i dont see how any of my language was inappropriate and i dont see how im trolling when he'd begging me to respond to his post. if you have a problem, discuss it with me in irc, dont be inconsiderate of all the people that read these forums by disrupting the forums.

> Justinian I wrote:

> > avogadro wrote:

> Justinian; thats like asking if equality has been tested. no, because if you get close to it, your definition of what it is becomes more strict. its an ideology, it cant be achieved.>>

Yeah, well it's still a good policy to rely on theories that have a good track record on the macro scale, and limit the radically new ones to the micro scale.

And I think you will find that, in political history, equality has been gradual. Little increments here and there lead to more bolder levels. The radical changes in a short period of time also tended to lead to disaster.

it is, and low government interference has much more of a track record then any other.

Justinian; thats like asking if equality has been tested. no, because if you get close to it, your definition of what it is becomes more strict. its an ideology, it cant be achieved.

> ☭ Fokker wrote:

> > avogadro wrote:
> fokker, as i stated before i think the new missles will have better tech and will make a defense against those missles nearly impossible, unlike the older ones that are fairly slow. < *Punctuation corrected by me*

New missiles contain better tech:
  Yup.

Better tech in the missiles will make defending against the missiles almost impossible:
  Non-point; Defending against missiles has always been almost impossible.
Have you ever wondered why the kill rate of Patriot Missiles rarely exceeded 50%? Ever wondered why the so called Star Wars program never actually happened? Ever wondered why our best missile defence system consists of little more than filling the air with thousands of bullets and hoping Nietzsche was wrong about God?
I'll tell you why; Because missiles are [] hard to hit.

missiles are hard to hit. but ever wonder why there are new versions of patriot missles? they're getting higher and higher hit rates. the technology is becoming available to make higher and higher rates of success. while hitting old missles is hard, hitting brand spanking new high speed missles is alot harder. if Russia is going to secure their MAD by making new ICBM's i rather have that then have them try to keep the US from progressing in missles defense technology.

im too content. im not motivated to get a better job or better degree. everyone is like "you're squandering your gifts" and im like "so?" whats a better job going to get me? a bigger house? a fancy brand of car? who needs that shit? i rather do an easy job that sustains me then a difficult one that gets me a big house or fancy car.

its very easy to blame human nature when your ideals fail in real life; but that doesnt make it a valid excuse. it was liberal's pushes in washington that encouraged and forced banks to give out credit to people that wouldnt be able to pay it back, housing being one of the main places where this happened and that caused the crisis.

thats the stupidest thing i've ever read 420. Greed is present in good times and bad, its not the cause of jack shit. the cause of this is the liberals in the US. maybe european liberals are better, but in the US, the liberal attitude is horribly destructive and reckless.

destroyyou, yes, we all know of nuclear fallout, but because a large number of nukes havent gone off, we dont know for sure exactly how bad it is. if you look at other instances where a huge amount of debris was launched into the air, typically a specific continent was only effected. the area that nuclear fallout would hit, could very well be exaggerated inorder to discourage it from ever happening.

as long as the Jews occupy the land they've taken by force, there will be no peace.

> Red_Rooster wrote:

> being sarcastic? if not whats something they could build that would be better? I know they can build better infrastructure for food and fuel and stuff that would be another good investment. Anything better than rockets

why you being such a rocket hater?

"Hamas can also use the millions of $$$ they get to build schools to educate their people rather than build rockets to breed more hatred"

there are more important things in life then a proper education

he said end the word, not world.

as for whether we would end the world; it depends on how you define it. i think we are capable of wiping out humans and a large number of other species, but i dont think we would destroy all life.....  and i dont think acouple nukes would be all it would take. we're talking about nearly every nuke made being used to wipe out the majority of the race, and then anarchy finishing the rest. a handful of nukes could cause cold enough climate to kill billions.