1,301

(193 replies, posted in Politics)

you're right, while we're at it, we should make all polic unarmed too. and soliders too. lets see how far we get like that.

1,302

(61 replies, posted in Politics)

you have a psychological illness for paying the extra money for "nike" brand shoes.

1,303

(193 replies, posted in Politics)

how is being killed by a gun worse then getting killed by a knife or a number of other objects? isnt the object to reduce murders in general? isnt strictly looking at gun deaths inaccurate?

"(edit: If God was all-powerful (apparently so) and liked people worshoping him (he certainly seems to!) you would think that he would have lightning avoid hitting churches. Or if he wanted a church to be destroyed for some reason, then a puny lightning rod wouldn't make a difference. Perhaps he's just not that all-powerful after all)."

the way i look at it, assuming God is all powerful and all Knowing, the universe is exactly how he wants it to be; there arent some people that piss him off and other people that make him glad he created the world.


and there was never a point i avoided, there might of been some minor points not  worth bothering, i think mainly they were where you would make these big assumptions over and over again, didnt feel like pointing them out every time. if there were some specific ones you though that you want me to address, no problem.

1,305

(61 replies, posted in Politics)

the problem with cuba is the fault of cubans and can only be fixed by cubans. Cuba has alot of room to grow economically very cheaply, which would attract alot of investment if companies werent afraid of loosing their investments to Cuba's government. Make it friendly for businesses and the US will have no choice but to lift the embargo, and there will be money pouring into the country.

well, if you were open about your true intentions, instead of trying to be deceitful, maybe you would of gotten more from this thread tongue

"You believe that there is no evidence of anything, not me."

ok, how do you prove your senses dont deceive you?

"but the best thing would be healing the occasional deserving amputee so that they can carry on teaching, healing, assiting and working for God."

says you.

"which is that our senses are probably completely screwed up and don't at all interpret anything correctly."

i am not proposing that they are probably screwed up. im proposing that its possible that they're screwed up, and theres no way to prove they arent.

"Having a discussion about anything at all is pointless when you want to base it on the fact that perhaps your eyes make up everything you see."

i disagree. the fact that we cant prove anything, doesnt make life pointless.

"
Why do churches have lightning rods? I saw one on the way to work today and it made me wounder."

why wouldnt they? you think that religious people think they're immune to forces of nature?

"I admit that I can't help bring it up again, because it is just crazy to me what you found your beliefs on - nothing. "

well, you now know that theres no evidence of anything in the world. why do you believe everything you believe when its based on nothing?

"So if I have this correct, you worshop a God who apparently Loves you and tells you what set of values and morals to live by, but he can't live by them himself?"

wrong he could live by our morals. i worship a God who's values are different from our own, and inspires us to challenge ourselves to certain moral standards that are best for humanity.

"It's only a personal choice that seperates you from them"

its only a personal choice that seperates anyone from them

"Don't you think that if 20-25% of people in the USA are fundamentalists, then that could potentially be dangerous when they are in command of the largest military in the world?"

i think they're more danagerous to the rest of the population of the US then they are to foreign people.

"Who/what created God?"

God always existed.

"that you are in some kind of matrix and that what you interpret probably isn't reality"

no, im saying we have no evidence that anything we sense actually exists. we have proof of nothing; you base all your beliefs on blind faith in your senses and the senses of other people. heres an example you help you understand alittle more, you see two posts in the distance, one appears to be taller then the other, you look at a different angle and the opposite looks taller; this isnt some matrix designed to misinform you, its a common fault of our sense of vision where closer objects appear larger; im not saying that we cant believe anything because theres a possibility of a matrix, im saying our senses can be faulty; could always be faulty, and theres no way to prove they arent.

1,309

(15 replies, posted in Politics)

"If it was Goverment controlled then how do we know that the Goverment is telling us the truth?"

how do we know the media is telling us the truth when it isnt government controlled?

"Where do the values associated with religion come from?"

God

"If we pretend that these are not values"

we arent pretending they arent values, we're recognizing a different set of values.

"Perhaps I can learn something. What are those groups in the US that advocate the teaching of creationism in schools"

theres the blanket term, christian fundamentalist, which online i've heard roughly 20-25% of the American population is (much less common in the reast of the world). and are basically anyone who believes in literal interpretation of the bible.

"Saying that the church never taught creationism as what they truely believed"

well, provide some type of source and i'll beleive you, i havent heard anything that has indicated that the catholic church ever taught creationism.

