A sword? A specific type of sword perhaps? I don't know

A hat?

Go Skyrim!

The lake was a salt lake (and in reference to The Yell's answer there is such a thing as a dry suit for diving, mainly used in super cold climates)

Edit --> Or a dry lake (which most salt lakes are)

This should be fun to watch

I think they got rid of it due to abuse. Someone created on that was the size of your regular race screen, everyone thought their race was one thing when it was another or some such nonsense.

Part a) yes he can trigger
Part b) the planets are in effect blown up.

Used to do this when I was a tutor, some people would explo 6 planets and then just idle, so early on i would send a kill fleet to each hp, and just leave it there for if i needed it.

Did Alundra just ask to see a threeway?

> Poley wrote:

> CF needs to shorten. Shouldnt take any longer than 12-24 ticks for leaders/VLs to decide an outcome.

>Too many fams will use the last few ticks to raid and set up position so they can safely portal/LT under the CF. Would more than likely end up causing more farming imo. At worst it would cause attackers to protect cores and limiting spreads so they are quick enough on retakes etc before time ends - limiting targets because of poor spread.

...............................................

If one of the families is more inactive than the other, then you have a situation where 12/24 may not be enough, but on that point it is open to discussion. I think somewhere between 24/48, as it would give families time to sort stuff out including agreement within a family as to whether to pay or keep warring. And yes, people could portal under the ceasefire - giving the smaller family that was cleared away from the bigger family the chance to explore in their cores and set up to raid their bankers. Yes it works both ways, but if the family is too small then they can always choose to not negotiate and 48 hours would give them back their protection under the 35% rule.

....................................................

> Testudinidae wrote:

> This idea is solely benefitting the family that is winning the war as they can then portal all the new shares and rape even more the next time.  This is a bad idea.

..................................................

I think I cover this, with allowing the losing family the chance to gain better position (possibly). Further, if for example before the war there was a core NAP, during the ceasefire the losing family could use the time to infiltrate these core systems and set up to raid bankers etc.

................................................

It's not a fully formed idea by any means, but feel free to contribute to it if you see ways it could be improved.

Moved ---> Community

And hi, long time no see.

I'd love t read this thread but I cant look past Humidity's avvy.....