magical lands. i didnt say we have a democracy. the US is democratic because they vote for their representatives. the US's government is a DEMOCRATIC republic.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by avogadro
magical lands. i didnt say we have a democracy. the US is democratic because they vote for their representatives. the US's government is a DEMOCRATIC republic.
would also make murder legal....
nope. it doesnt make sense. the law would be a violation of the law.
i live like 20 mins from the border, have frequently crossed the border, and i've never seen a hot canadian. canadian chicks are the ugliest!
yeah, zarf, #1 is the exceptions. but you cant love yourself without knowing yourself. and then without being comfortable with yourself, you're not going to expose your true self to strangers and develop true, deep relationships instead of pretending to be cool and hanging out with people that pretend to be cool. Once you develop important relationships, you're going to seek to protect them.
thats how everything goes backwards with the exception of #1. but #1 doesnt even belong on the list. when people loose #1, they're on their deathbed; but people on their deathbed dont all of a sudden hate their loved ones, they usually try to spend time with their loved ones, and still feel the need to protect them.
i think for me, upside down makes more sense. i think the first thing i strove for was self-actualization, once i met that, i sought esteem, then i sought real friends, and then now im seeking safety and security
and though it may be surprising to some, i have never taken a physiology or philosophy class in college. so no, i have never heard of it before ![]()
> xeno syndicated wrote:
> The classification of higher needs is rather dubious. But self-actualization is one, esteem is another, belonging, and security.
so you think self-actualization, esteem, belonging, and security are needed inorder for an individual to be happy?
"http://therawfeed.com/pix/beyonce_phone2.jpg
that's ugly avo?? yikes
lol... tongue"
yep, ugly.
"Avo has atypical tastes. He confessed to me that he thinks Avril Lavigne has average looks."
yeah, man she does..... im not trying to pick a bad picture or anything, but she looks pretty average. http://www.mp3lyrics.org/a/avril-lavigne/avril-lavigne_1.Jpg
maybe if she stopped with that stupid style, i would think more of her. i like strong women so women who dress emo or goth or punk are really a turnoff.
"to be honest...if some man was checking out my dick in the locker room...he would get BEAAAAAAATTTT"
really? you would beat him off? i didnt figure you for a gay man.
> [TI] The_Unknown wrote:
> >I'm actually more selective than most guys ![]()
yeah, instead of the half your age plus 7 rule for minimum age; he uses the half his age, minus 7 rule for maximum age. ![]()
for asians, i think its japanese > korean > thai > the rest > indian. thats on average; there are thai girls that would blow away most japanese girls.
"The basic needs and higher needs are both needs, that is they are both needed, essential for human happiness, fulfillment, meaning. "
could you list off some higher needs? i know you probably said acouple awhile ago, but most of your posts are so drawn out, it would take me forever to find them.
Beyonce is ugly! look at that face!
http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2006/celebdatabase/beyonceknowles/beyonce_knowles1_300_400.jpg
she looks like a dude!
as for Japanese girls. they typically look very feminine and are very fit. which i guess would be a turn off for someone like you, who likes girls that look like guys.
"I didn't say we should return to anything, but more that to continue to focus only on yourself will lead to ruin... My prioity has always been that for humans to succeed we must balance the self with the all..."
thats a pretty basic idea. i dont see what part you would expect me to not get. ofcoarse i disagree with you, but thats very different from not getting it.
> You_Fool wrote:
>Exactly my point, you are unable to see his point because you can't see his world view...
he hasnt made a point
And that has so worked out for us, can you not see that things would be better if people focused on other people rather than themselves?
yes it has. it has seperated us from other animals and led to our dominance over this world. if you dont focus on the individual, but the group, the group fails because its full of failing individuals.
"They aren't, really. Basically, people arrange them in a hierarchy to aid conceptualization."
so then, how is that an improvment?
"Why can't us humans get our priorities straight, Avo?"
people do get their priorities straight. its just that different people have different priorities, because our focus is rightly on the individual and not the race.
you cant say it totally depends on how they're raised. theres other factors as well.
different cultures find different forms as beautiful and find different actions acceptable. women typically are also more conservative valued. they typically hold onto their culture more then men do. very few people have what most white men find attractive, naturally. they have to work their body into that form. black women are less likely to do that because their culture finds other forms more attractive. yes, theres black women that have grown up in white culture and work to get what white culture says is ideal form, but its not common. and thats why attractive black women arent common. to the other extreme, fashion in Japan is way more important then here, and their idea of attractive comes very close to ours, so seeing attractive Japanese women is very common.
"But please, will you also tell me what the goal of the current global economic system is?"
our current global economic system isnt centralized, so there is no singular goal, each individual has their own goals that they attempt to achieve by using the current economic system.
"If you cannot find a stated goal of the current global economic system, don't you think it is therefore quite ironic (if not outright hypocritical) to ask me to explain what the end goal of the economic model I propose might be?"
no, i dont; i dont see how it would be. you want change and i want to know what you envision the end product of your change to be. like i've already stated, im not attacking your stance, i'm trying to understand it, that is all.
"(I doubt, of course, you will answer any of the questions I posed above. Why is that? Oh, wait, I don't suppose you'll answer that question either. I think I'll just stop asking you questions. I guess I'll just state things to you instead.)"
the questions i have answered far exceed the ones you have answered. i dont know why you think i wont answer your questions, the only answer i can come up with is you think i wont answer your questions because you're a moron.
"At this point, all conceivable economic activity surrounding basic human needs is simply taken care of for all people on Earth by automated technology. Therefore, at this point, all remaining human energies are spent fulfilling higher needs: security, esteem, self-actualization, and also at this time, of course, automated technology is in the process of making those higher needs abundant to all rather than scarce at a sustainable and well-paced level."
im alittle confused here. basically you're saying jobs are eliminated so more people can work on "higher needs". what makes them higher?
> Justinian I wrote:
> > avogadro wrote:
men who only care about money and power dont care about women
>>
Ahahahha! Nice play on words. I assume you can also say they don't care about nice cars or a nice home either.
its not meant to be. nice cars and homes are products of money; loving relationships that create stable households where successful people are brought up is not a product of money or powerr.
exactly, its not like im complaining about it. its common sense. the guy your friends with is gonna do you favors. its part of life.
> Justinian I wrote:
> > avo
> hottness has nothing to do with it. the fact is that less then a percent of them are successful.>
Dude. Women love men with money and power.
men who only care about money and power dont care about women ![]()
the only thing fps like is the view. if you have a low weapons skill, you can have the crosshair on the middle of the chest and the bullet will fly across the screen 75% of the time.
hottness has nothing to do with it. the fact is that less then a percent of them are successful.
Imperial Forum → Posts by avogadro
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.