• Posts: 398
  • Tag points: 4

Topic: Possible New Galaxy

1. Smaller fams to produce more fams (5 memebers)
2. fixed structure  (2 camaar / 1 partaxian / 1 quantam / 1 revalons)
3. Playground style draft - Forum Sign up (To come depending on vote outcome)
4. No market during the first 14 days. (depending on mod options)
5. Smaller map size (50 * 50)
6. Fewer systems (500 Systems)
7. Reduced starting res (10000gc, 400 Iron, 1000 Food, 75 Octarium, 75 Endurium)
8. Round Length 3 months (Partly due to reduced SOR resources)
9. No Allies
10. No Naps
11. No Rules, IAs permitted
12. Attack limits will be adjusted (if possible) to compensate for no allies and IA's


Ok guys/gals, I know we want a democracy, but unfortunately these options are not up for debate. Lets try something new and see how it works. Changes can be made for future attempts.

If you are intrigued or would like to give this a try then vote yes. If you are happy plodding along as is then vote no.

Due to a virulent strain of moronic mods, your population are worried they will spawn some of their own therefore they have resorted to wearing mod-idoms. Pop growth is reduced by half.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • LG
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 5,713
  • Tag points: 19

Re: Possible New Galaxy

I can't remember a draft or atleast being part of one for five years. I'd like to do it.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

3 Reply by Render

  • Render
  • Guest
  • Tag points: 76

Re: Possible New Galaxy

9. No Allies
10. No Naps
11. No Rules, IAs permitted

looks like a gal for rogues, you kannot do legal allies but you kan do ilegal allies, you kannot nap so whenever you win a war you'll have to kill them or forze them into your IA party

Not surprised this idea koming from you, definatly, a gal for rogues.

However I'm not against it, it would be fun to see the kaos and the bitzhing after 4 weeks into the round, the fmods would have a lot of job in forums.

IDEA ---> Arrange the damn ally thing and do normal gals like we had when the game was alive, tri-allianzes (yes with fams sized 5 it is possible), limited naps (remember when you kould only nap 10 fams in a gal of 100 ??), and only then you kan allow IAs. 
Kant you see the logik?  you kannot allow IAs when there aint LAs   wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

4 Reply by .:]FfT[:. Dead Kennedys (edited by .:]FfT[:. Dead Kennedys 25-Oct-2014 00:05:16)

  • Posts: 2,204
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Possible New Galaxy

I dunno, seems fun but I would really like to see allies.

Since you said this Sushi

"Ok guys/gals, I know we want a democracy, but unfortunately these options are not up for debate. Lets try something new and see how it works. Changes can be made for future attempts."

I will have to vote no then

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 398
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Possible New Galaxy

At least Ive been honest DK, anyone reading or posting now has a oint of reference to base a decision. Atleast Ive been honest and offered a straight forward decision to be made.

Due to a virulent strain of moronic mods, your population are worried they will spawn some of their own therefore they have resorted to wearing mod-idoms. Pop growth is reduced by half.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,590
  • Tag points: 70

Re: Possible New Galaxy

1. Smaller fams to produce more fams (5 memebers)

YES!

2. fixed structure  (2 camaar / 1 partaxian / 1 quantam / 1 revalons)

NO! Give ppl chance to make new strats.

3. Playground style draft - Forum Sign up (To come depending on vote outcome)

YES!

4. No market during the first 14 days. (depending on mod options)

NO! I need my dose of market play!

5. Smaller map size (50 * 50)

YES!

6. Fewer systems (500 Systems)

YES!

7. Reduced starting res (10000gc, 400 Iron, 1000 Food, 75 Octarium, 75 Endurium)

YES!

8. Round Length 3 months (Partly due to reduced SOR resources)

NO! Smaller map, 2.5 months max.

9. No Allies

YES!

10. No Naps

NO! Only ban perm NAPs!

11. No Rules, IAs permitted

NO! This game revolves around too few individuals already and personal relationships tend to be more important than family relationships, no need to empower these ppl more!

12. Attack limits will be adjusted (if possible) to compensate for no allies and IA's

YES! Adjust by removing Sentinel tag!

