WFS

weren't you always a fmod?  It seems like forever..

Jesus I just remembered I'm now a contestant in the next Elimination: Fmods! thread...

>>See, how simple it is ??  When editing in Politics, you need to keep it simple and direct to the point.  No "Funny" stuff.<<

Oh, it's gonna get Funny all right.  Until everybody learns to flame cultures and homelands and not each other!

"My object all sublime
I shall achieve in time
To let the punishment fit the crime
The punishment fit the crime
And make each miscreant
Unwillingly represent
A source of innocent merriment
Of innocent merriment"

>>Spiderman!
Re: Things that piss you off

the police

avogadro
Re: Things that piss you off
> Spiderman! wrote:
> the police

oh god, i cant believe i forgot about them.

[TI] The_Unknown
Re: Things that piss you offoh yes!

the police... check

The Empire Of Kane
Re: Things that piss you off

the noise mobile phones make through your speakers when getting a message or a call.

of course the police, <<

This one's for you!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=1VRZq3J0uz4

"The Jungle" is the one about the meatpacker, right?

Sinclair was pissed off that nobody gave a damn about the poor immigrant workingman and his struggles that he wrote the novel about, everybody howled about food quality.

"Worst of any, however, were the fertilizer men, and those who served in the cooking rooms. These people could not be shown to the visitor,

See post #38 in this extant thread for a wiki link

http://www.imperialconflict.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=13618

"6. No flaming or trolling
Do not verbally attack or provoke others into fights or post for the sole purpose of causing unrest or dissent and stirring up trouble. Do not use immature name-calling and do not take personal conflicts onto the forums in public.

Moderator action: Posts deemed to fall under this category will be edited by mods. Offending threads will be closed. Multiple instances will be deleted. "

I guess you think I'm censoring you, YouFool.
But it ain't so.
What I'm doing is talking, you hear?
I'm talking to all those villains down there in Kansas.
I'm talking to all those villains in Missouri.
And all those villains down there in Cheyenne.
And what I'm saying is there ain't no flame wars in IC Forums.
And if there was, how they wouldn't want to come looking for it anyhow!

there's already a thread on this in community...

well...

a man's gotta shoot his own dog

don't be silly, i've got a twin bed

No need to kill him, just have him impeached for continuing the illegal Iraq war Hillary voted for.

I'm very sad to say it seems more likely than not that he'd accept her, it shuts up so many critics who want to pretend she was cheated.  And if they link up they'll trounce McCain.  His best shot was "I'm not Barack or Hillary' but he's blown that by agreeing with them on so many issues.

The hymen is...

damn is virginity so rare to you guys that I have to go into it?

"learn history. Dred Scott was the slave and was the plaintiff. and he tried to "sue" his slavemaster, not a state or all the southern states. the southern states did not have any power over the ruling. it was purely supreme court."

You're right about the parties.  However, the legal principle was that a free state had no authority over property in another state; and that when property in one state was moved to a different state, it must remain property everywhere in the United States.   That is hardly an affirmation of states rights over federal encroachment.  The situation Lincoln stepped into was already a boiling cauldron of resentment at the Federal authority denying any Northern or western community the right to oppose slavery.

YES SIR!!!

oh wait a minute...

BW

Gee thanks Sarge. 
Actually I think it would be easier to do than you'd think, something along the lines of OhJeezAGrenadeI'mTooCloseMightAsWellLieOnIt

"it was a tyrant forcing federalism over states rights. outlawing slavery in the rebelling states was just a way for Lincoln to cripple their economy to punish the south. He was no saint."

Actually the slave states sued to the Supreme Court to ensure that every state, whether it wanted to or not, accepted slaves as chattel property of their masters.  That was the Dred Scott ruling that invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1850