• Posts: 909
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

there's stuff happening as we speak. but probably not in the phase you guys want it to be smile

KX

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Big1
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 456

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

yow we can see the news

RICKING

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 340
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

I hope our moderators are taking notes after watching the news ticker tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

79 Reply by LG

  • LG
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5,713
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

70 won't be caught

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • RareUK
  • RareUK
  • Imperial Activist
  • Offline
  • Posts: 569
  • Tag points: 29

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

Yeah this isn't a war. 

Just 1000 attacks VS the 3 retakes were allowed to do every 4 ticks.

Hallucinogen UK
IC Avatars: https://plus.google.com/u/0/110909766643431141895/posts
Reality Grid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP7jnaRti4A
The Order Psychogenica

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 11,986
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

morale system is hilarious. And no, I have 0 constructive things to add on how to make it better. Just that this sucks.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 11,986
  • Tag points: 10

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

p.s wars ruin my awesome income. bitches be taking my money away.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 48

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

I think it is hilarious to think we are going to interfere with anything.  Our tiny family didnt have to cancel anything with 67, it didn't exist.   I did ask our leader to cancel our NAP with 66 mainly because it makes no sense to have for either family.  If I am stupid enough to jump my fleet and take on 66.. it will be to take a stupid 12 - 15 planets because of the new morale..Plus I am man enough to wait for you guys to stop your bickering...  I will say however, I am in a great position to take anyone who explores into the last area with free planets, with very little ramifications.. hahahaha!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

84 Reply by LG

  • LG
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5,713
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

End of an era. Cancel naps don't work anymore.  Fight till your done pnap and move on to the next fam and repeat

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,040
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

70 did us the same way,the difference is we had lots of shares with 66. I'm sure the mods are taking notes and will find a better way/ratio to make it a bit fair.

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

haha kinda funny.. when i made my post not many agreed.. now that they see 2 top fams fight and see the unbalance now nobody likes it and disagrees with it.. it sucks majorly like its so noobish.. and really any tweaks to the formula will cause mods to have to be more acitve and god knows that aint happening.. cause hell its only 1 mod playing anyways and its his way or the highway basically.. just cant admit they threw a faulty system into the game.. (pouring water into a engine) (sugar in a gas Tank)

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 48

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

I want to point out, I just took 4 planets from someone who has double my net worth and I lost 25% Morale per attack sad When it came to taking the 5th and 6th planet.. I cant.. sad #imperialInfra

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

Midor wrote:

I think it is hilarious to think we are going to interfere with anything.  Our tiny family didnt have to cancel anything with 67, it didn't exist.   I did ask our leader to cancel our NAP with 66 mainly because it makes no sense to have for either family.  If I am stupid enough to jump my fleet and take on 66.. it will be to take a stupid 12 - 15 planets because of the new morale..Plus I am man enough to wait for you guys to stop your bickering...  I will say however, I am in a great position to take anyone who explores into the last area with free planets, with very little ramifications.. hahahaha!


Funny huh? Why do i see you attacking while we are down? This is called vulturing and it shos yet again why these morale rules are rubbish

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

89 Reply by Carrera GT (edited by Undeath 24-Feb-2016 17:30:21)

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

Have fun all, i am out of here. The last drop:
    [don't post coords yo]

Raiding in the middle of a war... Should ban this guy forever. Morale ruls to prevent farming my ass

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 91
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

SHUT UP carrera GT, we had the same thing happened to us when we canceled.  You were the #1 in the galaxy and u cant stand up to a fam with 3 people?  You should be banned for sucking so much.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

91 Reply by Carrera GT (edited by Undeath 24-Feb-2016 17:29:34)

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

how old are you? 4? Can't believe your reply. Since when is vulturing ok? They waited for you to take our fleets out and take 68 planets in one tick, costs 100% morale for one retake eventhough he is my size an nw.

you don' t see how this is wrong?

