2,151

(147 replies, posted in Politics)

Machiavelli agrees with me.

2,152

(147 replies, posted in Politics)

We should support Israel because of their strategic political value. Screw morality, lets only consider strategic value. They keep a kind of balance of power in the ME that's favorable to the west.

If the Palestinians won't stop, who says we can't be ruthless? Who would dare challenge the American Empire if our policy was this: Either enjoy the benefits of being our allies and trade partners, or be destroyed by our imperial might. That's was Rome's policy, and it works great. Playing the morality game like the British Empire is just silly.

The exception would be with countries we can not destroy, or whose existence is too valuable, in which case detente and balance of power would be the policies pursued. But for a marginalized people in the middle of a proxy war, who cares?

2,153

(145 replies, posted in Politics)

The traditional racial taxonomy just doesn't work genetically. Though looking different, a European may be closer genetically with an African than his European neighbor, meaning that there is no significant genetic difference between "racial groups" to justify dividing them in to sub species.

However, as a result of cultural conditioning, I find blacks in the US to be goddamn annoying overall. They irritate me with their majority distribution of whining, victim mentality, and hip hop/rap culture. Someone needs to whip those black youth in to shape and teach em discipline, the value of education, and how to stfu.

2,154

(10 replies, posted in Politics)

I want to know why he did not assume near absolute power in 1975 when he could have, and instead progressed his country toward a democracy with him as a constitutional monarch.

2,155

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

Xeno,

Wait so, because Capitalism has not solved the ages old problem of world hunger, it makes it in to a failure? It may not mold the world in to your fantasy expectation, but that doesn't mean it doesn't work.

2,156

(28 replies, posted in General)

I'm not perfect.

2,157

(39 replies, posted in Politics)

> avogadro wrote:

> Justinian; thats like asking if equality has been tested. no, because if you get close to it, your definition of what it is becomes more strict. its an ideology, it cant be achieved.>>

Yeah, well it's still a good policy to rely on theories that have a good track record on the macro scale, and limit the radically new ones to the micro scale.

And I think you will find that, in political history, equality has been gradual. Little increments here and there lead to more bolder levels. The radical changes in a short period of time also tended to lead to disaster.

2,158

(39 replies, posted in Politics)

Acolyte,

Has such a system ever been empirically tested? I may be more inclined to support the extreme if such a system was actually practiced with success. Just saying we get in to trouble whenever we say "Hey check this new grand plan with all these benefits! Theoretically it should work! Now lets implement it!"

2,159

(39 replies, posted in Politics)

That's cuz those socialists are printing more $ like mad.

2,160

(39 replies, posted in Politics)

Those evil democrats caused the housing crisis by imposing sub prime mortgage quotas. As for the other crises, I can only guess that the dems are at fault for that too.

2,161

(24 replies, posted in Politics)

Zarf,

Traffic wasn't bad when I was there. Though I can tell you that Phoenix is worse.... golf carts... everywhere.

Soth,

No offense bro, but I think it's about time you get a new car.

2,162

(72 replies, posted in Politics)

But much of US military spending has to do with occupation costs in Iraq and Afghanistan.

2,163

(111 replies, posted in General)

Maple clubbing, rofl.

2,164

(27 replies, posted in Politics)

Rooster,

Of course supporting animal rights is wrong, well it is for rats, monkeys, cattle, and other animals we use as instruments that drive our economy. By appealing to the moral sensitivities of others, it causes people to campaign for concessions that only cause further inefficiencies in the pharmaceutical and food markets, driving up prices. It's also a sin to give a crap, but even worse to exploit people's sensitivities for political influence like that. The same goes for advocating for factory workers to keep their jobs or enjoy pension plans when it is costly for the company to do so. It's a terrible evil, one that deserves hard time.

As for authoritarian government, I guess we need one in a world of immature children incapable of managing their own rights responsibly. Civic virtue and responsibility is bankrupt in American society, which is essential to a functional Republic. As for a revolt, good. We know who is not taking their reformation seriously and is a member of the surplus population we can dump on Europe.

