1,576

(21 replies, posted in Feedback)

I cannot find it mate, do you have a link?

1,577

(10 replies, posted in General)

yeah 'cause he lost me after cheesecake lol

1,578

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

I'm all for giving it a go, just because I oppose it doesn't mean it won't work, if it makes it more fun then "hell yes" I'm all for it, but I know some of the players in this game rage over losing one single planet and vow for the next thousand years that they'll be hunting you. It doesn't take much to be "labelled" dishonorable and soon there's a lynching of an innocent person\family.

1,579

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

I like pie wrote:

Removing the IA rules and supplanting the shifted balance with tweaks to the game mechanics would imo solve this abuse, not cause more.


Now you're talking about "tweaking" game mechanics... I'd like to know how, that may change my mind on things. OK then, why initially was IA introduced? would be interesting to know why and are the same things which made it "illegal" then still exist the way it's played today?

1,580

(4 replies, posted in Ideas)

Yeah it's pretty much common knowledge where most people hail from, just the new guys are a mystery for awhile.

1,581

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

If anything is open to abuse in this game then this would top the list imo.

1,582

(4 replies, posted in Ideas)

I like pie wrote:

it should ideally be limited to people within your family or alliance though, otherwise people would too easily become targets

thoughts?



Hi there smile me again tongue It wouldn't take too many rounds to know who logs on and when...

1,583

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

In a cancel War I just don't think you should have all your shares Sabotaged by Fams on the other side of the Galaxy that have nothing to do with it, leaving your attackers sending fleets from your home system, I mean who would want to War at all?

1,584

(286 replies, posted in Universal News)

I second that Vote.

1,585

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

Oh... maybe a Galaxy with shorter build times for the n00bs? I guess it wouldn't work as I believe you can't have different types of Galaxy options..?

1,586

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

You a correct in saying the established rules turn away new players, but surely this is at the bottom of the list as to why. I mean, half a day for something to build (provided you're allowed to)? Having to do what you're told "because thats the way to win"?

Halve the build times. People these days just turn the x-box\psp\wii\PS3 on. Has anyone actually thought through the Psychie of the current players? Obsessive compulsive springs to mind....

1,587

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

I just don't believe a fair fight should resort to "asking" for help. Losing planets then sending retakes to planets which are now in the hands of the Fam you beat earlier and are now NAP'd to because that was the only thing the beaten Fam could do to get their round back on track. Next thing you know you're down 100 planets because you got shafted by the Fam your fighting because they handed those planets to another Fam for "safe-keeping".

1,588

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

So you've been honorable all round, you're going to win the round because you played fairly etc, the rest of the Galaxy doesn't think you deserve to win (percieved farming, dodgy moves, or just don't like Render winning) so they all drop their NAPs and send you to the bottom. You forget the crap that has already gone on before when it is an Illegal Alliance, is it even worth playing with certain people knowing that their head hunted by other players? Why bother playing for a month when you can lose it all in one day?

1,589

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

I like pie wrote:

Can you give some examples?  I'd be interested to see if there's a way to solve such problems without putting such heavy restrictions on gameplay.




I just don't think it's right that one fam with 100 planets has to fight 3 or 4 fams with the combined planet count of 300 because someone in the 100 planet fam is a douche. Surely you've read the "we'll farm you to the ground or to delete if you don't get so and so out of your family" posts etc etc. You'd have to have a whine thread for the venting... Can Bara ever play again without being picked on every round? by everyone? And that's just the start of scenarios...

1,590

(36 replies, posted in Feedback)

I voted that they are fine the way they are, I do not think it would be good for the game. It opens too many cans of worms imo.

1,591

(6 replies, posted in Questions)

Meh it's still the same.. I can live with it though, thanks Miz wink

1,592

(6 replies, posted in Questions)

yeah I did see that but man I have to wear sunglasses just to look at it lol tongue

1,593

(15 replies, posted in Ideas)

Yes!!! Non-Market too!!! wink

1,594

(30 replies, posted in Ideas)

Oh and I think the turning off lasers thing should ONLY be between Fam members and not Allies. I wouldn't want to be NAP'ed to someone who's laser trapping a planet just for their Ally (whom I'm not NAP'ed to) to take it and rape me.. smile

1,595

(30 replies, posted in Ideas)

Gwynedd wrote:

Adds a whole new level of strategy.


yes, yes, yes.

1,596

(30 replies, posted in Ideas)

I like pie wrote:
~* Darth Vader wrote:

Umm you can do that now, and if someone wants to Jump 900mil figs for an EOR jump who cares? Planets win the round, not NWs.

You can exploit construction bonuses now yes, but he is right this will make it even easier.  We'd have to at least consider what it means to facilitate that style of play.



Yes I agree, but you can do that now, the problem with it is travel times (having one planet in your HS) etc, it sounds like it could be exploited yes, but then why haven't the top fams been doing that? because it's not as easy as it sounds.. imo.

1,597

(30 replies, posted in Ideas)

Umm you can do that now, and if someone wants to Jump 900mil figs for an EOR jump who cares? Planets win the round, not NWs.

1,598

(30 replies, posted in Ideas)

If they're not on the "Enact Trade List" then it's just a normal attack.


I like it, I'd like to be able to "turn off lasers" too, so scenarios like the one above isn't as easy as IMLC makes it sound, you'd obviously send some sort of Fleet to "take-over" the planet as well.

1,599

(10 replies, posted in General)

Cheesecake kicks ass all day. wink

1,600

(286 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol lol