Some good feedback.
Yeah Random, I hear ya. I actually prefer more fams myself, but clearly others disagree. I think you're exactly correct about variety.
I do think smaller galaxies (as in, total players) are going to be the norm for awhile, regardless of fam count/size ratio. In the past we've made sure that the galaxies has enough spots to let everybody join but I think this, although well intentioned, is a mistake as it leads to imbalanced fams, emptier gals, etc.
Anyway, the interesting thing here is that the IA pushback was so loud that it seemed like it was the #1 thing that was "ruining the game" and needed changing. Hence why a galaxy that is otherwise the same seemed like the natural choice for the players who want solace from the IA change.
I think though, what's really happened, is that the people who spoke out so loudly against the IA changes have a valid but over-represented opinion. It seems now that a larger group of players are coming out to say that what they really want is more basic variety (HC being an obvious example) regardless of IA.
You guys are right: there's no use opening essentially a cloned galaxy, but I think there may be some disagreement about IAs impact on the situation.
I'll set up a poll in a bit to get some numbers.
Thanks everybody.
Got a few bucks? The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!