Heh... fat chance that passes... gotta get past Conservative and Libertarian delegates... I don't see that happening.

Who cares about the RNC? They're little different than democrats.

Romney won't significantly cut deficits if elected. He wouldn't try much, and he'd meet heavy resistance if he did. Little different than Obama.

Romney won't simplify the tax code and reduce rates. People have given lip-service to this notion for decades, but nothing's been done. They like the bribes. So long as people elect Republicans and Democrats and neither party ever follows through on this promise, there's absolutely no pressure to ever do so. It's not like the other guy's gonna.

I don't know if he'll protect my second amendment rights or believe it reasonable to limit the crap out of them.

I don't know if he's for doctors choosing not to care for babies that survive abortion like Obama. I don't have the most strict anti-abortion stance because trash will find all kinds of ways to do it anyway (though I'm not for using violence to cover-up mistakes, which is what abortion is), but I'd still like to know what the guy thinks. I wish he had the balls to say. Or, more honestly (and accurately), I wish the Amerikan people weren't so dense and stupid that it obviously polls better for him NOT to say.

The average Amerikan voter is so stupid and valueless that he'd rather a candidate openly have no position, openly pander for votes with absolutely no promise of policy, position, or advocacy, than have a position which some people partially disagree with.

I'd rather support a candidate whose positions I don't fully agree with than a candidate who essentially has no positions. But I'm obviously in the minority. As it turns out, most people are suckers.

The RNC is leading Amerika in being just a little bit less bad than Obama. They attack personal freedoms, just like Democrats. They support big government, cronyism, and bribery, just like Democrats. They support pointless foreign wars (worse yet, warfare for foreign nations who aren't even allies--gotta please the NWO!), just like Democrats.

You can't conduct foreign affairs that anyone in the world respects when you're corrupt, valueless trash. Bush was often hated; Obama is constantly laughed at. Neither was/is remotely competent and capable of handling foreign affairs.

What's the big difference? There isn't one. They just have slightly different focuses of their attacks on freedom and expansion of federal powers. They just have areas of slightly less pitiful rhetoric in defense of freedoms; rhetoric which they inevitably fail to back up when defense of those freedoms is actually necessary.

He's for the gay now, he said the Boy Scouts should have accepted gay scoutmasters

Since he probably "camps" in a 5 bedroom beachhouse somebody should explain it to him

and before you blow up I believe George Takei when he says gay people are just like me except they're attracted to the same sex

this means every gay man is looking at my ass

if you passed me by on the street I'd look at your ass too, it would be hard to miss no?

> The Yell wrote:

> and before you blow up I believe George Takei when he says gay people are just like me except they're attracted to the same sex

this means every gay man is looking at my ass <

You're now every woman ever.

GOP convention attendant thrown out for throwing peanuts at a black CNN camerawoman while shouting "this is how we feed animals"

insult is in the eye of the beholder though, I, for one, am sure that Primo would appreciate men throwing their nuts in his face while shouting "this is how we feed animals"

http://theweek.com/article/index/232670/the-media-coverage-of-paul-ryans-speech-15-euphemisms-for-lying

the speech of Romney was pretty bad. better elect Ryan for president...

You look at who's gonna speak for the Democrats and I think they should go with the empty chair

but yeah I thought having an actor up there makes the whole thing look like a traveling sideshow