My humble opinions.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 398
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Possible New Galaxy

Hey zan bud, we can discuss this more in fam chat. But if you agree to reduced start res then surely you realise that means it takes longer to grow and therefore a longer round is needed?

Thats why current rounds are short and sweet.

Due to a virulent strain of moronic mods, your population are worried they will spawn some of their own therefore they have resorted to wearing mod-idoms. Pop growth is reduced by half.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366
  • Tag points: 13

Re: Possible New Galaxy

you set a team to have one banker is a fail, with set races,
this game is too dead,

just make some smaller teams with 1 ally

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

9 Reply by Render

  • Render
  • Guest
  • Tag points: 76

Re: Possible New Galaxy

I would vote yez for the gal Zanharim propozed, honeztly.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,204
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Possible New Galaxy

Suicidal Sushi wrote:

At least Ive been honest DK, anyone reading or posting now has a oint of reference to base a decision. Atleast Ive been honest and offered a straight forward decision to be made.

I agree and I too was being honest.  Good luck and have fun.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

11 Reply by Radiation. (edited by Radiation. 25-Oct-2014 09:32:25)

  • Posts: 167
  • Tag points: 50

Re: Possible New Galaxy

Inexperienced players just get farmed/slaughtered by the "VETS".  Thats why the player base has diminished so much.
The family networth rule was brought in too late, everybody's gone.

- Max family size = 6. 
- Bring in galactic protection earlier.

"One day we shall see the dragon smiling."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,599

Re: Possible New Galaxy

1. Smaller fams to produce more fams (5 memebers) - good
2. fixed structure  (2 camaar / 1 partaxian / 1 quantam / 1 revalons) - no need
3. Playground style draft - Forum Sign up (To come depending on vote outcome) - no need / no drafts
4. No market during the first 14 days. (depending on mod options) - good
5. Smaller map size (50 * 50) - good
6. Fewer systems (500 Systems)  - good
7. Reduced starting res (10000gc, 400 Iron, 1000 Food, 75 Octarium, 75 Endurium) - good
8. Round Length 3 months (Partly due to reduced SOR resources) - good
9. No Allies - 1 ally
10. No Naps - 2 naps total / no p-naps
11. No Rules, IAs permitted - no IA's
12. Attack limits will be adjusted (if possible) to compensate for no allies and IA's - no need

"It's very quiet on the political arena. I wish someone would stir up some trouble!"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

13 Reply by Render

  • Render
  • Guest
  • Tag points: 76

Re: Possible New Galaxy

9. No Allies - 1 ally
10. No Naps - 2 naps total / no p-naps

NOT possible, they dont know how to do it, they are unable to enable allianzes in the game, and the naps are set unlimited for a long time now bekause they dont know how to zhange it.  No devs & unezperienzed mods, maybe you Orbit have what it takes to do it or maybe they wont let you touzh the kode at all.  In any kase this thread goes nowhere.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,940
  • Tag points: 91

Re: Possible New Galaxy

Sounds like a normal gal to me, lets do ittttT!!

Everybody wants it anyways from my point of view! =P

Immigrants make a difference
We are all immigrants
We all make a difference
How are we all immigrants?
- Our souls are not from here

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: Possible New Galaxy

LOL SOME OF U GUYS ARE HARDHEADED.. Issues

1). They are not enough people who can lead a fam
2). Not enough attackers to play in all

Making smaller fams will result in more and more farming

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,595
  • Tag points: 241

Re: Possible New Galaxy

Sol Invictus wrote:

Sounds like a normal gal to me, lets do ittttT!!

Everybody wants it anyways from my point of view! =P

I must say, it's hilarious to see a thread where 90% of the posts are people suggesting changes to the suggested galaxy... only to finish off with that last sentence of this post.  Seriously, that point of view must have been looking at porn, because that view definitely wasn't pointed at this thread.  big_smile

Make Eyes Great Again!

