dont see y that makes the a hholes? u were pretty close in size and nw or i got that wrong?

i like , good effort more than most make

> ~*~Serenity~*~ wrote:

> > Hardcore1012 wrote:

> lol behave i never said i was a great player but neither are u cos i played with u in sd notso long ago lol im just saying naps at sor are given away to easy gone are the days of no nap fams

Youve never "played" with me in SD because Im always inactive.

well that will be y your sry ass got killed of

> Timmyville wrote:

> *rolls eyes*

Ever think that maybe the big fams are big BECAUSE of the diplomatic decisions that are made? It's never predetermined who the big fams are gonna be. Some fams are just more active, or they plan better, or what have you.

Everybody talks of a "conspiracy" against the small fams. They're not small until they fall behind. And they fall behind because they're not active enough or not committed enough. And then when their lack of commitment/activity shows itself, they come to uni and whine about how the "big fams bully".

Stop whining, and start growing. Kill off your inactives! Motivate your people to be active! Ask somebody how to plan a good start strategy! Make the competition better! Don't just whine about how it's not good!

lol maybe they are big becaues of diplo but back in the day the would of fought for said nap rather than probably  getting it b4 round even started like "pussys" would but hey imperial diplo clearly works, i got an idea y dont the entire gal nap and all just have eor wars

ive never head of such a kerfuffle

u better believe it lol

but like skyline reads it looks pretty bang on either of u cant claim a hard fought victory they way u played it so far, but who know maybe there is a surprise in store u both cant live up to the reputation u al got so far

lol still makes me laugh when peple are still shocked about being flamed in the forums, thats pretty much all theier here for these days

> Render wrote:

> I am not in Capri also but changing rules in mid round is not the right way to fix a problem. You should have predicted the effects caused by the rule, if you were not able to predict then the correct is to wait until round ends and fix it.

I dont think it is abuse of power, it is a reasonable change imo, but doing it in mid-round is wrong, because it sets a precedence for future rounds. One example: you change a standard race with improvements and  test it in a round, then it appears the improvements were too strong and bankers whine, then, do you remove improvements at mid round??

come on guys, a little of common sense.

says it all^^^

whats the deal if u didnt play last round and u join what looks like a good fam but there expecting old fam members to join back via this thread? will i be booted out cos im new to the fam?

sucks

indeed,nw would becopme less affected by eor jumps

and as for Zanharim' naps i happen to know he naped #11 long b4 alph joind him, as i remember flashy saying he was hannded an intresting nap proposal