping my allies..... i cant belive you would stoop to this level and say we as in "I" was vulturing...or am....i do my own thing and i help "my" Allies cause you know you help allies out thats what they are for.... pffft vulturing...

u have to be joking...

underline is basically fam 1759 and me Vs. you guys...... and u acuse me of vulturing haha low....

we have had our fair share of rapings..no doubt about it....i mean with all that thing with tymo..i had to explo all the nap planets by my self..it is sort of a reflection on our activity......and you accuse me of vulturing..... so basically 1.1 vs. 1

smoke..... low man sad

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 618

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

so your saying you are completely SS?

just because its one person attacking doesnt mean its not a family funded effort

--------------------------
Real men smoke tyres
--------------------------
Caution: Slippery when dry

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,088
  • Tag points: 187

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

no not really SS is when i self suffice my self obviously i need help from my bankers to keep from my fleet disbanding....its up to me who i attack and when was it looked down upon helping allies anyway and to be called vulturing is no small thing smoke just blew it out of proportion imho..

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

Not to be an ass or anything. But Smoke this thread was kinda stupid lol

If you're in the game and you have planets, they are free to take them. If your fam is not top 10, then you fail. And in a week or so, nobody will even care about this outside of the people involved. I'm posting here and I only 1% care about it. The best thing for you to do is to go play gameboy or something. I'm not even playing and I can tell you probably had it coming =p

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

YA MY VOTE GO TO SMOKE (was in his fam last round)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

plus, what's the point of this anyway? Couldn't you have sent them this msg ingame? lol

Nobody cares about your family being 2vs1'd. Go get your allies and fight back!

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

it mean ur english is better i know.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 618

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

i spoke with them about it lol metrex is on my MSN from previous rounds lol we are actually friends

i enjoy hearing peoples ideas and having everything out in the open

--------------------------
Real men smoke tyres
--------------------------
Caution: Slippery when dry

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 618

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

melvin i think your english is getting better.. but still needs work tongue

--------------------------
Real men smoke tyres
--------------------------
Caution: Slippery when dry

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,088
  • Tag points: 187

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

lol yea no hard feelings but accusing ME of vulturing lol

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

to show my support i declare war on We have DECLARED WAR on family Dont Panic (1759) .see i warblock you tongue.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

??i was giving him a helping hand?did i do something wrong??

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,088
  • Tag points: 187

Re: big fams ganging up on small fams 59+43 vs 39??

rizzy stfu smile:):)

<3

"Heh heh heh heh heh heh!"

Metrex

0 Dislike 0 Post Points