This is a direct result from 40 and 41 hitting 35 while 35 was simply trying to defend their systems from 41 infiltrating.  40 also ran Colorado and was removing portals last night

um no.  You're mistaken.  Aleph ran Colo last night and was picking off portals.  Colo then jumped and ran Aleph.  Thanks for trying to reverse the facts though.

aleph took a couple of planets. might have been portals might not, i do not know. nowhere did he actually run him. though colorado did jump and ran one planet of alephs about 10 times last night. you got half of it right.

The details are insignificant imo.  Aleph took the time to target Colo's portals and run down his fleet (simply hitting portals or indeed fig running), so it's an act of war imo.  I'm not going to let my allies potentially be 2v1'ed, especially now that you've won the 25/31 war and are farming them (and justly so, since Lee broke on you).

If Aleph had simply continued to hit 25/31, I would be ok with that.  Going out of your way last night to target Colo and hit his portals and try to limit him when in another war signals you don't have enough to do atm.  My allies requested help, they will get help.  It seems you also have been hitting 33 (from Hookers' whiny messages in Uni ), so it kind of proves you don't have much to do.

BTW - My fam debated whether to just cancel on one of you or both - I decided it would truly be farming if we focused efforts on one fam so that's why we cancelled on both.

what does FTFY mean?

Fixed That For You or something like that

ya zora im not QQ they dont need a reason to cancel nap other than it is a time that gives their fam maximum advantage. thats all they need to say not some bs about colo

> thirdrock wrote:

> ya zora im not QQ they dont need a reason to cancel nap other than it is a time that gives their fam maximum advantage. thats all they need to say not some bs about colo

How is bs about Colo?  Aleph his Colo and ran down his fleet by taking multiple portals.  It's obviously escalating between you both and I won't stand to have my ally 2v1'ed.  Would you rather I only cancelled on one of you and focused on only one of you?  Or would you rather a clean 2v2?

I think you would have chosen the latter.  Glue sure did threaten enough 2v1's this round, but a nice 2v2 will be good for us both.

oxy: i personally wanted to nap colo's fam with core clause and have a 2v2 at a set date in a week or so, but colo wouldn't nap because he wanted the whole 1/2 of S3 as a core

anyway point is moot. gl hf everyone

Week 0, 15
We are going to void.

Signed, O of Oxygen (3943)

blah, *aren't X(  I thought my lack of voiding on 18 when I was allied to 25 was proof enough that I don't void unless it's legit imo.  But that's another story and this is about our sexy war.

Here's to a clean, sexy war.

Whatever Oxygen,

Polish a turd, and it's still a turd, so over-articulate a bullshit excuse, and it's still a bullshit excuse.

Glad you weren't looking for my respect, as clearly you don't deserve mine, or anyone elses'

How? We are still in a war with 31/25 --

Sure, why not i'm down for fighting 4 top families, why not clearly that isn't a big deal is it - clearly takes skill to cancel on 2 fams that have already been warring for weeks, and had NAPs broken on, SURE kick em why there down! ITS THE IC WAY WOOHOOOO