"but if we follow a particular religion now we are told what to believe."

you are not told to believe whatever you like then, to answer your last question.

"how do you know that he knows you exist?"

we dont, although most definitions of God does say he's all powerful and all-knowing, meaning he would know everything, including your existence.

"How do you know that there is a heaven?"

we dont

"How do you know he listens to your prayers"

we dont

"and even gives a stuff"

we dont.

now how do you know the earth orbits the sun? how do you know gravity exists? how do you know your name is what it is? how do you know the sky is blue? you dont, you beleive it because your parents and the rest of society tells you to, and it makes you feel good on the inside. the beleif in a God or religion is no less valid then the beleif in any scientific principles. i thought we already went over this, why do you need to bring it up again? there is no evidence of anything, so dont ask us why we know something, because we dont know anything, no one does.

"ou were the one that, a few posts ago, were talking about values associated with christianity and God"

values associated with a religion does not equal the values of God.


"Some do at least, do you have any figures that show its MOST?"

Christianity's population is 2.5 billion. Catholicism is 1.2 billion. eastern orthodox is .081 billions; combined they account for over half the christian population, they do not believe in a literal interpretation of the bible, so do not support creationism. the other religions dont have such strong churches so there are differences in beliefs with them, so its hard to separate them on this issue to find out how many worship what, but considering none of the large categories' sections that define their faith inclused creationism, it is likely that even a majority of them dont believe in it.

"Pls inform me when the church (vatican?) stopped teaching that God created everything in its current state, and started teaching evolution"

they never taught that God created everything in its current state. and i would imagine they started teaching evolution when it became widely accepted in science. during medieval times, getting an education meant being taught by a church, so yes, churches that taught mathematics and science, and other things and werent always correct, but educating people in what was modern science/mathematics/literature and dogma are two different things. even today, there are alot of catholic schools giving affordable educations to people, these catholic school teach things such as evolution and the big bang theory; but neither of those are part of dogma, and if either of them are disproven, it doesnt disprove the church, the church was just educating people on current science.

"Is it just another example where you can choose to believe whatever you like"

you can always believe whatever you like, its called free will.

"isnt this just you making up your own weird blend of religion and science, neither of which are based upon anything?"

no, most religions dont disagree with the theory of evolution.

1,312

(61 replies, posted in Politics)

"First off open up a history book cometime and learn about WHY the Cuban people revolted to begin with. The previous government was pretty bad. Sure they were funded by the Soviets at the time but if there wasn't so much poverty in the country before then there woulnd't have been so many willing participates. History is a 3 sided sword, our side, their side, and the truth. Try to understand all 3 sides of history before comming here and tyring to use the actions of a government 40 years ago as justification to keep up an embargo that existed before many people were even born. It hasn't worked, and most people have accepted that. Those assets are gone, drop it, you wont' be getting them back. You can't contunie living in the past and expect to be taken seriously."

that doesnt contradict what i said. and if they have accepted that it has failed, then why havent they changed their government? you want the US to fund a government that doesnt work? just throw away money?

1,313

(61 replies, posted in Politics)

"Cuba is no threat to the US and we should drop the embargo on them. Flood the country with US tourists, investments, and goods and watch the country open up"

at one point we didnt have an embargo and we did flood them with investments, goods, ect; and the Cuban government seized US property and cost us billions of dollars, and thats why we put the embargo up int eh first place.... Cuba needs to compensate us for our investments in some way if they want the embargo lifted.

> Schniepel wrote:

> arent you assuming the values of a God are the same as the values of Humans, isnt that a giant assumption?

well at least the bible is saying that god created humans as his copy.. so you could assume that we honour the same values as our god.


i think its usually translated to his "image" if we were "copies" we would be all powerful gods too that could create universes.

"
If you want to base any discussion you have in any part of your life that upon the foundation that everything may be BS because your brain is only interpretting signals - then what is the point in discussing anything? It's a complete waste of time."

the point of discussing it is to show that believing in things that arent proven is something everyone does; and religious person takes no more of a leap then someone who isnt religious and is smart enough to realize that everything he senses doesnt necessarily exist.

""Why does God hate amputees?"'

God doesnt hate amputees; you ask why doesnt he do stuff, but why would he? arent you assuming the values of a God are the same as the values of Humans, isnt that a giant assumption?

