Rofl

...in the German admin I suppose?

lol

lol

true avo, unfortunately.

But maybe people will start changing their minds *if* he falls. The difference with this guy and for instance bush is that this guy controls the media, wich is insanely undemocratic.(with democratic, I mean the control system) Whether you are for or against you have to admit that if bush would have been trialed in the same way and for the same reasons, no way he would have been reelected.

lol@that movie
and lol @bief

Bief, a lot of people in the Netherlands and Belgium are obese.

What is my score on the big political contest anyway? For those who already forgot: there was a big contest with players arguing about a subject which was picked for them as well as the fact if they were for or against it. It was one vs one and the winners would compete again until their was one

It depends on the definition of "starting the war" but such a EU report isn't that trustworthy. At best it represents the honest subjective opinion of a few. But often those reports serve another cause.

@tavius:
We need to separate financial and other companies if we want to debate this properly.

Let us debate about companies like GM first. If they get sold out, and no one bids a large amount of money to buy it, it get sold at a low price. Mostly because they cannot rent the money. But that is only a good thing if you think about it. They get a company at low price, without previous debts. They need to lower production and costs till people want to buy more cars again. If they fail in their management -but it can't be worse as the previous staff- they get replaced again. Its a cost but worth the gain.

"The current solution being implemented globally isn't ideal but the alternative of inaction is much worse."
Inaction isn't the only alternative. Also I'm not advocating no help at all. I'm just saying its going way to far, and it keeps the wrong people at the top to guarantee the same future mistakes.