Because i do not see teh reason to go brag about everything i do... your fam hasnt showed the character this round to refrain from vulturing anyways, so little point

Thanks for admitting it pitbul, im glad you are ridiculing Tobias, first he goes out tooting his horn agains vultures, now you admit to behing one

Real class

me neither 52 57 decided we needed help i guess

make an IC ap!!!!

Tip of the day

1. Go to school
2. Learn to read
3. Check the thread about 29
4. Figure out it was 29 that hit 49
5. Facepalm and admit defeat

why would you say that You Fool in a thread that clearly states y ou whining like one

Well why dont you ask me aswell then ?

sent btw

Ok my defence, summed up so you dont have to go around it:

1. We agreed to have peace between our fams straight from sor
2. We have all round had NAP declared on your fam, but you never declared back
3. When you attacked us one of our attackers just thought he would retaliate a little i guess
4. Nap was allready offered reinstated before we took more than 30 (remember that is after you took 10 planets from us, so its just 20 really)

You Fool please learn game mechanics

29 is below our 35% rule, if they had not broken nap on us, they were perfectly safe. But when they start clearing us, we do have bankers we need to defend. Obviously they cannot be trusted.

3129 should have either signed ingame nap like we wanted to, or made their player rouge. They have done neither and therefore have no right to whine when we remove them following a napbreak

would need alot more parameters i think, but for ppl unable to do the calc themselves i think it would be a decent tool.

However comparing empires would be a much more relevant comparison.

Also ROI meassured how? Thats very much debatable because of the compoundment of investments in IC

you figured this out now :S?

So many people talking without knowing the story and just being out to flame...