Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Active topics Unanswered topics
The forums have moved!
Click here to use the new forums. Enjoy!
Search options (Page 77 of 87)
justinian:
*first child statisticly has the biggest chance on survival at birth and after. If there isn't a child, it could be because of infertility unless she's a virgin.
*jalousy is an instinct. Those are blind and not perfect. Males in prehistorical concepts needed to watch after there women for rivals. Its just a wrong concept of mind inspired by this instinct.
Anyway, lets get to toppic.
"Well Obama's said his piece. I found him trying hard to move to the center and to Christianity. He is going to severely upset a lot of Democrats."
The centre I don't know but you are right about christianity. It idd will upset the hardcore atheist but on the other hand he defended themes like abortion wich is very popular in that environement.
But I doubt he won even a small amount of votes of the conservative christians. I think McCain will try hard on that side of the spectre.
The third reich in fact, is a good example whats wrong about the left-right axis and better in the 3 dimensional structure.
Gov: Totalitarian
Econ: centre but with some extreme-left aspects in it.
social model: fascism
Its the econ part that gets people confused. To flints defence, it had some extreme left aspects in it. To your defence alan, the social model was undoubtably extreme right. Now I generalise, hoping you all understand what I said, but I'm willing to explain it further.
a lot of people have done that actually glad.
And the media in the US, like in most contries around the globe,if not all, is politicaly inspired.
@esa:
the problem of example picking I gues.
I think the racist portion of the leftwing side might stay at home so obama looses.wouln't matter anyway
"Spare me your condescending comments, I'm am not some amateur historian that you can look down upon!"
but Wilders is 
"The EU constitution is a little thing? The EU has gradually wormed itself into every aspect of everyday life. I do not consider it a small thing and I would like it if my goverment wouldn't be so eager about letting the country be ruled by a foreign institution."
in that same light, you shouldn't let your village or city run by an outside national dutch gov?
Stop the non-democratic part. Its undemocratic now and the constitution would fix a lot of things. Do you have a short memory or you just want me to repeat the same story over and over again? Besides, you voted for european elections to didn't you?
@bief:
most laws are made by the EU. A constitution is a logical result and absolutely necessary. In this particular case it makes the EU more democratic and gives more rights to its citizens and the chance for countries to drop out.
idd.
"i blame europe though, for teaching young generations that censorship is ok."
? The EU doesn't teach that, and the subject is debated over time and time again all over europe. (especially the rules on discriminiation and racism.)
This energy intrests lies at the very core of all things bief
.
The reason the EU can't act is because of energy blackmail. The reason the US can't act is the same as during the cold war. The russians have thermo-nuclear missiles. I can't blame them. But I do blame the EU for falling asleep and not caring about energy dependance to a despotism.
@bief:
Some people say the experiance from that war in combination with other equipment could improve there skills in this kind of warfare but personally I don't have a clue.
yeah newb,
the EU never gets enough public support for that sort of actions.
@youfool:
we can easely ignore your personal insults directed to whoever but it will cause for many more spamming up this forum when endless replies start comming in. Is there any good reason at all to post them on an anonimous online forum? This is ment just a question, not a an insult.
@subject:
These naive and hypocrit opening ceremonies disgust me anyway but now its even worse.
@bief:
thx for the link. 
@subject
I thought this would be over in a week
oh and another note to justinian;
your disaproval of certain ways of thinking makes you blind for the strategic importance of having a strong europe as an ally. US or EU will never invade each other and are both more or less stable because of the democratic structure. Russia is unpredictable and far more unstable as it appears on the outside.
I see nobody in this thread questioning the seriousness of the situation whilst 2 months back everybody laughed at my prediction for dangerous tensions as an "exageration of predicting a new cold war". That all because of a minor struggle.
Russia still has a shitload of nuclear weapons so has US. Little has changed in the concept of a cold war except for the people themselfs. Russia seeks to defend/expand itself not by "bufferzones" like stalin but by vital energy and rescource control.
@justinian:
I fail to see how views you consider wrong (idealistic as you name them), necessarely have to produce another output as you want it to, and that is what really matters.
But tough I stand by your points wfs, you shouldn't have closed the other thread.
Together with several bombardments by russian airplanes, russian tanks roll into georgia. Officially this is to protect russian troops in Ossetia.
Georgia calls for immediat and total mobilization.
Wonder how the rest of the world will react.
I red all posts and as the subject intrests me a lot so I wonder what east will respond
.
"can't remember which one and believe me I've tried, that has hydrogen powered busses for public transit."
belgium
I'll invest in porn, it never looses its value 
Posts found: 1,901 to 1,925 of 2,163