Re: 4182 vs 4180
render does it look like i have that opp? guess again ![]()
edit: infact, go check, no one in my fam has that opp ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 4182 vs 4180
render does it look like i have that opp? guess again ![]()
edit: infact, go check, no one in my fam has that opp ![]()
Flashy, assuming it's a plant/generate false info op that you're talking about, go check Squeaky's op list ![]()
could have should have whatever!
we could have went to war with 75 and owned the crap out of them:D
no you couldnt of.... and render reason you end up top 5 all the time is cause you farm.
that's rubbish and you know it, render uses excellent diplo and picks fights he knows he can win... had we been farming we would have went for fams much lower than we did... we attacked the fams that were ranked highest and we didn't have any relations with... if that is farming nowadays, i guess everybody has been farming except bottom 5..
> Render wrote:
> lol crazyone you understood wrong, I aint deleting, I said we ALL of us "should" have deleted when the top4 fams napped at midround to war at eor, that's what i said. I mean a round is wasted when you aren't allowed to win, no matter waht you try
and yes I could destroy my fleet and rape you, but there's no point in losing NW and gain planets when you aint fighting to win size anymore, cause its ALL SETTLED
No render round was over when you agree'd to NAP us and let us war... by doing that you basically conceded you couldn't beat either of our alliances and would allow us to fight FTW. Do you not understand IC at all?
> Tryme wrote:
> WS we were gonna fight you in a cancellation war but i guess YOU wimped out, rather than us.. wasn't it you that demanded a pnap? rather than going for the 48hr nap we offered?
Just check the ranks we owned you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's so easy to talk shit when you're PNAP'd to both of our alliances and say you are top shit and weren't beaten but the only reason you're talking is because you have that PNAP to save you.
> General Mizzle wrote:
> Just for the record we could have ended up in war with render and we could have owned them but it was just before war with ws so would be dumb to spend savings
This is the true reason you aren't dead from both sides.
I really wish we'd decided that killing render > EoR war... what were we thinking?
lol silv i d so pwn u
no uh cus i'd pwn u first n00b
we didn't want pnaps with the top fams, they insisted on having those with us because they wanted to have their gay 12 ticks of eor 'fun' .... what an epic war it was!
Rin ur so pwned n00b refer to sig ez pz son.
We are still 7th in size!!
PWNZOR!
And even now its a CF banker VS #80 ![]()
> General Mizzle wrote:
> Just for the record we could have ended up in war with render and we could have owned them but it was just before war with ws so would be dumb to spend savings
You will never know, yes you COULD but you will never know, you just chose to save for your gay war that lasted 6 tics
come on, just to clarify things
1. We started attacking 72 and cleared Lohan spots near our core and even further, it was when I started to clear Mizzle when they came asking for nap and acepted to surrender 4 planets in the surrounds, for the sake of gay eor wars WE LET YOU BE, now you say you could have spent your saves and rape us, MAYBE you COULD, but the real fact is your spots to attack us in core systems where all CLEARED. The most probable is that in a war 75/72 vs 73/80 by that time you should beat us in the end (considering 75 did nothing during all the round but infrawhore and save, and maybe farm some noobish fam out there). But a war 72 vs 80 your chances were really poor.
2. More or less happened the same with 74/66, the difference is 74 came here whining when they noticed we were clearing there from our land. I went to negotiate with WS directly because the guys in 74 were acting like morons sending blackmail and threatening my ally and stuff like that. I proposed WS a 48h nap so we could fight before eor, always considering his alliance were the winners of the stargays, but yeah he was not so confident of that victory and changed to pNAP.
That's the story, now you can say what you want but it wont change my mind I feel the same about you, now you can tell me your reasons but it wont change my .....oh shit
this is a gay song!
And gay is all this topis is about.
yay ![]()
> HoaD wrote:
> And gay is all this topis is about.
yes the 'topis' is so gay, so is your avatar tho ![]()
if we can continue posting like this, we will surpass the war thread of 75/72 vs 66/74 ![]()
> CrazyOne wrote:
> if we can continue posting like this, we will surpass the war thread of 75/72 vs 66/74 ![]()
because this war is way more interesting ![]()
templare -> "we had the balls to fight the top alliance even when odds are stacked against us. not to mention 75 had to recover from a BoR war with them. Also Lohan + Mizzle > Tryme and Render icon39
also allow me to reiterate that this is the first time in 4 rounds I didn't get to kill your fam Render big_smile"
I have to repeat Lohan and Mizzle lost their spots to fight my fam, their chances alone were just jump high and send ranged fleets (to our DSs).
75 had to recover from a bor what?? guys you fled like rats when WS raped your ally, and same did 72 with their ally 77, runaway from trouble when you see your allies fall
cheers coward
also alow me to reiterate I never play 2 consecutive rounds, so you're talking about waht, 6 rounds ago??? not to mention the low moves you used to "win" those war to my fam, it'd take some pages to re-write all what happened on those days, plus your glory means only dishonour to me. I keep myself and the fams I lead out of the trash you bring to this game ![]()
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 4182 vs 4180
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.