Bass.
BASS!
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASS!
Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-DUNGA-DUNGA-DUNGA-DUNGA-DUNGA-DUNGA-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by ☭ Fokker
Bass.
BASS!
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASS!
Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-DUNGA-DUNGA-DUNGA-DUNGA-DUNGA-DUNGA-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-Dunga-![]()
/fokker wonders why panda has a home
Aren't we missing a poster?
The deep thud shook the tower with enough force to shatter the remaining glass. One of the Wardancers on guard peering through the scope of the Kallum rifle said "Get Krg, it is time"
"Are you sure?" Frgr asked him as the two other able bodied warriors began securing Krg to the table with lengths of cable torn out of the walls. Another thud shook the earth and a plume of smoke and dust rose in the distance, "I'm sure".
As the Teranova gave the signal and rose from the planet the Crbrs rose out of subspace, brutally punching its way into the universe trailing fire. The moment it was fully inside the universe squadrons of triple winged fighters launched, firing upon the orbital defences as the Crbrs dove towards the planet, roaring into the atmosphere as the Terranova broke the clouds with dozens of anti air missiles in pursuit. And instant later more missiles emerged from the clouds as the first group found their target.
No explosion?
"Mass packets, ram them!" Subcommander Erf called over the roar of reentry. If too many mass packets hit the Terranova she'd be to heavy to manuver, or worse too heavy to escape. The Crbrs pitched violently as the collective impact of the mass packets struck like a gigantic hammer, "Armor?!" He called above the alarms, "Holding!"
"Take us back up, signal the clawships to move in, but remind them to only commandeer the defences, nothing else until the Terranova is gone."
Buddhism - 110
Taoism - 0
Now go outside and play X(
Better pictures:
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/12_02/women101207_468x392.jpg
http://www.dw-world.de/image/0,,1536193_1,00.jpg
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0btj8Gi0rl2zz/610x.jpg
http://img61.echo.cx/img61/8241/libyan5cu.jpg
http://img63.echo.cx/img63/8558/bg3lc.jpg
I think some are for show and some are for business.
Headbanging, fist clenching, ugly fat guys, sweating, wearing studded leather, in a cellar... It's only gay if you make eye contact ![]()
Usurper, Metal Lust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh6Opjf9Tns
Old news, he's had them for years, and they're highly effective.
And the video doesn't work X(
They're called prostitues.
You're going to insert your testicles into my anus? I think you need to have a talk with your Sex-Ed tutor, you seem a little confued as to how the big boys like to play.
> [RPA] Arocalex wrote:
> I thought Earth was destroyed frankly<
Way to miss the point! ![]()
>and not all planets can be super dense planets<
So what you are saying is that the entire UEF is made up of planets with low poulation.... the same UEF that apparently has ships numbering in the billions (It must if everyone has fleets numbeing in the millions) all of which seem to have serving crews of a million or more?
I know this is roleplay but could we try a little realism please? Or at least THINK about the numbers we've just pulled out of our asses? ![]()
I've yet to see a man do that...
And I'll make you a eunuch.
> Translucent Night wrote:
> why didnt i get any shouts ![]()
is it because i'm an openly christian christian ![]()
I think that's unfair to say
If i had said it the other way, Even I woulda said that was sorta harsh
<
Not really, I hate openly sexual anyone, gay, straight or dog.
There are more people on Earth than in the UEF? That's a little strange for an intergalactic empire to be less populace than a single planet don't you think?
Sooo.... I don't mean to screw up this discussion by getting back on topic, but:
Has file sharing ended yet?
> [Pw9] Lyvidian wrote:
> ITT, people pretend to care about shit that doesnt effect them.<
I care because it will affect me.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7380400.stm
<<The sight of two girls having a post-pub fight still has the power to shock, although it often happens between men. Why are women doing it and why are we so offended by it?[/B]
"I've beaten a boy up with a stiletto high heel and left him unconscious," says one 17-year-old.
"I got locked up last year for putting a woman in a coma and she nearly died because I tried to throw her in front of a car," says another. "Then in October I got out from a sentence for nearly running a woman over."
That these words are uttered by teenage girls is somehow more shocking than if they were said by young men.
According to the annual statistics of the Youth Justice Board, the number of violent offences committed by girls aged 10 to 17 has nearly doubled in three years.
In 2002/3, there were 8,702 girls convicted of violence against another person, a figure that rose to 15,525 in 2005/6. During that period the number committed by boys rose 50% to 39,136.
There have been some high-profile examples. In 2005, there was widespread disgust during the trial of four youths who kicked to death a barman on London's South Bank.
The court was told that Chelsea O'Mahoney, 15 at the time, had filmed the attack on her phone and delivered the last kick "like a football" to Mr Morley's head.
The following year Claire Marsh, 18, became one of the youngest women to be convicted of rape, after pinning down another woman and encouraging a gang to participate in the assault in west London.
