1,476

(78 replies, posted in Universal News)

"we can make the justification just as easy to say they should be traded out. "

Mmk lets trade em out. fine with me

about honoring naps, if that's the way you honor naps then I too advice no one to sign a nap with you guys.

1,477

(78 replies, posted in Universal News)

now please Hydro, take the time to respond to me in a proper way and make "educated statements instead of accusing " me of anything. Your last post was generally just contradicting itself, now try to make a good one or shut up, plz.

1,478

(78 replies, posted in Universal News)

you call me a moron hydro? fine. sad how people call others morons when they can't win arguements.

why don't we accept a pnap? easy. We are entitled to those planets. They are not yours, they should never have been yours in the first place. Now don't go saying those planets were so hard to gain, because they were empty planets taken from 91 after they'd been taken from us in the first place. I heard you took other planets as well. Good for you, oh wow you must've been our heroes saving us from the wrath of 91. NOT. your strike on 91 hardly helped as by then we were already down and out, after 91's surprise void.

Now, why should i calm down, Orbit? I'd like to adress the fact I wasn't the first to make agressive posts. I quote:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Today 15:38:41
Kollop
French Hen

Re: You NEVER firm NAP with these players....
Funny you post a thread in community saying we don't respect naps before asking me the planets...

We saved your ass attacking the family that was farming you for days. Strange way to thank ppl.

As usual u managed to ruin ur fam round taking all resources to jump fleet and go on unstoppable fights for ur fun even if that kills the 12 other members.

Ur fam doesnt exist anymore and u want planets in a core u dont even own anymore. Ull have ur planets but we will raze ur fam I know that you don't care but at least your fam members will know that you that it is because of you.

Funny how you always want to have your name next to good players in UNI
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Today 16:09:53
Kollop
French Hen

Re: You NEVER firm NAP with these players....
Never said we attacked 91 to help u, but when we attacked 91 they were farming you to the bone and that helped you.

I respect naps, same as Orbit and all the players u took the right to name to accuse them. Ull have "your" planets in systems you are not atm lol and we will raze you immediatly after.

If your fam members want to change leader, or if suddenly you start to care about them ill sign a pnap with no core
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Today 16:33:10
Kollop
French Hen

Re: You NEVER firm NAP with these players....
Pnap with no core or being razed, is it decent?
Offline
__________________________________________________________________________________________

Today 18:20:25
Kollop
French Hen

Re: You NEVER firm NAP with these players....
Send me list of planets with player names, ill have them clear.
We will give u the plts, even if u had lost them forever to 91, then since we dont like this nap we will cancel it and raze u.
That will occupy our attackers that were bored.
Offline
__________________________________________________________________________________________________--

Today 18:29:11
HydroP
Player

Re: You NEVER firm NAP with these players....
Perfect!

oh, and i got dibs on Monkey D Luffy! So keep your grimey fingers off him pit, luster, orbit!
Last edited by HydroP (Today 18:30:05)
> hummy wrote:


And I now shut up, and prove my self in game.
___________________________________________________________________________________________

I see some talking about pnaps, but even more about farming us. Now, you say I should calm down? Get your own fam members in line first Orbit, before you start complaining about my posts.

I think you misunderstand what I'm whining about. I'm whining because you guys are using this as a sad excuse to farm us. Either be a man and give us the planets back that never should have belonged to you, or give up this argument and tell everyone how you are not cancelling on us because you want your planets but because you noticed how easy of a target we are and decided on farming us for a few planets.

1,479

(78 replies, posted in Universal News)

Yeah cuz that's what you do when a nap is violated. You stay quiet about it till the other fam gets such a big advantage over you that they cancel on you without giving the violations and rape you in the ass.

Except this time you guys were already at a HUGE advantage, with us having just gotten out of a war that hasn't gone too well for us (for those who can't notice sarcasm, it was terrible) and you guys having the opportunity to grow.

Oh and don't act like you wouldn't have cancelled on us otherwise. you just warred 89 and 03 so you wouldn't war those again. you probably have some agreement with 04, 91 and 92 as well, and are allied to 90. So why not just beat down the next biggest fam, right? Especially if that fam just got out of a war, only makes it better and easier for you guys? doesn't it?

fricking hell stop using this as an excuse already. You ain't fooling anyone.