"If evolution is a pile of #$%#, then why do some snakes have usless pelvises, some animals living in the dark have skin grow over their eyes over long periods of time, and how do viruses mutate?"

evolution isnt a pile of shit; its most likely what happened.  MOST religious people beleive evolution exists.

"How about study of biology and human body"

thats flawed, its like knowing someone is telling the truth because they tell you they're telling the truth. all our studies of biology and the human body arent reliable because they're based on the signals sent to our minds that we have no way of authenticating.

"Look back at the questions I asked Phoenix about evolution"

ummm, why dont you repost them directed at me if you want.

1,317

(15 replies, posted in General)

im the smartest person in this forum, which isnt saying much.

i googled, and didnt see anything thats proves that our observations of the sun, earth are accurate.

"Suggesting that the signals sent to our brain are not correct - as if God was some kind of sicko that likes to play with them (is that what you are suggesting?) - is beserk."

well, if its so beserk there must be proof disproving it, where is it? you so blindly believe that the signals sent to our brains are correct - as if some God made them correct.

"Did you google it? "

google what?


we're not going to get anywhere, when all you try to do is distort what i said. i said none of the 6 things you are summarizing.

now, you dont agree that we cant prove the earth orbits around the sun, correct? how can we prove the the earth orbits around the sun when the only thing we can use to prove it are signals sent to our brain whose authenticity cant be proven? if we cant prove the authenticity of the signals sent to our brains, how can you prove anything based on them? or do you think theres a way to authenticate the signals sent to our brains?

"neither your 'this' nor 'that' are correct."

if you dont believe its definite and you dont believe its subjective, what do you believe? whats the other option?

"Now we are getting confusing. It was you who talked about the realities and stuff"

basically said, we know nothing for sure about the world, unless you define the world by how our minds interpret the stimulus from our senses. you then replied "By the world in which we live I mean the world which we sense" i took that to mean, the world is what we interpret it to be.

"So the side with most numbers is always right?"

no, thats not what im saying at all. im trying to take baby steps for you, but it seems like you're still unable to follow.



either you think the world is definite, and we have no way to know that how our minds interpret the stimulus reflects anything in the world and we no more know the earth revolves around the sun then we know there is a God. or you define the world as a construct of our minds. if you consider the world a construct of our minds, and you believe there are religious people that exist, you are living in a world where God exists.

what part of that dont you understand?

"This to me sounds like you are admiting that God only exists in our minds, and is not a 'thing' or 'being' that is actually here there or anywhere except in imaginations."

wrong. what happened was, you said everything only exists in our minds, you said reality is defined by what we sense. so then i said, if everything only exists in our minds, then there is no question whether or not God exists.


"if the world is defined by how our brains interpret the stimulus we receive from our senses, then every person's world is different and God must not exist in a lot of them"

if you define reality by how we interpret the stimulus our brains receive. and you believe there are roughly 6.5billion people. yet you believe God doesnt exist, you are ignoring the 6.5billion minds who have interpreted the stimulus they received as a reality where God does exist. so either you are a moron, dont believe religious people exist, arent atheist, or dont believe the way our minds interpret senses define reality in which case, nothing is proven, not even that the earth orbits the sun.

"By the world in which we live I mean the world which we sense"

there we go. ok, so if the world is defined by how our brains interpret the stimulus we receive from our senses, then every person's world is different and God must exist in a majority of them.

"You believe in the message and in the ideals, and so you choose to believe in the existence of God? You think that these ideals and morals would be non-existant if God was not there?"

no, i think that the morals and the ideals are worth adhering to, so i adhere to them, which includes believing in a God.

"It has been proven."

what part of there is no evidence anything you sense is real dont you understand?

"Which, like I said in the previous post, is the world in which we live."

no evidence of that.... just what you sense.

"
You still haven't given a decent answer why you believe in him, and this other magical supernatural place that we can't sense. It is because your family, friends, priest and the place in you bought up told you he exists and it feels good and so you have no need to step outside this comfort zone."

i have given a decent answer, you just choose to ignore it. i believe in the message, and ideals of Christianity, so i follow it.

"Like what?"

like the earth orbits the sun.

"If something is not proven; science is quite good at saying "we dont know if this works, but this is what we think"

science isnt concerned with what really exists, science is concerned with testing their empiraclly.

"This is just 'blah'. Values have nothing to do with which religion you are"

it has everything to do with it. maybe you should stop telling religious people what they beleive, and listen to them?