2,165

(27 replies, posted in Politics)

Avo,

Every law has an intended outcome, and the side effects are those things that contradict that intended outcome. It's like the old saying, "the law or the intent of the law?" The intended outcome may raise other questions about other intended outcomes. For example, with taxes we want to raise money. But this can lead to milking some families that are barely able to make it, so since we value their ability to survive we add stipulations that relax their taxing requirements. However, for the sake of argument, lets assume that the intended outcome is to punish this generation and teach them good values. As for any conceivable side effects one of us may find objectionable, lets assume all of us can be satisfied that there are adequate stipulations to prevent them. Though you may consider the intended outcome here objectionable, and that's fine, assume that you are satisfied that it and its unavoidable consequences are the only objectionable outcomes present because there are adequate stipulations to limit the others.

I'm using broad terms because I am trying to describe something that is very broad. From crazies who are in arms that animals are used in research to other crazies railing about the injustice that democracy is a facade to plutocracy. I'm covering a lot.

They're decadent because their values are the antithesis of a productive and powerful society. A society that is productive and inventive, for example, can produce a powerful nation. A society that whines about equality all day, wants regulations all day, and is dependent on government can not create a powerful society. They'll stay at the bottom or sink to the bottom.

2,166

(27 replies, posted in Politics)

My motivation behind supporting this law is to teach liberal idealists to stfu about their moral sensitivities with respect to equality and justice. I get so irritated by them, that the thought of seeing them sit in prison with a serial rapist seems like justice being served.

As for the law itself, yeah it's unconstitutional. Be happy we don't have an authoritarian government, because if we did it would be so much fun observing the government teach a lesson to that slothful and co-dependent hip hop generation that plagues our society today.

And Avo, the law can be given stipulations that prevent any negative side effects while satisfying the intended outcome.

Kemp,

You're welcome to offer insight on a better idea of what to do with them. The philosophical idea here is

1. Is the subculture/generation of nutty liberal idealists decadent?
2. What do we do about them?

My view is that 1 yes they are, and 2 see how they like it in prison. Specifically, I am thinking about a huge prison in the Arizona desert. They'll be housed in tents, and if we need more space we'll just add more tents. Moreover, they'll be put in chain gangs. Every man, woman and child will be subjected to meaningless labor for a few years to teach them good values. If they don't change, they can keep working at the desert prison for all I care.

2,167

(27 replies, posted in Politics)

Assuming we can change and make exceptions to the laws ofc.

2,168

(27 replies, posted in Politics)

Do you think it should be a law?

It shall be illegal to engage in activities (such as the dissemination of media or terrorism) that defend causes that would disrupt with the efficiency or demand of goods and services based on moral sensitivities.

This means bye bye Peta. Bye bye animal rights. Bye bye anti-pharmacy campaigns.

I think the punishment should be a minor felony, with like 2 years in prison.

2,169

(111 replies, posted in General)

Nolio,

What do you think about guys who wear makeup?

2,170

(111 replies, posted in General)

What do you guys think of this title for a new porn video?

Deci and a Black girl.

2,171

(111 replies, posted in General)

Gladiator,

Avo has atypical tastes. He confessed to me that he thinks Avril Lavigne has average looks.

Nolio,

Hahaha. I don't know man. I have been pretty drunk before and still was not willing to do the fat meth heads.

2,172

(111 replies, posted in General)

We all know TU is so desperate he would consider at least 90% of the women in the world, while the rest of us have the self-respect to be somewhat selective.

2,173

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

First we have a nut who believes we ought to pursue justice and equality, and thinks there's a class of incorruptible people who can guarantee it efficiently.

Then we have another nut who thinks we ought to guarantee personal freedom, and somehow all rational beings are able to know that a priori. Conversely, anyone who does not know we ought to guarantee personal freedom is incompetent.

Am I missing something here?

2,174

(111 replies, posted in General)

I have noticed that black women with some caucasian features like a pointed nose, thinner lips, and facial structure seem to be the hottest black women.

2,175

(24 replies, posted in Politics)

> avogadro wrote:

men who only care about money and power dont care about women smile>>

Ahahahha! Nice play on words. I assume you can also say they don't care about nice cars or a nice home either.