1 Topic by 0rion (edited by 0rion 11-Jan-2017 23:10:28)

  • Posts: 2,913
  • Tag points: 10

Topic: 3683 vs. 3681

NAP Cancellations
Our relations with *Cars* (3681) have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 45 weeks.

1        *Cars* (3681) [39,61]    884    15847195    83399

vs.

6        ~ THE U.S. MARINE CORPS ~ (3683) [22,42]    1092    7835937    84317

Let's dance.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

1 Tag Point

  • Posts: 282
  • Tag points: 12

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

/dances

But man is not made for defeat. A man can be destroyed but not defeated

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

finally another good war.. GL to both sides

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,791
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

good luck both sides
83 have the advantage  saved quite long and have way more savings so lets have a good war big_smile

Lazyness> we are fighting with knives against guys with machine guns

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 592
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

Well they have to double in size, so it'll be interesting

My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness

                          -2 Corinthians 12:9

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

6 Reply by 0rion (edited by 0rion 12-Jan-2017 20:05:09)

  • Posts: 2,913
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

@colo: You know I wanted to cancel for very long. We were not waiting until we had enough savings, but only wanted the core violations to be settled first. Due to a bug it didn't happen, so this levels things a bit more. Now you have shares which actually were core violations.

So... How about you deportal all those? Sounds like a deal? big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,791
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

0rion wrote:

@colo: You know I wanted to cancel for very long. We were not waiting until we had enough savings, but only wanted the core violations to be settled first. Due to a bug it didn't happen, so this levels things a bit more. Now you have shares which actually were core violations.

So... How about you deportal all those? Sounds like a deal? big_smile


even you guys got core violations

Lazyness> we are fighting with knives against guys with machine guns

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • LG
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5,713
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

you deportal first wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,913
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

Don't worry. They were a very intentional countermove to yours.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,791
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

dont  overjump us orion i wanna kick you big_smile

Lazyness> we are fighting with knives against guys with machine guns

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,913
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

You can try

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

12 Reply by LG

  • LG
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5,713
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

Our relations with 3683 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 1 weeks

getting nervous

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,913
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

Nice Jump colo. Sure that's enough figs? ;-)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

14 Reply by LG

  • LG
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5,713
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

and they just jump ground go for bankers well played / what a joke this is.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,913
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

I think the phrase you're looking for is: "They played us like a violin"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

16 Reply by LG

  • LG
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5,713
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

ya you probably would play a violin

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

17 Reply by bretthepet (edited by bretthepet 13-Jan-2017 22:11:06)

  • Posts: 264
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

[Whining post]

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

Thats why i didnt take a popper this round.. But dang u guys lost already?? Really? It aint even been 8 hrs??

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,913
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

It is now tick 3 of war. War started 2 ticks ago Don.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,913
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

-------------------
175 from #3681
-------------------

-------------------
5 to #3681
-------------------

Nap has been offered, this tick and the previous.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

21 Reply by LG

  • LG
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5,713
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

ya costs me 69 moral to attack.

I really thought we would be going attacker vs attacker. had my hopes up

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 264
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

We lost 5 minutes into war. Might aswell nap and call it quits it's just going to be a losing battle of ping pong.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,913
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

81 - that pnap is still on table. This is silly.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 264
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

Colo not on I'm the only one on, no one cares any more I doubt our pop banker is even going to log back on any more.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: 3683 vs. 3681

that was a really fast war

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points