Oh and us raping your attacker spread in mid-round should be seen as quite a succesful skirmish...

1,480

(78 replies, posted in Universal News)

If i wanted to trash your name Hydro, I'd have put your fail in pw in my sig.

Just find it really gay how you guys still try to give this as an excuse to kill another fam. Not like those few planets would've made you guys cancel, you just need planets and are too sad to cancel on anyone big.

Man we were raping you guys back then, why'd we nap you.

1,481

(78 replies, posted in Universal News)

GAYYYY

*whine whine*

1,482

(78 replies, posted in Universal News)

Meh. Just an excuse to farm a smaller fam who just got out of a long war.

Name it like it is instead of saying it is because we wanted planets you should never have owned.

1,483

(78 replies, posted in Universal News)

Maybe because we just got out of a war? That good enough for you?

Who the [Risingdown is a bad boy] is gonna mention core breaches to a napped fam during a war so the fam you're warring can just get free planets...

1,484

(78 replies, posted in Universal News)

wow, that's sad... you can't uphold to a nap you signed yourself, so you cancel?
Let's make things clear:

-We nap. Our fam (01) was bigger back then, but this shouldn't be an issue, since the nap still stands.
-Nap contains a clause about cores.
-We war 91 and lose control of some of those systems.
-Nap has not been changed, the core agreement is still the same.
-You take some planets from 91 in those systems.
-Still, no change in the nap, agreement still is the same.

How is it not clear that we have made an agreement in the past, which has not been changed up and till the present, and therefore that you should hold yourself by the agreement?
So, because you guys don't want to give up a couple planets that never should have been yours, you want to cancel on a smaller fam you had napped in the past because they were bigger and you were scared, and farm them to hell?

How the [weeeeeeeeeeeee] is there any honor in all of this? How the [potatoes!] is this justified? How the [UD is sad that there were so many fbombs here cuz it would be mean to post conway twitty lyrics on all of them] can anyone ever take a nap they have with any of you seriously (excluding perhaps orbit who is not making any threats).
This is some sad shit guys... really sad.

1,485

(685 replies, posted in Universal News)

spot open in nr 1 fam, plz join us wink

1,486

(20 replies, posted in Politics)

oh ok, fair enough. didn't read that/forgot it already

1,487

(20 replies, posted in Politics)

yeah it's clear that those who went on crusades weren't the brightest of all, but that is general knowledge, isn't it?
What are you trying to state here anyways? or was this just meant to be educative? yikes

1,488

(685 replies, posted in Universal News)

k awesome Forever big_smile. welcome back

1,489

(9 replies, posted in Questions)

yeah welcome back frenzy big_smile random into my pw fam ^^

1,490

(685 replies, posted in Universal News)

hi forever, you back again? big_smile

1,491

(685 replies, posted in Universal News)

Best agent opper with pax as race, hell yeah!

1,492

(9 replies, posted in Questions)

Frenzy you back? yikes

1,493

(685 replies, posted in Universal News)

what's up with all the hate metrex

1,494

(230 replies, posted in Universal News)

see i was right big_smile

1,495

(230 replies, posted in Universal News)

lies.

1,496

(230 replies, posted in Universal News)

Bullet stop trying to draft anyone into your fam no one wants to join you and serenity! >:(

1,497

(685 replies, posted in Universal News)

huh wut Bullet, you think i was still looking? na man i couldn't find you drunk so i gave up days ago.

1,498

(685 replies, posted in Universal News)

nice pvc star, thanks big_smile

1,499

(20 replies, posted in Politics)

"Since the rulers of the crusader states failed at diplomacy and military strategy, they were pwned by inferior Muslim forces many decades later."

I wouldn't call the muslims at that time inferior at all... they were technologically advanced to a level the european countries, blinded by dogmatic christianity, could ever think of achieving.

1,500

(34 replies, posted in Strategy)

So Noir, what you are saying, is that because pop bankers grow so slow they should aid out their income whilst pop grows at bor, to then receive the income of others as pop has become fully grown to then build, in order to grow slowly again, slowing down the fam's growth in the process as compared to the fast growth of cf bankers who can aid out as well and receive aid as well (so this shouldn't be any difference, except that the cf banker will aid out more due to faster growth of income due to building times and pop growth time)  but are able to grow faster in early stages due to low building time of CF's as compared to LQ's+pop growth?