"
Re: New trend of IC

Undeath you are basing that premise off of last round...they didn't do it the round before that and we havent done it this round. So that actually means your statement is untrue since the % is in favor of him NOT pnapping every fam that would challenge him."

False, I'm basing that premise off of years of watching Noir's strategy of nap everyone and whore the infra

I'm glad someone else brought up how silly it is that Noir is the one talking about how IC is focusing more on not fighting and infrawhoring   He was a bit of a pioneer in that area.

> Pitbull wrote:

> I'd rather fight than nap. Our problem (95) was i was the only attacker available to war ( I was going to cancel my fishing plans to war). Me alone against Teddy, HydoP & crew would have been a slaughter. I did ask my fam/leader to try and secure a 48hr nap for a eor war.

Paying  450 planets was a bit to much for my liking, I would have like the opportunity to get them back.

97's problem is similar.  Except that instead of only have one attacker available at a particular time, we've only had one attacker all round:p

88 canceled on us the tick after we used savings to jump a banker, we have 1 attacker.... I'm confused as to what would have been fun, or smart, about fighting that battle

I have to do stuff again

No one ever plays with my genitals

teehee

I worked landscaping for 6 years, and helped my friend's dad with his nursery for a long time.

Put in the amount of twirlymabob seeds i've thrown at people, and i've planted loads of trees.

Meh.  Do away with healthcare entirely.  Every time a cure, vaccine, etc. is found, Darwin's ghost kicks a baby

I can't play

Apparently my comp can handle Skyrim, but not d3

Who is playing?

> Amspir wrote:

> How is promotion of the game handled?

I used to write

www.imperialconflict.com

in every public bathroom I pooped in.  I think thats been the extent of promotion over the past 5 years.

to quote Tenacious D

Neigh, we are but men