In a scrap
These reports still jolt society in a post-feminist age, partly because they are so rare and partly because women are not expected to be aggressive.
For a group of teenage girls in south London aged 16 to 18, interviewed by Radio 1Xtra, violence is a part of everyday life.
"Girl on girl fighting, scrapping, it's become the norm now," says one.
It's usually based on territory, they say, and happens between their all-female group and other groups of girls from different estates, often preceded by verbal sparring, rumour and gossip.
They usually just use fists, but have known bottles, knives and even pieces of wood to be brandished. Binge drinking and drugs are the main reasons they give for getting physical.
One teenager with 20 violent offences to her name says: "It's only when I've had a drink and I think I'm on top of the world and I think I can take on everybody. I know I shouldn't but I can't help myself when I've had a drink."
A police report last week suggests that the number of women arrested for being drunk and disorderly has increased by more than 50% in parts of the UK in the past five years.
Offenders at New Hall female prison in West Yorkshire say they used to get into fights to impress older boys. And one talks about the adrenaline release of fighting: "Even when I get hit myself I get a rush from it."
'No shame'
But Victim Support says the main underlying reason for this aggression is people growing up in violent homes or suffering abuse at the hands of a partner.
A study by criminologist Susan Batchelor, of the University of Glasgow contradicts previous thinking that unlike in men, for women it's a spontaneous lack of control for which they afterwards felt ashamed.
Her report suggests female displays of aggression have a function within a group.
"Such violence was considered deeply meaningful; it served to maintain group solidarity, reinforce friendships, affirm allegiances, and enhance personal status within the group."
The peer group always plays a large part in it, says consultant clinical psychologist Elie Godsi, author of Violence and Society: Making Sense of Madness and Badness.
"There's a lot more of a 'ladette' culture where young women are aping and mimicking the traditional behaviour young men engage in.
"So there's a small element of that, although I wouldn't put too much [importance] on it."
Many young people feel alienated from their family and community, he says, so the peer group plays a big part in gang culture, causing behaviour that the individual on her own would not contemplate.
But it's important to remember that overall, women only commit 10% of violent crimes, he says.
They are innately less aggressive, whether by nature or nurture, which is why society reacts so strongly to it.
"Women are defined in terms of relationships - as mothers, daughters, wives - and men are defined as individuals, in terms of achievements or work status or what they do, rather than how they relate to each other.
"So violent women are perceived in far worst terms and it takes more for them to be violent.
"But you only have to look at how Myra Hindley was treated as an icon. A lot more men are far more violent than her and given far lighter sentences. Generally we perceive women who don't fit into traditional roles in extreme terms."
Mr Godsi believes the increase in female violence merely reflects the general rise in violence since the mid-80s.
And the reasons for it - more destructive households and more alcohol abuse - are not peculiar to women.
So we shouldn't necessarily be looking for reasons behind female aggression, he says, but asking why society as a whole seems to be tacitly encouraging violence.>>
The title is a massive misnomer in my opinion, and the answer to it is obvious (again in my opinion): Welcome to the age of equality.
As for the true content of the article, I don't think this is a new problem, I think it has simply become easier, more acceptable, for people to express themselves in this way.
I also think that this nanny-state is partly to blame, ten years ago (when I was a lad!) you could still expect a good smack from PC Plod for such behaviours... actually you were lucky if you were still conscious by the time you got to the cells, but potato/tomato yeah?
The problem for me here is that I know [I]something[/I] is wrong but I can't really say what, or why, possibly because I had the same kind of upbringing as some of, if not most of, the girls this article seems to focus on, with similar results.
Whatever happened to the good old days when girls with issues became sluts?
> [Pw9] Lyvidian wrote:
> awesome i lll be dead before anything bad happens, and the later generation can suffer, all according to plan.<
Joke or not I can't decide what your statement makes me feel more; pity or disgust.
I've never seen a station located in the way you describe BW, perhaps your conspiracy is limited to the US? After all, climate change will affect everyone differently.
Weird? It sounds, and looks, like standard mass-market metal to me, I don't see or hear anything weird. Hell even their musical gimmick is standard issue with metal now... Now THIS is weird:
8 Bit Mayhem - http://www.myspace.com/8bitmayhem
Possibly because it was a sendup of "Jesus on E"
So you think the Earth will cool based on... Plants? Plankton? Three months of temperature data from this year? The apparent seasonal shift of winter into spring?
Not that I care, whatever happens my country will get very cold very fast. Maybe I'll go skiing in Scotland when I retire?
Climate change is God messing with us, he's still pissed about what happened to junior.
What?
If it has been proved it's not caused by the sun or cosmic rays, and it can't be caused by us because that's just arrogant, then that just leaves God, and in case you have not noticed he has been mighty quiet since we flogged and raped his kid to death.
[Edit]
Ten years based on what? This years shifted seasons?
Imperial Forum → Posts by ☭ Fokker
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.