• SCK
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Topic: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

War beginning in a couple of ticks.

     Dogbert Outplacement Agency (1100)       654      3899632      41089

                                         vs.

     HELL (1088)       656      3001994      32316

WILD CARDS (1067)       1205      7507340      55251


War Briefing:

This is the situation. 1100 gave 1088 48 hour NAP cancellation notice and messaged them that we would be declaring war. Not too many shares, but given that 1100 is starting to rebuild, we figure'd it'd be a fair fight and give our attackers something to do. About 3 ticks ago, 1067 leader msgs me and informs me that they'd be dropping NAP in 48 hours with intentions of war. Puts us in a sticky situation as we do not have ally. So I msg 1067 that we are about to go to war so to kindly back off. They inform me that 1088 is their ally and so they will keep us from "farming" them. ROFL.

So, I then try to attempt some diplomacy and message 1088 that we will then reinstate NAP and go war their bigger ally.. even tho' it's not close to being fair. 1088 leader msgs me back and informs me that they can't back off now that their ally has committed.

So i call them shmucks <-- is that a bad word? or did i make it up? lol

and now, we are PO'd and decide to war both of them. Whether we lose or win we'll have to see.

Looks to be an unfair fight tongue but it always is!

So other fams please stay out.

HOWEVER, if your family is currently not allied and would like to offer us an alliance tongue then msg me ingame to work something out.

Both 1088 and 1067 are planet fat tongue so could mean loads of planets for you!

Best regards,

SCK

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • SCK
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

btw, they're claiming that it is still fair, cus we can hit 1088 for 48 hours before we have to fight 1067 tongue

i guess that's our advantage? rofl

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,240
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

well it is fair cos u guys attacked about 5hrs before the NAP was meant to end!

In peace we train for war, in war we fight for peace.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • SCK
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

err.. NAP ended week 39

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,240
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

week 44 dont ya mean

In peace we train for war, in war we fight for peace.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • SCK
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

mmm, okay, i looked it over, and it was supposed to end week 40. i'm sorry. we will make ammends once war is finished.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

7 Reply by Bodge (edited by Bodge 09-Sep-2008 04:50:37)

  • Posts: 312

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

Lol... convenient way to get ahead! tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,240
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

well thanks fat lot of gd that will do then i had portals coming in with shares with ur top banker that tic when u kicked me out early. and if u didnt kick me out then this war could be going a very very different way ryt now considering we had a fair few shares which u kicked us out all early!

In peace we train for war, in war we fight for peace.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Raif
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 895

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

same thing happens to me all the time too mr gree,  always get booted near enemy one tick b4 ports come in......yeah right

Hsin Shee Lahn - Raif - Winton Rufer - Superman - Winterfell - Once - Raif Heart Kill - Ted Bundy - Valiant - Blackhail - antEhelp

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 312

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

same thing always happens to me too mr green, get some muppet sticking his two cents in when its not needed or wanted....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,240
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

err yeah was true actually man i ave no reason and no need to lie thanks.

and if the NAP ended on wk 44 like it should of then the portals would of bin built for ages.
anyways all im saying is they ave attacked well before the the NAP was meant to end just to get the upper hand on us.
which i think u can agree would give ?

In peace we train for war, in war we fight for peace.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • SCK
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

uhh.. first of all NAP ended week 40.

Secondly, you haven't even jumped your fleet yet. I visioned you during week 40 and you had 2 million iron. I opped quite a bit of that tongue and then visioned u next tick and u had 1500. so we infil'd u.. and u probably JUST jumped fleet with the rest big_smile

so don't talk to me like you had anything. Even if u had those portals, we would've taken them just the same on week 40.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

First of all, i received the msg to end nap on week 45, you should not have attacked until week 41 of the next year to be exact tongue

And like i said in ingame msg, i was trying to get my allies to not get themselves involved. But you seem quite content to take us both on, so now im not going to hold them back smile

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

And in my fam, i never said the nap was ending 6 hours after it meant to, i was referring to the fact when we should start our attacks wink
Sorry for the confusion tongue

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

so many ppl at war why my fam not incudle inside

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

Lol, yeah, many wars tongue
And unessessary wars tongue

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,735

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

Ya dudes is funny.. 88 ftw wink lol

Just Do It &#8730;

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • SCK
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

big_smile

/me is noob tongue but hurrah for wars. lets have some fun

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

This war is sloooowww tongue

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

20 Reply by Skyroshroud (edited by Skyroshroud 10-Sep-2008 13:04:19)

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

Before the War
Dogbert Outplacement Agency (1100)       
654      3899632      41089

HELL (1088)       
656      3001994      32316

-----

Present time
Dogbert Outplacement Agency (1100) 
673 3947996 43606

HELL (1088) 
681 3728656 34743

-----

Lol planet count gain isnt exactly correct because both fams have still been exploring tongue

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,105
  • Tag points: 2265

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

Of course it wasn't going to be a big bloody war.. not many shares and long travel times.. we both are small families..not sure what you were expecting tongue

~~Lemming of leather and lollipops~~

Right, so what are we waiting for?  Can we get this going?  Any other feedback?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

Haha, not to sound whiney tongue
But it woulda been better for us if you hadnt started 2 ticks early wink
But thats it from me smile
Nobody likes a whiner, just wanted you to know my thoughts tongue
(and by better i mean better for us) hehe

lol and i was expecting to get hit as i am i main banker tongue

And which player are you KT? yikes

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

wow overuse of emoticons big_smile

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,105
  • Tag points: 2265

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

It was one tick and SCK messed up on the time.. but as he said you will be compensated smile

~~Lemming of leather and lollipops~~

Right, so what are we waiting for?  Can we get this going?  Any other feedback?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,235
  • Tag points: 338

Re: 1100 vs. 1088 and 1067

It was 2 ticks wink

Week 45, 12
Heya,

We've had a leadership change in our family. We will be ending the NAP between our two families. This is a 48 hour notice. Thanks.

SCK (1100)

Signed, SCK of DOA SCK (1100)

I received the NAP cancelation on week 45.
Going by that, the NAP should of ended on week 41 of the next year tongue


And where is you KT yikes i wont attack you wink

Your = possessive. As in, "your grammar sucks."
You're = you are. As in, "you're an idiot for not knowing the difference."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points