The Great Eye is watching you... when there's nothing good on TV...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 748

Re: Possible New Galaxy

1. Smaller fams to produce more fams (5 memebers) yop
2. fixed structure  (2 camaar / 1 partaxian / 1 quantam / 1 revalons) no
3. Playground style draft - Forum Sign up (To come depending on vote outcome)no. randoms. players randoming and not playing getting blocked?
4. No market during the first 14 days. (depending on mod options) yo
5. Smaller map size (50 * 50) yo
6. Fewer systems (500 Systems) yo
7. Reduced starting res (10000gc, 400 Iron, 1000 Food, 75 Octarium, 75 Endurium)no
8. Round Length 3 months (Partly due to reduced SOR resources) no
9. No Allies no
10. No Naps yes
11. No Rules, IAs permitted -- would be as always
12. Attack limits will be adjusted (if possible) to compensate for no allies and IA's nah. lets be able to kill everything and hope people show honor and stop if familys are too small.. 

no attack limits no % nothing.. just allow a 50 mil fam to attack a 50k fam.. who cares.. if a fam with no infra get to many planets it is their fault. In the past we had to be carefull with exploring. If we explored too many planets we knew enemy would take! so..

Leonardo, Michelangelo, Donatello, Raphael

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage_Mu … ja_Turtles

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 748

Re: Possible New Galaxy

{Black Mafia} IC Death wrote:

LOL SOME OF U GUYS ARE HARDHEADED.. Issues

1). They are not enough people who can lead a fam
2). Not enough attackers to play in all

Making smaller fams will result in more and more farming


lets get farming on!

big gamechanges wont happening anyway.. every idea get smashed every idea which need new programming dont happen either..

lets player what we can play before ic die.. it is getting worse

Leonardo, Michelangelo, Donatello, Raphael

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage_Mu … ja_Turtles

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 706
  • Tag points: 5

Re: Possible New Galaxy

make it as optional galaxy and see what will be
and leave SB and SN

Taranul de oras, cel mai prost animal !
Idiots are ruin the country !

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 771
  • Tag points: 374

Re: Possible New Galaxy

i'm enjoying the feedback being offered..

You might be a king or little kid sweeper.  Sooner or later, you'll dance with the Reaper....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,940
  • Tag points: 91

Re: Possible New Galaxy

The Great Eye wrote:
Sol Invictus wrote:

Sounds like a normal gal to me, lets do ittttT!!

Everybody wants it anyways from my point of view! =P

I must say, it's hilarious to see a thread where 90% of the posts are people suggesting changes to the suggested galaxy... only to finish off with that last sentence of this post.  Seriously, that point of view must have been looking at porn, because that view definitely wasn't pointed at this thread.  big_smile


I had a feeling it be you indeed to make the first pr0n reference when I said POV. You one-handed-typing-stake!

@ Everybody requesting feedback, its weekend and I woke up after falling a sleep waiting for tick, nn luvs!

Immigrants make a difference
We are all immigrants
We all make a difference
How are we all immigrants?
- Our souls are not from here

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,404
  • Tag points: 33

Re: Possible New Galaxy

I mis the reason behind this proposal. What is to be accomplished with these changes?

In my opinion: People that get killed after 2 weeks won't come back after 2 months.I you want to keep people interested they have to feel they have a chance next time. And that next time has to be soon, so they won't run off to another game.

Would be nice to have glaxcy that reaches maximum conflict in 2 weeks and finshes after a certain goal is reached. i.e. first to 200 planets of first to 3 million NW, with a maximum duration of five weeks.

The current proposal would yield in around 9000 (500 systems * 18 a system) planets for lets say 65 active players. On avarage there are 138 planets a person. I think this number should be below 80 or even 50 to have maximum conflict after 2 weeks.

Would be nice if players would get 1 million research points at start of round on construction so portal building time is limited at the beginning of the round.

~Attacking is a Skill~
~Defending is an Art~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,842
  • Tag points: 4137

Re: Possible New Galaxy

Devilz wrote:

you set a team to have one banker is a fail, with set races,
this game is too dead,

just make some smaller teams with 1 ally


1 banker race??? lol quantams make damn fine pop bankers

I believe in angels and unicorns

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,611
  • Tag points: 19

Re: Possible New Galaxy

Zan is a smart man

~ Cloud

"I Cannot Awake From This Nightmare As Long As You Exist..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points