Re: Women Soldiers
> Elysian Thebes wrote:
> fokker, you're not getting it. just because they're in the military doesn't mean they know jack about what BW is talking about. Navy coremen have more combat experience than a huge slice of the marine corps.
if you look into the whole pog/grunt thing, you'd understand what BW is talking about. yeah, my friend was a marine, but he spent 4 years behind a desk running papers and coffee for officers. he has a better understanding of things than the average civvie, but compared to an infantryman, all he has is 2 weeks of "roughing it" after he got out of boot camp.
like i said, from those in the know, /laugh, cry
and btw, the marine corps does use females in certain infantry-tasked roles, like searching females in homes/checkpoints since in the middle east, its way more acceptable than men doing it.<
And what of the two soldiers? Both of whom are serving in Iraq. (Ok, one is currently on leave) Both of whom say the same thing Ehawk says. Do they not get it too?
BW's view is based on when he was serving, WAS serving, past-tense. It was accurate then, I have no doubt, and have not questioned that.
My view is based on my obsessive questioning of my friends currently serving in the British military service. Currently. Present tense.