Maybe if I was sober and the door was slammed by a drunken child, we can work with that analogy. 
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/sports/31324396/detail.html
"Only 10% of drugs cheats are being caught at the Olympics. former anti-doping chief Dick Pound told CNN on Wednesday."
"If you get caught you fail two tests, a drugs test and an IQ test."
The more I read about performance-enhancing drugs and how many people get away with using them, the more confident I am that I'm going to be an Olympian!
Woohoo! I've added to the content, Mr. Yell. It's time to celebrate! I was just being sarcastic before.
People had questioned my claims that China is more capable than freer nations of covering up doping, Poley. I merely substantiated my claims.
My last post was admittedly horribly off-topic.
"A few lives' imprisonment or death is nothing compared to the Chinese nation and Olympic team saving face."
This garbage has NOTHING to do with the Olympic team saving face by covering up doping!
"it's possible she's legitimate. I've simply given reasons why China's authoritarian regime and past actions make it suspect under these circumstances."
Again, totally off topic! In no way does this statement from my last off-topic post relate to circumstances making China's Olympic team suspect!
I did respond to silly questions regarding substantiating my claims, which were a premise for my conclusion that China is particularly suspect. But premises for my arguments are on-topic insofar as my arguments depend on them.
If I make arguments (which constitute the topic) based on premises and those premises are questioned, supporting them is very obviously relevant to the topic. I fail to see why this doesn't make sense to you.
[I wish I could obey forum rules]