Im pretty sure my fam members will be OK with it .

Not sure if 74 will be though ... It will have to be clarified properly whatever way it goes though

I actually really enjoyed it. It dont see how it strays much from old Indiana Jones. Except for the son. That was absolutely unnecessary. But hell... Indiana Jones are insane, over the top, pumped with special effects (Raiders had the best special effects available for the early 80's). This one fit the bill.

X is an attacker... So theres that... Although with 300 planets, Im not sure how good he will be come war

Funny thing is, we wouldnt have minded NAPping a while ago. Hell, I think I brought it up like 5+ days ago? We just wanted to hold off a bit (2 more days) for our own reasons.

If you guys had just been like: good war, you won, we lost, can we have a NAP already so we can salvage our round....
This would have been over. But hurray for PW suicides. More planets for me

w00t Blade... Up for another round sometime?

huh... Love how people questions Pinks skill as an attacker. I thought the 100s of planets lost to him would have shown otherwise . And thats apart from leading the strat etc.

Thats like telling someone theyre a bad banker even though they make more, aid more and recieve lesser than you do

- someone who likes to stay sober and tells me that its fun watching people drunk/high. That maybe true [sober person] but its not fun to have a totally sober person next to you thinking he is always right (the I'm not drunk, you are argument) standing next to you killing your buzz.
Note: Some people can stay stone sober and not be buzzkills. I have no problem with them.

- couples who are wayyyy in love and dont mind showing it. Get a room. Its sickening to watch you constantly hold hands, pecking each other on the cheecks/lips (I don't really mind all out french kissing as long as the girl is hot), call each other by cute and cuddly names. Especially if you know one/both of them really well.

- on that note, people who become totally different when they start going out with someone (and I don't mean first date, this is like a proper relationship where you havent become nicer/meaner/whatever to get into her pants). Especially cause these never work out and you are left consoling one/both of them after its done.

- consoling people after they break up x(.

- People in the same group going out. Cause once they break up, they still have the same friends and they fight each other for who gets which friend.

yeah... I've had some annoying friends with relationship issues...

TNT NAP version 2.3 between <family> and <family>
.

Attacks of any sort, including agent and wizard operations, of one family on the other are forbidden, except by prior arrangement (as for a planet trade).

Planets lost to any forbidden attack will have to be returned with an extra planet as compensation. Failed attack will have to be compensated by one planet per attack except for the first from a player.

Damaging agent and wizards ops will be compensated each with the cession of a planet to the damaged empire. It is the attacked/opped/spelled families responsibility to message the leader as well as the aggressor to ask for compensation within 48 hours, once 48 hours have passed and no message has been sent to the offensive family, compensation will not be required.

If compensation is not paid forth after 48 hours after the notification to leader and topp vice of the offensive action, the NAP is considered NULL AND VOID. In which case, after 48 hours is up and no compensation has been paid forth, a message to the Leader and 2 VLs to state that the nap has been voided will be required before any attacks will be allowed, unless the leaders of either family reach an aggreement before 48 hours is up to agree to any additional time limit to allow compensation to be paid forth.
If the notification of the offensive action is not sent the first 48 hours after the attack no compensation has to be payed and the NAP can not be voided.

This NAP has no cores.

This NAP may be revoked with 48 full weeks (RL hours) notice, with counting beginning at the start of the first tick after notice of revocation is given to the other family (in other words, if notice of revocation is given a few minutes into Week 1 of any year, then the count starts on the first moment of Week 2 and ends with the last moment of Week 49, and Week 50 is the first tick that the NAP is no longer in force). The NAP has to be canceled by msg the leader and the topp 2 vice in each involved family.

If allies are attacked by the opposing tri with an uneven number like 2-1, 3-1 or 3-2 odds ( this does not apply when 1 family attacks 2 or 2 attack 3) then the NAP can be canceled with immediate result during the next 24 hours after the war has started. This can only be done if more than 10 attacks by the allies helping out happened the last 24 hours. Normal cancelation time does not apply in this case. If one of the fams doing a 2-1 or 3-1 offer compensation they cant be voided upon. All planets taken have to be returned and 1 planet for each second failed attack has to be payed in addition.

(I prefer changing a couple of clauses but this a very good NAP agreement)

wtf... since when has it been illegal to ask a fam to clean their own cores (maybe point them in the right direction if necessary ). j/k.

But honestly, IAs are almost never a big problem in the game... Why are they cracking down?

If you are done fighting a fam, and dont want to get into it with them again, PNAP is the best option. Safer for both fams cause there is no core stuff involved etc.

PNAPs are also helpful when two fams are way to close together... Best if you wanna avoid early conflict/conflicts with dozens and dozens of shares ;o

is there a lot more resourses starting off in MW, or is something messy with the networths?

Cause it seems that building tos and demolishing farms at start just seems to have gone out of style

@smartz and Wild- SPARTA! Yesss... And Munchers. Thats the round . It was fun