Eventhough we lost 300 planets to you guys it were all banker planets, and i am very close to removing all of your attackers from our core, not that many left, so we could retake those in the next few days. But what 73 is pulling here is complete madness. If you are saying what they are doing and are capable of is alright you are insane....

this is [Imperial Conflict]!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,791
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

Pitbull wrote:

70 did us the same way,the difference is we had lots of shares with 66. I'm sure the mods are taking notes and will find a better way/ratio to make it a bit fair.


way difference pittbull i figted my way in big_smile

Lazyness> we are fighting with knives against guys with machine guns

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

93 Reply by domi06 (edited by domi06 28-Jan-2016 17:54:13)

  • Posts: 803
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

hahah colo you explored your way in

And midor, what you are doing is the definition of vulturing and if you are too stupid to understand why they dont have fleets right now then there is no hope for you. And it is sad that the morale rules have actually made vulturing super easy because they can't even retake anything due to how small and pathetic you are

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

94 Reply by Processor VX (edited by Processor VX 28-Jan-2016 18:09:32)

  • Posts: 275
  • Tag points: 13

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

New morale destroys morale IRL. Hopefully you guys can get this tuned better. After this round it will probably be another long absence for myself.

P.S. Still top rezzer lol.

mbvX, jamjam, nobody, smax

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 134
  • Tag points: 1

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

all this years.. round after round it was always accepted that the bigger fams farmed smaller fams..
now someone found a way to turn the tides around and he should be banned?
As far as i know you still have 100 times my NW and a buttload of planets more then me.
in what way are you losing this round exactly?

ofcourse it doesnt make sense that you cant do anything about it. and i totally agree the morale rules should be fixed.. this is insane.
But if i havn't done this nothing would happen.
and please stop crying.. i only took 3 to 4% of your total planet count

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 275
  • Tag points: 13

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

Epiknicedude wrote:

all this years.. round after round it was always accepted that the bigger fams farmed smaller fams..
now someone found a way to turn the tides around and he should be banned?
As far as i know you still have 100 times my NW and a buttload of planets more then me.
in what way are you losing this round exactly?

ofcourse it doesnt make sense that you cant do anything about it. and i totally agree the morale rules should be fixed.. this is insane.
But if i havn't done this nothing would happen.
and please stop crying.. i only took 3 to 4% of your total planet count

You did nothing all round and get to profit off a family that did very highly coordinated builds. The morale system is basically welfare for the unfortunate or lazy that end up on the bottom of the IC ladder.

mbvX, jamjam, nobody, smax

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

97 Reply by Epiknicedude (edited by Undeath 24-Feb-2016 17:28:21)

  • Posts: 134
  • Tag points: 1

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

ow yeah so being on your own as a camaar means you do nothing all round and you're just a lazy punk..
dont you think all those smaller fams in the past didnt do their best and work their ass off only to be farmed round after round by the same guys over and over?

you guys need to grow some [fuzzy?] balls and stop acting like little girls.
67 saw it coming and removed me from their cores and kept their bankers in a tight core.

good job on 66 for having a good infra but your war tactics suck balls

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

98 Reply by Processor VX (edited by Undeath 24-Feb-2016 17:28:41)

  • Posts: 275
  • Tag points: 13

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

Epiknicedude wrote:

ow yeah so being on your own as a camaar means you do nothing all round and you're just a lazy punk..
dont you think all those smaller fams in the past didnt do their best and work their ass off only to be farmed round after round by the same guys over and over?

you guys need to grow some [fuzzy!] balls and stop acting like little girls.
67 saw it coming and removed me from their cores and kept their bankers in a tight core.

good job on 66 for having a good infra but your war tactics suck balls

Yes I do think all the bottom fams didn't "do their best" or "work their ass off". They were on the bottom for a reason. I'm not mad at you because you are just playing a system catered to losers.

mbvX, jamjam, nobody, smax

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

ok so 73 had his time vulturing...

next in line: 71

they also feel it's time to cancel on us during war
Our relations with 1971 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 48 weeks.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 237
  • Tag points: 18

Re: 1967 vs 1966 (Real War Coming)

Carrera GT wrote:

ok so 73 had his time vulturing...

next in line: 71

they also feel it's time to cancel on us during war
Our relations with 1971 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 48 weeks.



FROM HAYDON - Leader of 71

Week 43, 18Save - Send Another Message
Our old leader P-napped everyone else but the bottom two fams.

We are only planning to get you out of our core.

You are no.1

It does not make sense to attack 7 & 8th. The people who do things like that are the reason why we dont keep new players.

I want to show the mods how terrible the moral system is, you probably wont even have enough to do retakes from me alone on 15 planets.

We are not going after your cores so don't worry.
Sent to FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points